ab29

From my perspective, there is nothing to celebrate 🤔

I like Heartblock's ideas. Agree with Rockets: LTN segregates children and people in general into the better ones, deserving cleaner air and those who don't. I don't see anyone from the pro LTN commando commenting on that; what a surprise - they don't want better air quality for everyone, only closed roads for themselves..

Remove LTN in Dulwich - serving a handful of people and harming local community.

So basically this is pure nepotism - trying to get money for your friends and family.

Where is this info available re: Dulwich labour cllrs and property developers pls? slarti b Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > VotethemoutMay22 Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > A group of us have got together (from all > parties)because we believe that our local Dulwich > councillors have not represented everyone in the > community when pushing for the Dulwich LTNs. > > A bit of an understatement there. I think what > you mean is our local councillors have > represented a tiny minority of activists and > misled and ignored the vast majority of their > constituents! > > Fascinating reading of some of the candidate > profiles, I had no idea how closely several of > the Labour councillors are associated with > property developers, very clear conflicts of > interest there, I am surprised the Labour party > tolerates it.

Have you donated? No? So its none of your business what people are doing with their money.

I donated to One Dulwich and have no problem with that. Need to keep trying as long as there is hope to remove the harmful, unjust and utterly ineffective scheme which is LTN. The rest of the money can be donated or, even better, used to remove the planters and bollards currently blocking the roads.

I only received a leaflet from infamous Cllrs Rose and Simmonds in Dulwich Wood which went straight into the bin. Hope May election will see them out.

Whoever does it is in fact a criminal and should be punished. Not to mention that if the tyers have to be replaced and the old ones thrown away it simply producing unnecessary rubbish. Let's see what the pro LTN commando has to say when planters and bollards currently blocking some roads are removed or damaged by someone.

Complete lunatics. Hope they are caught and fined.

Hope it's spend on removing b***y planters and bollards

LTN = discrimination https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/exclusive-dulwich-alliance-back-away-from-legal-challenge-to-low-traffic-neighbourhood/?fbclid=IwAR0lGPcKoHk3SWael0Q5G8BeAB7Wl84g1W0Pi8cv-IyH59XCXbDEdWxCFRU

Well, I'm always a pessimist when it comes to Vlad the Psychopath. The Guardian and UK for UNHCR have listed charities helping Ukraine: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/feb/28/how-can-britons-help-the-people-of-ukraine https://www.unrefugees.org.uk/take-action/how-to-help-ukraine/

To hell with LTN and all those who invented it! Throw your neighbours under the bus - what fun!

Traffic has increased on the roads such as LL, EDG, Croxted Rd and on many other roads such as Overhill Rd or Crystal Palace Rd. Anyone living on these roads or using them knows this. Of corse, if all you do is cycle from Dulwich park to the closed junction in DV via Court Lane then you have no idea what is going on in a real world.

I fully agree with Rockets and Heartblock. LTN brought nothing but misery to people on the main and boundary roads, caused miles of idling traffic which worsten the air pollution and divided the community. It is a spectacular failure.

"Not sure what parallel universe you reside in, but boundary roads are choking under the weight of increased traffic. You don't even need the data to prove this; you can see the difference with your own eyes." Yes. Yes yes yes yes yes. Sadly, you can say it until you are blue in the face - the unfeeling pro LTN crowd - including Labour councilors - do not give a damn.

Aren't you a super pro-everything-eco, sitting happily on the recently closed road? goldilocks Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Oh good - we've moved through cyclist bashing onto > the 'war on motorists'. > > Its like an abridged version of the comments page > on the Daily Mail. > > Do we even try to stick to the topic any more, or > is this the 'get out your populist pet peeve' > section?

Petition against LTN in Lewisham https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/13000-people-sign-petition-against-low-traffic-neighbourhoods/?fbclid=IwAR08rlh57kqK7pJw0b73EVm7Niouo83hCVqjepczYER6_5uFsrFuavzbZb4

I'll vote Tory too. Have never done it before and could not do so nationally but locally, anything to shake the Tower of Sauron (aka Tooley Street).

Anyone who promises to remove the LTN - harmful and unjust scheme - has my and my neighbours vote.

As long as they promise to remove the LTN I do not care. northernmonkey Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Just don?t kid yourself you?re not voting Tory!

"the idea of presenting Tory candidate or trying to position them as ?centrist? just because they?ll campaign to remove LTNs is a dangerous and slippery slope." For me and my neighbours removing LTN means LESS air pollution and LESS noise. What's not to like?

"What policies do they have that show they?re ?centrist? @heartblock? " - good question, as majority of what Labour does these days seem to be rather extreme e.g. LTN: screw those less off & living on the main roads - we have a new idee fixe now!

Well, this is true.