ianr

Now eight trains showing as cancelled over the next 90 minutes, and only these currently shown as running: 17:06 London Bridge 17:09 Beckenham Junction (via Crystal Palace) 17:22 London Bridge 17:25 West Croydon (via Norbury) 17:39 London Bridge 17:42 Beckenham Junction (via Crystal Palace) 18:03 London Bridge 18:03 Wimbledon 18:17 London Bridge 18:23 West Croydon (via Norbury) 18:32 Wimbledon

Just checked ED departures, http://www.southernrailway.com/your-journey/plan-your-journey/live-running-information/EDW/departures/, and just as well I did. The 13:06, 13:20 and 13:36 to LB are all cancelled. And this will presumably have follow-through effects. Add: Their web page says "A line side fire has caused damage to the signalling system between West Norwood and Tulse Hill, resulting in services towards London being diverted via alternative routes. This has caused congestion, as more trains than usual need to use the remaining open lines.", and says that disruption is expected until 14:00. So possibly things are in a recovery phase. At 13:29 no trains after the 13:36, up or down, are shown as affected. (The EDF clock is 11 minutes slow.)

[The thread about a dog recently taken from Sainsburys, and now recovered, is in the Lost, Found or Stolen section at http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?31,1786160.]

After checking a very old Samsung phone and its manual, I suggest: Open up your contacts entries one by one. You may well be told whether the entry is in the phone or the Sim. Among the menu options will probably be a Copy option: you will be offered the other location as destination. You may have to do this for each contact separately. Open your inbox (and then whatever other folders you keep text messages in). Open each message in turn. Among the menu options will probably be one offering a move to the other location, or maybe a Copy one, as with contacts. Google Samsung and the model number and phone and manual, and you may be lucky. Beware of manuals for other Samsung products with the same model numbers. They may turn out to be for a microwave oven. It's the phone one that will be more useful. A phone that is not very old may also, as Zelig suggests, offer options for bulk selection for copying.

> Went to Mem's. Guy tried to be patronising. Tried? Was the failure in achieving the attitude , or in its expression, or its effect?

#There's a small PDF file of Southwark textile banks dated June 2016 http://www.2.southwark.gov.uk/download/downloads/id/13595/textiles_clothes_and_shoes_june_2016 that is I guess Renata's source. It covers the whole borough and includes what I take to be a charity associate in each case. Lewisham also list one outside block flats 270/332 Wood Vale, SE23 3DZ. I found the list on the Southwark website only by doing a word search, and wasn't able to find any other useful reference there to textile banks or to acceptable input and its use. Some other councils provide accessible lists, and better information. Westminster, for example, say "Please ensure all materials are clean. All items suitable for reuse will be sold at a Scope charity shop in London and any items unsuitable for reuse will be recycled." https://www.westminster.gov.uk/textile-recycling. Haringey say "The clothing will be collected by LMB and hand-sorted to separate the good quality clothing that can be used again from lower quality or damaged items which can then be shredded and made into cloths. More information on how LMB sorts and recycles clothing can be found on the company's website..." http://www.haringey.gov.uk/environment-and-waste/refuse-and-recycling/recycling/street-recycling/textile-recycling I'm now assuming that Southwark's acceptance policy and practice is similar.

> If you are sending someone personal details via email you really should break it up in > different emails, with a different subject so it does not create a thread. A mail reader can thread messages in a mail folder using just the chain of references in the header, regardless of subject or even addressee. Your strategy, if it's to be reliable, should avoid sending the successive posts using the Reply button. Even then there's still more than enough information in the headers to enable them to be linked. Encryption, or splitting the content between different communication channels, is more advisable for high risk content.

.

I see from the www.gov.uk/government/publications/planning-appeals-procedural-guide that the 2 March submission date for the statement of case is in fact that for the one from the council. So definitely the appellant's statement is the major thing awaited. I don't know if there's anything fresh in his other documents or whether they are just copies from the original application. The guide www.gov.uk/government/publications/planning-appeals-dealt-with-by-written-representations-taking-part may also be useful to anyone thinking of taking any action. The letter from Southwark will probably have referred to it too. I did look into the timeliness of the appeal submission (decision date 8/12/16, appeal form received 8/12/16), but the wording of the regulation which I take to be relevant is "serving on him, within the time limit. ... The time limit ... is six months from ... the date of the notice of the decision". > have others received the letter or just us in the flats- says can add comments by the 27/2/2017 What mode of submission, and submission to whom, does Southwark say the 27/2 deadline applies to? I hope it's not at odds with the dates stated by the PI themselves: Start Date 26 January; Interested party representations deadline 2 March (ie 5 weeks later).

