ianr

Sir Tony Redmond, Chair of the Consumer Council for Water's London and South East Region, was interviewed on R4 World At One today. He seemed fairly confident, iirc, that the accounting was transparent and easily monitored, and that CCWater would be very much on the case if there was any breach of the undertaking not to tax the customers for the incompetence. What actual powers CCWater has, I'm not sure. It's governed by a string of Memoranda of Understanding, and they have a Vision, and Values; details of all of which can be found at https://www.ccwater.org.uk/. I should have a recording of the interview that I may check later - it'll also be at http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b08j99fr - but there'll doubtless be much more varied media coverage and comment over the day. Fines go to the Exchequer, don't they?

> He appears to have a broken wing and is often seen strolling around the manor with a friendly crow. That sounds like a children's book, maybe waiting to be written. The first library book I borrowed, called Hoggie and Bear, featured an even more odd couple.

> Thank you. It's a Canon 600D with various lenses, not all Canon but all compatible. Commiserations. Do you have the lens and camera serial numbers? Without those or any other cogent evidence, it may not be easy to prove that any items are actually yours. I've looked at a sample 600D photograph online, and fortunately at least the camera's serial number is included in the Exif data. What the best strategy for use of this data, apart from passing it on to the police, if it's not already on one of the online peoperty databases such as https://www.immobilise.com, I'm not sure. I don't know whether publishing it now would increase your chance of recovering the items, but you could have a look at whatever Immobilise have to say about reporting it via their site.

In which direction?

rendelharris Wrote: ------------------- > One thing in favour of the householder is that > anyone convicted of a crime such as attempted > illegal entry would have to ask the convicting > court for permission to sue the householder for > the damages incurred in the commission, permission > which would be most unlikely to be forthcoming. Where does that remarkable provision reside?

brambles Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Thanks Sally it's a private car park > No signs up That's very unusual nowadays imo for a car park that's issuing charge notices. Where is it? If there is no notice, there is most probably no contract.

> https://www.nsandi.com/childrens-bonds Children's Bonds maximum holding is ?3,000 per child per issue according to the Ts&Cs.

A Southwark News report on flytipping in Southwark: https://www.southwarknews.co.uk/news/southwark-5th-highest-flytipping-rates-figures-show-incidents-declined/.

'Twas this: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b053bq4l ETA: Possibly: ie I can't remember anything else freudy this week.

> The admin is certainly still a joke, emails go unanswered and I don't know of a > parent that doesn't get the comedy erroneous bill each month that they have to query. I suppose you could take this up with a director. One of the two is actually a local accountant, as is the company secretary. :) He also, from the latest AR01 submitted, seems to be the current sole owner. https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/09180733/officers

The bit between Edwards and McDonalds is just the right length for an all-out sprint as part of your high intensity interval training.

> We usually get a booklet explaining where the money goes. I've found the 2017/18 edition online at http://www.southwark.gov.uk/assets/attach/1069/Council%20Tax%20booklet%202017-18.pdf (1.2MB). The GLA precept is conventionally included _within_ the council tax figure. But then there's the new Adult Social care precept. From page 4: "This year we have decided to increase council tax by 1.99%, and have decided to use the flexibility offered by the government to support Adult Social Care through a precept equivalent to 3% of council tax, giving a total increase of 4.99%." See page 6 for an example of how it's added to the basic Band D charge.

> be aware that the council will tell the builders who complained and you may get harassed..... That was personal information which it would be unlawful for a council to release, and public servants should be habitually aware of their duty not to disclose it. See for example two other councils' assurances to potential complainants about confidentiality: http://cms.walsall.gov.uk/index/environment/pollution.htm and http://www.ambervalley.gov.uk/environment-and-planning/pollution/statutory-nuisance-noise.aspx. It's also information that is exempt from an FoI request, as shown in this failure of a person complained about to obtain the information via an FoI request: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/i_would_like_the_name_and_addres. If a complainant subsequently appears as a witness in court, that's a different matter, and outside the control of the council. Was it a Southwark officer that you believe released your identity?

> Ianr yes I was told the same. Bob, I was quoting you and simply asking: which of A or B? Anyway, for anyone inclined to fact-check the rumour of simultaneous closures ... The sole director/owner of Xoco Ltd of 44LL, incorporated March 2016, has the same name and birth month as the person who took over Chutney Jane Ltd of London SE, another restaurant business, in September 2015. So possibly the same person. I've seen no evidence of any other catering directorships in his name.

> I was told by another restaurant that they owned 3 others and they all closed on the same day. Is it known whether the "they" refers to the company that owns the restaurant or to the company's owner?

> Attachments: SN 9 March 2017 (1200 x 1600).jpg (460KB) There's a legible full version of the article, with additional photographs, at https://www.southwarknews.co.uk/news/southwark-diocese-approves-council-plans-hundreds-new-burial-plots-fought-cemeteries/

> "the exact same build as our proposal" What do you mean by that?

Does the meeting not have its own keynote(s)? Or doesn't it matter, as long as the punters purr? Yanis Varoufakis, should keep them awake.

> Stand up for human rights - email the White House now > Thank you for your tireless support, > Laura Trevelyan Laura, I won't be doing so.

There's a commentary on the new executive order and link to it at http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/03/06/516408650/trump-signs-new-order-blocking-arrivals-from-6-majority-muslim-countries

And the winners were ... https://www.nabma.com/great-british-market-awards/.

http://www.2.southwark.gov.uk/downloads/200066/markets_and_street_trading Or email: [email protected] as on http://www.2.southwark.gov.uk/info/200066/markets_and_street_trading.

A chocolate teapot would be a good match for a blunt Swiss army knife.

Usenet uk.legal.moderated could well be helpful on general procedural matters. Details at http://uklegal.weebly.com/. It's also accessible via Google groups, if you don't use a newsreader, at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/uk.legal.moderated. There's actually a recent thread about a counterclaim there now.

As reassurance, the Government notes that that people shouldn?t be too concerned because copyright holders are not known to come after people who make a backup of their computers. ?The Government is not aware of any cases of copyright holders having prosecuted individuals for format shifting music solely for their own personal use,? the IPO spokesperson says. From https://torrentfreak.com/itunes-is-illegal-under-uk-copyright-law-150805/