ianr

Revelator

What does your lease say about responsibilities for maintenance?

Humument

Shaggy, what then do you make of the government policy paper available at https://www.gov.uk/guidance/status-of-eu-nationals-in-the-uk-what-you-need-to-know, particularly para.6 (which is more or less summarised on the page I've linked to).

Dbrskh, the answer to your question is Both. The three years is from s.6(2) of the British Nationality Act, on naturalisation. The five years is from the Immigration Rules / EU law, on leave or right to reside here. For anyone worried about the fine details of naturalisation, the HO internal guidance https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/naturalisation-as-a-british-citizen-by-discretion-nationality-policy-guidance could be useful. ILR certainly can be revoked, particularly for serious criminal convictions, and similarly even EU citizens with permanent residence can be deported. It was some of those cases, or rather those where a court found ECHR rights to outweigh the arguments for removal, that so got up Mrs May's nose in her Home Secretary days. You can also lose ILR by being out of the country for more than two years: see eg https://www.gov.uk/returning-resident-visa. Which is pretty much the same as EU law on permanent residence, as in Article 16 of Directive 2004/38/EC.

> And it's gone as well now. Admin obviously decided enough was enough on that one. Still visible, fwiw, at http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.eastdulwichforum.co.uk%2Fforum%2Fread.php%3F5%2C1848218&oq=cache%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.eastdulwichforum.co.uk%2Fforum%2Fread.php%3F5%2C1848218&

> Tried the MAC last night and the log on screen did > appear after the apple logo, but not for long. I saw similar brief or intermittent signs of life in a laptop that had experienced a drink soaking, when I tried powering it up up every few months. I eventually had a go and managed to bring it back to full health, by giving the motherboard a gentle cleaning with cotton buds and isopropyl alcohol, concentrating on the bits where there seemed to be residues crossing the tracks.

There's been no generator noise on the Hospital site at night for at least a week. That came from the personnel cabin that was in the middle of the whole plot, which was used by a night watchman. Syd Bishop removed it last week, and their last bit of plant was I think removed yesterday. The signs put up now that Kier have taken over speak of security via CCTV monitoring. Kier are working on the school side of the fence. Their own cabin has a generator that backs onto Melbourne Grove, and is substantially louder in my estimation. It's been waking me up when switched on at seven or even earlier, even with window and curtains closed. In the daytime, if there's other random engine noise that it merges with, it's usually no problem. But if on its own it's difficult to ignore. Attached is a small sample, recorded at 7.17 this morning with a mic between the curtain and the window pane. The mic was probably unsuitable, so I've amplified the recording a bit. For comparison, the radio in the background was at lowish listening volume. I understand that Kier have actually been setting up a communication channel for local residents, that I was going to go through. But as the matter's been raised I might as well add my own twopenn'orth of information here as well.

http://planbuild.southwark.gov.uk:8190/online-applications/ was ok for me just now. There's no need for any logging in.

http://discussion.femalefirst.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=735333 https://forum.smartcanucks.ca/422646-does-anyone-know-where-i-can-buy-sensolatino-sunglasses-like-canada/ Now piss off.

Loz Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I would rather change the law that put the onus on > the rider that, if they are not wearing a helmet, > any injury from a crash in a chase is presumed to > be their fault, not the police. > Do you mean 'liability' rather than 'onus'? Would the presumption be a rebuttable one? > Major part of the problem solved. What specific defect in law are you actually seeking to remedy?

>> Now renamed to "The Monty Bojangles Company Ltd". >> ?? > > What, Hope and Greenwood or Sugar Mountain? It looks more like a takeover of H&G by Monty B. The owners of Monty B. acquired all the H&G shares in 2015 and became sole directors. It remains to be seen whether they'll keep it on as a distinct brand. That said, H&G Ltd was actually being run as a dormant company from at least 2008, and still was one in February 2016, so it's not itself been the trading entity.

There is perhaps some comfort to be had from https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=in+the+exact+same%2Cin+exactly+the+same%2C+in+the+very+same&case_insensitive=on&year_start=1700&year_end=2008&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t4%3B%2Cin%20the%20exact%20same%3B%2Cc0%3B%2Cs0%3B%3Bin%20the%20exact%20same%3B%2Cc0%3B%3BIn%20the%20exact%20same%3B%2Cc0%3B.t4%3B%2Cin%20exactly%20the%20same%3B%2Cc0%3B%2Cs0%3B%3Bin%20exactly%20the%20same%3B%2Cc0%3B%3BIn%20exactly%20the%20same%3B%2Cc0%3B.t4%3B%2Cin%20the%20very%20same%3B%2Cc0%3B%2Cs0%3B%3Bin%20the%20very%20same%3B%2Cc0%3B%3BIn%20the%20very%20same%3B%2Cc0.

You can find leak and maintenance reports on a map at https://inyourarea.thameswater.co.uk/, and enter your own report if you want. It seems to be the same map for several categories, with the same markers. Entering any local postcode will do to see it. The only one that might relate to the OP seems to be planned maintenance a bit further up Rye Lane, scheduled to start today.

Oyez!

Although the page you were both looking at has the title "Hope and Greenwood | Covent Garden London" it's actually on someone else's site, www.coventgarden.london/hope-and-greenwood . The actual H&G website is http://www.hopeandgreenwood.co.uk (from which it ppears as if they're currently selling only via Sainsburys).

> According to previous threads these aren't legal fines and can > be ignored. Does anyone know the current situation? The Supreme Court rejected a crowd-funded test appeal in November 2015, holding that there was a contract and that the ?85 penalty charge stipulated within it as a means of protecting the company's legitimate interest was not "extravagant, exorbitant or unconscionable". http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/cars/article-3303189/Parking-ticket-disappointment-UK-motorists-Supreme-Court-rejects-chip-shop-owner-s-85-appeal.html https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2015-0116.html

McSporran, I've pm'd you.

They're probably all gearing up for the sesquibillion celebrations on Friday.

borborygmus

> No it's not on our website . As no one knows the password . I think if you ask Fasthosts nicely they'll be happy to reset it for you, assuming you want to keep it on. Your domain is going to need renewing soon anyway.

Jules & Boo > Cash in hand is generally not declared which is actually fraud. Fraud?

The cheapos are 'Advance' tickets - a limited number available, at varying prices, on just a few trains each day, and you do have to use that train. The Oxford ones can get as low as ?5.40 for a single.