macroban

Harris Federation exclusion policies.

Punch Taverns' debt The data are a little out of date, but I doubt things have improved since. Could be with commerical propety prices falling they now really have negative net assets. With turnover down and input costs up they could be having difficulty meeting interest payments and borrowing covenants. Bounce back? Perhaps not this time.

Is Punch Taverns' business model broken?

The statutory start date cannot be 2008-03-07 as there is no public notice on the premises.

This may a year when there are two Budgets.

I thought the road was named after Bishop Copleston. Could be wrong though.

Update?

Dotty thread.

Newspaper update.

> oh, hang on a minute... East Dulwich got non-stick frying pans.

Another "commentator" says BC Partners paid ?390m, but what's ?100m between private equity friends?

> ... the family own the freehold on the building don't they? So no rent... But maybe a mortgage or bank loan.

Thanks, scor46, for confirming that our "financial journalists" are wrong in equating a 4p increase in duty on a pint with a 4p increase at the pump. Hands up who fell for this one (I'm not going to snitch).

Oh *Bob* are you misled so easily? It could be that the only archaeological fact of interest to the East Dulwich Forum is that man invented beer before he invented the wheel.

Quite amusing! Now is it an iron-age or a bronze-age burial mound? The map also shows the site of a Roman fort. Who is responsible for propagating this stuff?

I get the impression that some of the usual suspects are trying to subvert a child's homework. Not nice. Each year the London Archaeologist (magazine) does an annual supplement of London fieldwork reports. The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies publishes Britannia once a year which also contains fieldwork reports. Over the last 40 years there has been next to no evidence of any local Roman archaeology this side of the Old Kent Road. Earlier works of synthesis dating before 1970 also have no mention of a Roman fort in this area. The topography of the area and the known distribution of Claudian forts in South East England indicate that an undiscovered Roman fort is unlikely. One couldn't prove there is no Roman fort without excavating the whole of East Dulwich, but if someone says there is one they should be able to adduce some evidence.

Isn't that an ITMA "joke"?

There is no Roman Fort. The is no Bronze Age burial mound. There are data here. [use the right-hand search box]

Look on the sunny side of life. It's better than the 1931 Budget.

Mr Carnell wrote: > Basic rate of income tax is down, so if you're a low earner you'll pay less. Selective criticism, Mr MacGabhann?

>> As demonstrated by the removal of the 10% income >> tax band for low earners. Some of us are gonna be a lot worse off, because of this Quite so, but Mr Carnell didn't notice.

> Basic rate of income tax is down, so if you're a low earner you'll pay less. As demonstrated by the removal of the 10% income tax band for low earners.

The budget introduces the ?4 pint for East Dulwich?

> Correct me if I am wrong but isn't a bus a "public" place and therefore the smoking ban should be enforced. It's a "working place" and there is a smoking ban.

> Woodcraft Folk We pledge allegiance to the Rochdale Pioneers....