JohnL

It took me a while to see it when I saw Pestons post :)

TheCat Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > In a previous job, I got summoned to the big > boss's office got a bollocking for using the word > 'bollocks' in a message to a colleague when > referring to my thoughts on something that someone > at another organisation had said publically (the > colleague didn't complain, it was IT/Big brother > who raised it) > So when a shiny new IT system to check words in emails comes in the system should be built according to company requirements in consultation with management, NOT the company modifying it's beliefs and systems to fit in with the IT system they brought off the shelf. But thats what tends to happen and then the company finds itself restricted by the system developer in what it can say :). We'll all be sending identical emails before you know it.

I don't consider FFS as swearing. Its all part of the internet https://slate.com/human-interest/2015/04/omfg-ffs-wtf-a-deep-dive-into-sweary-abbreviations.html#:~:text=Abbreviations%20make%20it%20easier%20to,the%20GD%20(goddamn)%20NYT.&text=Its%20popularity%20has%20led%20to,Over.).

We really can't believe what we see in the press much anynore, Look in the mirror and where's the phone cord. https://www.standard.co.uk/news/us-politics/boris-johnson-joe-biden-first-phone-call-trade-b900916.html BBC have removed it even though .... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-55783781 Can you see the cable LOL

diable rouge Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > JohnL Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > LOL - Oh yes > > Help is at hand... > She's describing the EDT with maybe Arsenal playing and defending a 1-0 lead.

Anyway SKS is a lawyer and he's more likely to prove the Tories guilty than endear himself to the public. Boris just doesn't answer though, can he continue that for 3 years.

Sephiroth Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Any country is facing a chance of being > outnumbered and all manner of caveats apply > > But infections are going down or plateauing - > death numbers lag. Vaccines are happening > > If any government can mess it up then I'm pretty > sure this one can. But I think if they don't do > anything stupid and manage us out of this lockdown > sensibly then we will be relatively ok That's where I'd place my bets :) There will also be a couple of mess ups no doubt.

TheCat Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > KidKruger Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > ...and perhaps that?s why BoJo avoids Kier?s > > questions. We?re heading for 400-500,000 deaths > by > > Xmas IMO, and Kier?s suggestions to date (if > acted > > upon) would have significantly reduced that. > > Slightly off topic...but you believe that we will > average well over 1000 deaths a day for the whole > year? That seems pretty out there...not saying > it's wrong, but definitely a "ballsy forecast > KK.... If the mortality rate is really increasing it's possible and the increase in mortality ** could ** be more than is reined in by the vaccine - then we really are in a mess. Edit: of course this is a really bad scenario - really bad. There must also be the Captain Trips (stephen king) scenario though however small (one in a million, one in a billion but its there ?)

He's a lawyer and he acts like a lawyer. I think the red wall seats will move to Labour if they don't see change by 2024 (and I don't know what will change really).

I've never been there. Not very good at buying and selling. but I'm Free For Shipping

Facebook has now set-up it's own Supreme Court that decides who gets what punishment for what. Of course the first Facebook user in the dock is Donald J Trump.

Form Filling and Sealing :)

Oh yes and a Charles Tyrwhitt flyer (I get one every post) that expired 17th January :)

I got an reminder for an a 5 yearly appointment today (posted december) and a credit card (requested december but no point in reporting it missing in post I just watched my balance carefully)

Anyway lets all be pleased the banging has stopped. (not related to Boris being on TV at all)

That's awful. Sounds really similar to the below in Milton Keynes. I'd think the effect on you after this would be closer to home invasion than theft. Really some sort of trauma help should be offered. https://www.mkfm.com/news/local-news/man-threatens-woman-with-knife-type-weapon-during-catalytic-converter-theft-in-milton-keynes/

That's true, afraid I'm a serial editor of posts due to consistent errors. :)

Hybrid grass (mixed real and fake) and is a thing now on football pitches.

OP - Maybe cut this criticism by editing the original bit of text. (just edited a bit about Biden).

And BAM - All undocumented Immigrants should have a pathway to citizenship Imagine Priti Patel doing that - although she's just call them illegal aliens. "And top Latino and immigrant advocacy groups who?ve seen details of the coming package said they were stunned by the boldness of Biden?s plan." ?We were totally floored by the immigration plan and the level of clarity,? https://www.politico.com/news/2021/01/15/biden-immigration-plans-459766

WHAM - Well Nigello he's certainly upset the TERFs on day one - might or might not be radical depending on your stance but he's sticking to his principles. https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/2021/01/10272481/biden-executive-order-transgender-women-girls-protection On to day two.

That bust of Churchill is stored away in a secure basement in area 51 by now LOL. He's not having that watching him every day.

DuncanW Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Did they also have a graph to show compliance of > the Sky News team itself :) Beth will have served her penalty soon, Kay has a few months left to go. Wonder if like a footballer they'll have to work their way back to the top - I've seen a lot more of the deputy political editor recently. Their penalty and how easily they find it to return is an example to us I suppose.

So both a measure of thickness :)

DuncanW Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > But I just don't think it is down to other > customers to try to enforce this regulation for > all sorts of reasons, not least you may well be > accosting someone who has a genuine reason for not > wearing one. Someone with an ASD or anxiety type > condition probably already finds the situation > they're in quite stressful. > Actually Sky News showed a graph a few days go that showed the whole nation on the whole is compliant with a few exceptions. The journalist presenting it suggested the biggest bang for your buck would be to tighten measures for everybody not chase the non compliant people. Of course the non compliant would stand out even more in this case.