Spartacus

Welcome to Texas "Leatherface"

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > fishbiscuits Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > I've never queued up for 45 mins at Moxons. > > Sometimes 10-15 mins, I suppose. > > > > They prep (descale, gut, fillet if you like) > the > > fish on the spot, just like Sopers and other > > fishmongers do. THAT'S WHY THERE'S A WAIT. I > admit > > they're quite expensive, but what you're saying > > about them is just not true and makes me doubt > > that you've even been in there. Maybe glanced > in > > and seen the freezers on the right. > > > > Daft thread. Don't know why I took the bait > (ha). > > Shouldn't get reeled in (ha ha). > > There were 20 people (I counted them) in the Moxon > queue yesterday (Sat) > so at 2 minutes per person that would be 40 mins. Your maths is not your strong point foxy 1 server 20 people yes 40 minutes However as there are often multiple servers on a busy day then that time goes down exponentially and rapidly. Maybe try an experience and cross the threshold you may well be pleasantly surprised at how quick you do, quality of stock and knowledge of the staff And if you are really lucky they may even have your all time favourite "crabby" sticks

Blah Blah Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > lol Spartacus! I've already had 'the look' from > the wife. Who dis I've changed my phone and don't know who you are (especially if you are getting "THAT look") You're on your own now as no man or army can defend you especially as your wife will soon raise the time you did x y z back in 2010 and she still hasn't forgiven you - Mrs Blah ,right with you on that (Spartacus knows which side his bread is buttered in this fight)

DovertheRoad Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Nice analysis Blah. You two are on your own now , I've called the Samaritan's for you as you both seem keen to end it all but I can't be responsible for the carnage that you are begging for ! I've also told my mummy and she says I can hide behind her skirt so I don't have to watch the ritual disembowelment by the collective war machine commonly know as the East Dulwich Women's Institute 😭

Blah Blah Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Isn't this a bit like the question 'why is it > nearly always the man that drives?' one. I suspect > the evolution of BBQ thing comes from men being > butchers and preparing all things meat. And we > probably have the Victorians to thank for it, as > with many things. Nowadays though, I think women > are just smart enough to know that if you can get > a man to do the donkey work, let them do it ;) And blah just launched a scud missile into the mix .... dude don't do it ... Spartacus runs for cover and considers hiding behind a rock till the dust settles and the women come out victorious from the fight at we all know they will !

DovertheRoad Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > KidKruger Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > ....because blokes are shit at salads ? > > > I would say more men make salads than women > barbecue. It's all in the dressing isn't it? Whatttttt , there's a special way if getting dressed before making a salad Well you live and learn and could explain why my salads are so bland, lack of imagination in dressing up....

Oh THAT friend who was at the place we can't mention in public with the thing we can't mention 😱 say no more

KidKruger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > ETA: So a friend tells me. 😏 And this "friend" is also the same one who lobbed the salad hand grenade on the other BBQ thread

KidKruger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > ....because blokes are shit at salads ? And kid just lobbed in a hand grenade of controversy

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > SpringTime Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Sopers > > Sopers sounds better but a long walk as I no > longer Drive. > > Sopers is a Real Wet Fish shop established 1897. > Fully trained staff who know about Fish. > > Moxons comes nowhere near. It's a shop that sells > fish. > > Foxy Then go to the supermarket as going to local shops sounds too arduous for you but don't come hobbling to me when they are gone As for moxons their staff are also trained fishmongers but a slightly bigger organisation than sopers Your question has been answered with two local options so now you have a choice of three places to go and you can take your pick of whichever suits your preferences (cost vs distance vs size) Sadly no one can solve your problems for you

That Answers your own question foxy Either pay for quality, possibly hand dived large scallops or get peas from the supermarket Your choice but my advice is use the local businesses before they are lost and supermarket rubbish is your only option 😱

I'm asking for a friend who's still too scared to go to the supermarket to get chicken. Are you allowed to kill and eat our non native greys ? I know St Johns had them on the menu once but the annoying ones in my garden don't look like they will have much meat on them ! Is it legal ? Is it safe ? Any sauce or cooking techniques you can recommend ? Can you make a coat out of their pelts after ?

