ianr

"What if the ticket office is closed, or the station does not have a ticket office and the automatic self-service machines are out of order? At most locations there is more than one self-service ticket machine and these are regularly maintained so it would be unusual for there to be no self-service ticket machines available for you to use. At stations where there is only one self-service machine there is usually a further machine called a Permit to Travel. This is normally located near the station entrance/exit or beside other self-service machines. You should insert the maximum number of coins you have with you in the Permit to Travel machine, up to the value of your journey. Press the button and you will be issued with a permit to travel. This permit must be exchanged for a valid ticket at your first opportunity, be that on the train or at your destination and in any case within two hours. You will be given credit for the amount you paid for the permit when you exchange it for a valid ticket. If the ticket office is closed or not available and self service ticket machines or the Permit to Travel machines are not working then you will not be charged a Penalty Fare." - Southern Penalty Fares leaflet http://www.southernrailway.com/download/17308.2/penalty-fare-leaflet-december-2011/ (284kB).

There was a previous valuation on 1 April 2010.

I was able to reproduce your problem by deleting the eastdulwichforum.co.uk phorum_session_v5 cookie from my computer. I think its absence is the most likely cause. It might have happened if your browser configurations were recently changed, eg not to accept cookies, or to delete them at the end of each internet conection. Or it could have come to the end of its one-month life and got deleted automatically. But in that case I'd expect your situation to have beeen back to normal after your next login. If you do want to actually check cookies and settings, you can probably do so via a Privacy menu item within Preferences or Options somewhere in your browser main menus. I'm incidentally curious, about why people want to be always logged in. I tend to do so only when I want to post or to access PMs, and then I logout again.

Perhaps better not to give it a name then.

I'm doubtful that they're doing anything actionable. They don't seem to be engaged in the "selling or exposing or offering for sale of any article", which could bring them within the Street Trading provisions of the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1982, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1982/30/schedule/4 if Southwark have adopted them. Nor do they seem to fall within the nuisance parking provisions of the Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/16/part/2/crossheading/nuisance-parking-offences, which stops businesses placing cars for _sale_ on the highway within 500 metres of each other. I doubt Zipcar are doing either. Are there any other possibilities? Their accounts for the year to 31/12/2015, btw, declared an operating loss of ?3.5 million. https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/04525217/filing-history

If gm99 is correct about a variation in operating model, the cars that are not in dedicated bays would presumably show up on maps like this one: http://www.zipcar.co.uk/car-hire-london? If they do, you might want to ask Southwark whether their use of non-dedicated parts of the road is in breach of their contract with the council.

The Southwark public notice announcing the Rye Lane plans is available at http://www.2.southwark.gov.uk/downloads/download/3116/frequently_requested_traffic_orders. The actual TMOs are attached to the response to https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/en/request/traffic_management_orderplan_for. Or is the actual cycleway later than 2010?

I find being anxious to find something in a hurry is usually not a good state in which to search efficiently. But if there's a high probability that it it 'must' be in the house, more searching, maybe following Applesdpider's suggestion still seems to me the possibly least costly strategy. Does she have any idea of when and why she last accessed it? Don't push her for an instant response if she's already stressed. But if she can put the question at the back of her mind, perhaps something may pop up spontaneously from the depths in the next day or two.

Have they not made their way to the light of a window? I think they'd then be happy to exit if you open it. If you only have windows that partially open you'll have to be very patient though, given the smallness of their brains.

A couple of meaty threads to be getting on with. http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,1783127,1786230 http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,1624090

Firefox recently began reminding users of login connections that are insecure, ie those that use http rather than https. The only one I've been told of so far is here: 'form action="http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/login.php"', in the module of the same name. Worth a quick edit?

