ianr

>Next years UK entrant has to be John Shuttleworth But Shuttleworth is a radio man. I suppose changing it to the EuroAudition Song Contest would be out of the question? What would be the economic consequences?

jollybaby, was it possibly an instance of this HMRC error? http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/10174577.stm

> PS not sure if calling it the Tube is correct, but > i'm just enjoying it! Tube tube tube:)) It can get confusing.

The Charles Booth online archive might be worth a look: http://booth.lse.ac.uk/

The planning application 08/AP/0579 granted here http://planningonline.southwarksites.com/planningonline2/AcolNetCGI.exe?ACTION=UNWRAP&RIPNAME=Root.PgeResultDetail&TheSystemkey=9527944 is stated to be conditional upon development being started within three years of the date of decision, 10/06/2008.

beesical threads http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?28,318990,319346 http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?28,458864,459492 And the lbka thread in the latter points to this, which looks useful http://www.kentbee.com/kbka/info/faq/faq-bees.shtml

>I know it's not strickly 'legal' but she's trying to do them a favour. Postal Services Act 2000, section 84(3) - "A person commits an offence if, intending to act to a person?s detriment and without reasonable excuse, he opens a postal packet which he knows or reasonably suspects has been incorrectly delivered to him." Whereas the people here who've opened mail sent to an unknown person at their address seem to have had no intention to act to the addressee's detriment, and to have had a very reasonable excuse.

Try NoteTab (even the Light version). http://www.notetab.com/ I've memories of using it with files of several MB. "BTW, as long as you're playing with NoteTab Light. I found a setting where you can set the maximum file size. It was set at the default max of 2 gigs." http://www.pcreview.co.uk/forums/thread-1961456.php

"This is a celeb spotting thread after all...." When does the I-Spy book come out?

As posted by James Barber at http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,336529,467901#msg-467901 [typos corrected] "I did check some weeks ago with officers about people in yellow hi vis waste coats checking rubbish in the middle of the night. Categorically told not council officers. I then referred the matter to our local East Dulwich Police Safer Neighbourhood Team. IF you have more instances please report it to them."

As posted by James Barber at http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,336529,467901#msg-467901 [typos corrected] "I did check some weeks ago with officers about people in yellow hi vis waste coats checking rubbish in the middle of the night. Categorically told not council officers. I then referred the matter to our local East Dulwich Police Safer Neighbourhood Team. IF you have more instances please report it to them."

Many thanks James. Apologies if I missed an earlier one. I'll copy your remark to the relevant threads.

I've asked James Barber in the Councillor thread http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,336529,467872,page=27#msg-467872 to check whether _any_ checking of waste is done by council officials. This one definitely sounds not. The car description sounds to me a useful enough piece of intelligence to pass on to the police. They are meant to have people who collate information. Car numbers, of course, are even better.

James, have you seen this thread, and another one I mention in it, about characters dipping into waste/recycling bins at odd hours? http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,467780 I think it would be useful for someone to get an authoritative statement from the council as to whether any checking goes on and if so, what the protocol is in what circumstances it happens. That would then leave the way clear to reporting any other sightings, with car numbers etc, direct to the police.

This recent thread's more relevant: Shread your docs - Paper recycling bags are been rifled through at night

Is this about anything more than the discovery that flat shoes are actually healthier and more comfortable than ones with a built-in tilt?

This board seems like a game of Pelmanism sometimes. http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,294776,297220

I've cycled down that way to visit Darwin's house at Downe.

In Jul-Dec 2009 there were only 2 appeals against Southwark bus lane infringement decisions, as compared with 742 for London overall. I'm wondering whether this indicates that Southwark made few such decisions, or whether they were seen as indisputable. I suspect it's the former, and wonder what the figures will be for this half-year. Is this camera car a fairly new arrival?

The parking appeal statistics for Jul-Dec 2009 are in the March 2010 PATAS newletter. http://www.parkingandtrafficappeals.gov.uk/newsletters.htm. 971 appeals were submitted against Southwark decisions; 713 of them were allowed. Some of the column headings (eg DNC) don't seem to be explained anywhere, so some qualification of that figure might be needed. I'm emailing them to suggest that more explanation would be useful.

Lovely> I am going to go back tonight and look Why not check the photograph on the Southwark website too? Perhaps best start here. http://www.parkingandtrafficappeals.gov.uk/TMAAdjudicatorsHome.htm

Two robins happily wandering about the garden and feeding. One of them presumably a juvenile, as no red breast yet, though not much smaller. And the redbreast still occasionally chose to take tidbits to the other and feed it, beak to beak.

> And they have used the picture we took to post here... Without your permission? Send them an invoice.

Traffic Management Act 2004 s.86(3) (Prohibition of parking at dropped footways etc.) "The second exception is where the vehicle is parked outside residential premises by or with the consent (but not consent given for reward) of the occupier of the premises. "This exception does not apply in the case of a shared driveway."

>ring fenced That's what the nice man at Equitable Life told me once.