Moxons

Dangerous waters you are sailing DoverTheRoad Hope you have Mae West on for when you get tipped out of your boat 😱 Threads on Brexit, political outcry, cycle lanes and Road Closures seem tame compared to what could happen in here ! >

Mr chicken Stop your silly clucking and twisting of my words as you are scratching uselessly in the ground. The point I was making is not that we should all abandon public transport wholesale and move to cars, simply that as public transport presents a higher risk of germ and virus transmission then we should abandon the drive to push more people onto it as pre pandemic it was already at peak capacity. There is an equal balance of the needs for cars, public transport and other methods of getting around and the push for cycling can't be touted as a one size fits all solution.

mr.chicken Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Rockets Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > > > Mr Chicken, [...] what are you afraid of? > > Getting run over on a bike, getting pollution > related heart disease or a lung condition. There's > plenty to choose from. Guess the advice that has been dolled out to the car wed could be applied to you here, if the area doesn't suit then you could always move to the countryside. Or is that too much of a price to pay, much like its too much of a price for car owners who it's been leveled at ?

Don't get me started on jet packs exdulwicher

Isn't it a shame that the science fiction utopia of flying cars that was predicted in the 50s didn't come true. Then again this thread would be "our healthy skies phase 3" and imagine the outcry over cars getting free parking on the roofs of houses. George Jetson, where are you when we need you?

Johnl that defeats the point of removing the mayor and all the infrastructure around him to save money for essential services Sadly devolution adds layers of bureaucracy and cost between the people and the funding suppliers (I'm this case the government) Let's look at Scotland as you brought it in, they maintain a separate parliament , parliament building, support staff and all the associated costs which could be better used to support the Scottish people if the funding was applied through a UK central body (one small group of officials managing projects across the 4 regions of the UK) Whilst devolution is a good ambition, sadly like any organisation, money is siphoned off to maintain it which is lost money to the people who actually need it. There needs to be a balance between local representation and cost effectiveness which is what the system of MPs for the country is supposed to deliver however add in buildings, parliaments, assemblies and the money is directed away from where it is needed into the supporting systems costs fairly quickly.

I guess removing the Mayor and all the whole infrastructure around him would save a chunk of that money that could be diverted towards the police and fire brigade. Then central government can run London and it will be on their heads if additional cuts are needed 🙄

BBC News - London's pop-up cycle lanes 'stopping disabled travel' https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-53670087 An unexpected unplanned side effect 😱

It's bigger than just our government, it's a global lessons to learn, which the UK will of course need to be included in but let's also look at the cause of this global pandemic, why governments didn't get coherent advice from those who should have (WHO ?) and yes this government like all governments around the world made mistakes and hindsight is a wonderful tool for bashing people who made decisions based on the best advice available at the time it was taken. We are all armchair critics of our government but if you were on the firing line at the time you may well have made similar good and bad life impacting decisions. For example we could all with hindsight pass judgment on the mayor for reducing the number of tubes and buses to save costs when passenger numbers started falling in the early months of the pandemic which potentially increased transmission rates as tubes once again were packed. However hindsight tells us that it is a virus transmitted by proximity and highly contagious so again the mayor acted (with hindsight) incorrectly but at the time there wasn't enough information from the advising bodies (WHO) so he could be conceived as doing the right thing at the time he made that decision to save money. It's tricky to look back and apply today's knowledge when judging decisions made with less information or advice on hand at the time. Short answer is that yes, the UK government needs to be included in a global pandemic review but ultimately it has to be done in context and in light of the fact they were reacting to a new unknown and highly contagious virus that they had very little information or knowledge about with very poor advice given by influential organisations.

eddeal1 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > yes more than one time Sounds like you want / need to talk about it

Is this based on something that's happened to you recently ?

Regardless of your views watch "surviving the virus : my brother & me" that was on bbc1 tonight That will quash any thoughts about conspiracy and the end statement where doctors are afraid of the next wave will show why releasing lock down is such a tricky beast to manage.