> But just wondering if anyone uses one on here Some previous reports: http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/search.php?5,search=%22indoor+aerial%22,page=1,match_type=ALL,match_dates=0,match_forum=ALL

All candidates: https://candidates.democracyclub.org.uk/areas/WMC--gss:E14000673

Anyone wanting to know Edith Williams' cause of death can apply for a copy of her death certficate: Deaths Dec 1918 Williams Edith O 19 Camberwell 1d 1872 Attached is a copy of a typical ad for WRAF Immobile Branch recruits. ? 2017 Findmypast Newspaper Archive Limited (British Newspaper Archive http://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/ )

James Barber Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Managed to attend walkabout along Lordship Lane with council officers and fellow councillor > looking at breaches of planning and advertising rules. Determined to tidy Lordship Lane up. James, does that include A-frames? Is there an accessible map showing the curtilage of each shop? Notwithstanding that LL is not a red route (and so, I assume, not a TfL regulated highway), London Travel Watch's booklet "Inclusive Streets" http://www.londontravelwatch.org.uk/documents/get_lob?id=3756&field=file 2.7 MB ) is useful on the law and positions taken by various London borough councils. Is the attached still current for Southwark?

Unduly lenient sentence referrals can arise in a number of ways: Areas may consider the sentence unduly lenient; interested parties including victims or the bereaved may contact the CPS; media coverage may prompt the Area to consider the case; the Attorney General may also be contacted directly, by MPs, peers, pressure groups or members of the public. In those cases, the AGO will request papers from the Area with casework responsibility for the case. http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/s_to_u/unduly_lenient_sentences/#a05 I don't see that anything precludes the AG from spontaneously taking an interest in a case, but in any event he is going to have to consider the CPS papers and opinion, or find himself at risk of having leave refused (as in the case mentioned in the "How the decision is made" section).

A few weeks ago I saved four plastic punnets of supermarket plums from perdition, a couple of hours before the end of their best-before-end day. They were still bone hard. Two of them I left in a sunny position, and the other two I put in the fridge. A week or two later the ones left out were still hard, but the ones in the fridge were soft and juicy and ready for eating. My best guess is that the ones in the fridge benefitted from the ripening effect of some ethylene in there, which might have come from some apples or pears or maybe a half-eaten banana. So I'm now experimenting with another punnetful, bought on 22 May. As of yesterday, left in the sunny place, they were still hard. So I added a couple of prunes and wrapped them all in a plastic bag. More news later. I hope I haven't offended or traumatised them.

If you need to walk ED's mean streets and you value your own safety, be sure you pack one of these. http://csimg.webmarchand.com/srv/FR/280066258435118238632/T/340x340/C/FFFFFF/url/klaxon-de-clown.jpg

Penguin68 wrote above: ------------------------------------------------------- > I have also received a reply from the CEO's office ..... > It was perhaps an irony that one of the reasons given for > the need to move from Silvester was parking problems - Over the last few Sundays there have been 6-8 RM vans comfortably parked at the back of the delivery office in Pellatt Road, with on one occasion one in Crystal Palace Road.

Two months' archive of LCY flight track data can be replayed at https://www.londoncityairport.com/home/page/track-aircraft-in-your-area.

The London City Airport (LCY) schedule has the first arrival shown as 06:50. https://www.londoncityairport.com/travelandbooking/arrivalsanddepartures Past Heathrow (LHR) flight tracks, including position, time and altitude, can be seen at http://webtrak5.bksv.com/lhr4.

> There are bye-laws against dog shit already so why do we need a PSPO? There are already the Southwark Composite Dog Ban Byelaws, which specify a long list of public grounds and open spaces as "canine faeces removal areas". http://www.southwark.gov.uk/assets/attach/1369/Composite%20Dog%20Ban%20Byelaws.pdf The Explanatory Notes to the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 ( http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/notes/division/5/5 ) contain the following: 186.The public spaces protection order will be different from the powers it will replace in the following ways: a. It can prohibit a wider range of behaviour, which makes the new order more like the ?good rule and government byelaws? made under the Local Government Act 1972, but with a fixed penalty notice available on breach (although some current byelaws do allow for fixed penalty notices to be issued).; b. There will be less central government oversight than with byelaws, and no central government reporting requirements as with designated public place orders. This will reduce bureaucracy; and c. There will be lighter touch consultation requirements to save costs (for example, there is no duty to advertise in local newspapers). It also looks, from the examples in the above Guardian article, as if a PSPO can be applied over a very broad area.

An angle grinder sort of sound? As in http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,1803925?

Duty

More information in the recreational What's On section, http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?6,1814429.