If after those checks you are still in doubt about an URL, this article gives details of a couple of link scanner websites that can do some useful checks on them. http://www.pcworld.com/article/248963/how_to_tell_if_a_link_is_safe_without_clicking_on_it.html

The documents received by Southwark are at http://planbuild.southwark.gov.uk:8190/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=externalDocuments&keyVal=_STHWR_DCAPR_9564164. At "View associated documents" see the Appeal Form of 12/12/2016 for a list of documents (Statement of Case, and supporting documents) submitted, and the Start Letter of 30/1/2017, sent by the Planning Inspectorate to Southwark, for the procedural timetable. You can see that the Inspectorate will have access to all comments previously submitted (bar any that commenters choose now to remove), and that there's a deadline of 2 March for submission of any additional ones. The Planning Inspectorate web page for the appeal is at https://acp.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/ViewCase.aspx?caseid=3164939, where there's also a timetable. I don't know whether the fact that the submission deadlines for both submission of the appellant's Statement of Case and of other representations are the same ( 2 March) means that the Statement of Case isn't made public before then.

A resulting Temporary Restraining Order, made in MA: https://twitter.com/joshua_eaton/status/825600563622604800.

> A curious thing to say. They weren't suing on the basis of injury. They were suing > on the basis he exceeded the executive powers. Incidentally, they won. In Judge Collyer's own words in her 12/5/16 judgment: "The House?s injury depends on the Constitution and not on the U.S. Code." The notion of justiciable injury seems to be deemed relevant. https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2014cv1967-73 The executive appeal against that judgment seems to be still pending. The latest I've found, http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2016/12/29/rapid-developments-in-house-v-burwell/, gets us to the beginning of this month. There's an overview at wikip:United_States_House_of_Representatives_v._Burwell

Root around for a folder such as C:\Users\[username]\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows Live Mail. This article also mentions some variety of deleted WLM folders. https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windowslive/forum/livemail-email/how-can-i-restore-my-pop3-mail-folders-which-were/07ad9f56-1138-4805-acaf-ae1f589bfc45

There was this attempt, after a House of Representatives vote, to sue Obama in 2014 over Obamacare. I don't know its outcome but it seems to have been regarded as an oddball action: "Legal scholars have questioned whether any member of Congress can prove injury by the president and therefore prevail in court." https://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/31/us/politics/house-votes-along-party-lines-to-sue-obama.html. The conventional Congressional remedy would seem to be counter-legislation. WikiP:ExecutiveOrder:Legal conflicts. Current lawsuits are summarised in Wikipedia at Darweesh_v._Trump. The main article for the shemozzle seems to be Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States.

Can someone please educate me on the recycling of clothes and shoes bit. I hope it means that they will take any that are not fit for re-use, but from which they can retrieve material usefully (as eg with shoddy). Is that the case?

What do you make of the conditions attached to its use? "The trap may be used only for the purpose of killing stoats and rats. The trap must be so placed that it can only be entered by way of an artificial tunnel which is suitable for the purpose." http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2015/1427/contents

Thank you. As in the attached, I assume. I don't think I've noticed ones like that before. Are they common? The van does seem to have gone now anyway. An orange level warning: banana skin and mush observed on pavement, west side of Crawthew, just south of junction with Frogley. It was a bit too messy for me to remove.

Do you mean the Goodnature A24 Rat and Stoat Trap?

The law requires a request from the occupier of the premises before any action is taken: http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,1712143,1712564#msg-1712564

> The only Windows 7 disk I have is Vista to Windows 7 upgrade. I have one of those. I tried booting from it on my W7 machine, and it did lead to an Install option. PS: actually, that was probably from running its setup.exe via Explorer. And iirc, it did offer an installation that preserved personal files and programs. But what it does offer on booting, via F8 Advanced Options, is repair and diagnostics utilities.

A DOS or Windows version of Unix tail utility will get to the file end, if Windows Event Viewer doesn't. This is a functioning very lightweight instance which I've just tried out on a 32MB file: https://sourceforge.net/projects/tailforwin32/ Forget that. Try this. https://support.microsoft.com/en-gb/help/928228/how-to-analyze-the-log-file-entries-that-the-microsoft-windows-resource-checker-sfc.exe-program-generates-in-windows-vista

Email just received from South Eastern: Dear passenger, As you may already be aware, a freight train derailed at Lewisham this morning, causing significant damage to the track. As a result, there is significant disruption across the network which may impact the journeys you make today. There are currently no services from Lee, Mottingham or New Eltham. And some trains between Cannon Street, Charing Cross and Tunbridge Wells will be diverted to run from London Victoria. Evening peak trains between London Cannon Street and the Medway Towns will now depart from London Blackfriars, the departure time will be the same as the normal time. There is also a shuttle service running between Sidcup and Dartford via Crayford. Ticket acceptance is valid on other routes including London buses and London Underground, and will be in place again tomorrow. We are also offering Delay Repay compensation at double the normal amount for those who have seen journeys delayed by 30 minutes or more due to this incident. Travelling tomorrow? While repairs to the track at Lewisham continue, there will be some changes to train services so please make sure you check before you travel.

SimonM Wrote on 28 September, 2007 14:45 ----------------------------------------- > >>Can Sharon Stone please come to Customer > Services"! > Probably in-store code for "the knickers shelf > needs restocking"? :)) Sadly, "SimonM died this morning (30 Dec)" 2011 http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,810069,813183#msg-813183