JohnL

We say residential areas - but the bottom of Rye Lane is now higher density residential than many "residential" areas - however we all acknowledge the pubs/clubs were there first - so noise is tolerated - but more residential incomers every year. But has anybody actually done any noise planning when 7 story buildings are being built next to pubs that have been noisy for years (anyway off topic as I assume the CPT was there about the same time as the residents or built after). In my opinion the pub wasn't that noisy on Saturday Evening - they do have a DJ but it's not really excessive. Most problems I've seen are people going home a bit worse for wear.

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > JohnL Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > I popped in Saturday. > > > > Didn't think it was too loud - but was busy. > > Heineken less than ?5 - which is more than I > can > > say for some of the other bars I frequent. > > > EDT Heineken ?4.20 Amstel ?4.10 Carlin ?3.80 > > DulwichFox EDT not one of them - not naming the ?5+ bars :) Sometimes I drink Camden Hells -I think that's often a little more than Heineken.

I'm not sure Damian Green realises how badly what he's saying will go down. He's making out they gave money to NI out of generosity - we all know it was a deal.

I remember Pick Your Own - brilliant idea to get the consumer to do the work but they must have realised.

Barnett formula I think it is. They've bypassed that apparently somehow - but Wales First minister has already put in a huge moan.

I popped in Saturday. Didn't think it was too loud - but was busy. Heineken less than ?5 - which is more than I can say for some of the other bars I frequent.

1 Billion for NI for the DUP votes - 100K per vote. This magic money tree is good :)

We need some elected power to match the HOC

sabrina79 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > no 999 for this but 101 this is not a case of > death/emergency .....hope you called the police > when it happened ?!?! It's a crime in progress - so technically can be 999.

DulwichLondoner Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > rahrahrah Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > There is a small point where > > pedestrians have right of way. Cars should slow > > down and if someone's approaching the crossing > > stop. It's not difficult > > Do they have right of way even when the traffic > light is red for them? > Even when they jump in the middle of the road from > behind a truck which hides them from the view of > oncoming traffic? > Even when they jump in the middle of the road > forcing motorists to make panic stops which are, > in and of themselves, dangerous? > Yes they do - once in the road, as the other option is just to run over them. If a pedestrian appears in the road for any reason whatsoever all other traffic should stop (even if the pedestrain is completely in the wrong - and could be prosecuted later - he has right of way for now) watch out by Peckham Rye by the way as the whistler is jumping into the middle of the road all day every day at present.

We've been told our flats are all secure (as in a fire cannot spread between flats) But I read if you make holes in your walls (to hang a TV for instance) this can break the fire wall (don't know if it's true).

My flat door isn't secure as it is at the moment We really need threats of home invasion -----anyway see u all after the election - to stressed for this ----------

brilliant Maybe we should all sort this down the pub I feel unsafe

Borky Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > 3 on the list so far but I expect it to grow. You > fools better pack a small bag and out your affairs > in order , that 5AM knock on the door is imminent. Even the rude stuff on here isn't that terrible ?

Don't put any HUUUUGGGGEEEE cartoon from the Daily Mail up here unless you would be willing to plaster it across the local pubs :) And that is HHHHUUUUGGGGEEEEE. (you could have made it a bit smaller) (really I don't care - because it's the Daily Mail)

Everywhere outside London doesn't include Wales where I'd expect my home seat (Gower) to go back to Labour, and maybe one other. http://www.itv.com/news/wales/2017-06-07/labour-are-on-course-to-retain-their-dominance-in-wales-according-to-our-latest-poll/ This of course could be part of the game - but I have a feeling they've peeked at the postal votes (edit: illegal of course - so not casting aspertions :) ). https://www.rt.com/uk/391147-labour-tories-general-election-2017/ (It's Russia Today ;) )

Wales Online goes for it's Lions test team http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/rugby/rugby-news/how-likely-lions-test-xv-13148586 What only 8 Welshmen - Where's Rhys Webb :) :) . Not that I'm counting nationalities - but it won't be that.

jaywalker Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > It is going to be raining all day tomorrow. That will suit my mood.

Maybe it's ironic :)

With all the issues recently and the attempts the Labour party have made to woo young voters (Corbyn's on the front page of Kerrang and NME, he has the support of Grime4Corbyn and his rallies are always packed out). if they don't come out this time I despair.

Louisa Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > If there's any positives for Labour, it's that the > bookies are offering much shorter odds on them > retaining more seats than was the case a month > ago, and if you believe all this stuff you'll also > notice Labour are highly likely to increase their > share of the vote following the last election. > > Individual constituency bets are where things > start to go wrong for Labour, marginals like > Halifax and Exeter are looking considerably > favourable for the Tories, which would go along > with the wider picture, a swing from left to right > enough to give May her majority. > > Louisa. Yet that YouGov poll was meant to look at individual constituencies - although they did have a huge margin of error. Might be egg on the face for them (again)

I loved Fallout 4. Will there be Zombies after this nuclear apocalypse ?.

Borky Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > a free market does not trump basic maths I don't bet so I wouldn't know :) but I suppose the customer gambles the bookie doesn't.

Gatland for years was of the school of thought that you kicked the ball 50m in play then turn it over when the opposition run back at you. So you don't see a lot of balls kicked into touch. But thought that might change with the Lions.

Borky Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > A bookmaker does not have an opinion after a > market has initially been made, they are neither > right or wrong. Anything suggesting the contrary > in the bright sparkly light of knowledge is utter > stupidity and show a basic lack of understanding > of how things work. It's a free market surely the bookie wants people to bet - but also must make money. So sets the odds in order to do both. Do betfair have odds - that's a slightly different system ?