In the end an election is about choosing a government and a parliament. We are clear where we stand, in spite of our misgivings. We want to see Labour re-elected to government and we want to see more Liberal Democrats returned to parliament, at whichever other party's expense. What we do not want are more Tory MPs, so we therefore urge progressive voters in the overwhelming majority of Labour or Liberal Democrat held seats to rally behind the incumbent party. Only in a tiny handful of seats - see elsewhere in today's paper - is it safe for Labour voters to switch to the Liberal Democrats without the risk of allowing the Tories to win. Elsewhere, think very carefully before you vote. You are voting not just for yourself but for others, frequently less fortunate, whose life chances rest on your good sense. Wow - you're right after all. What a ringing endorsement for the man that is. Vote Labour and hopefully he'll bugger off soon enough. And it certainly doesn't prevent a vast number of writers and columnists having dissenting views - not something you'll see much of at GQ. I'm not really sure what you're trying to do here either - do you actually support or like these awards. Or are you just using any opportunity to try and highlight hypocrisy amongst the press? Something akin to shooting fish in a barrell. Your oft-claimed love of tabloids and their "honest as the day is long, guv" approach would fail miserably if one decided to pick apart their weather-vane approach of who to support come election time. The Guardian may have its failings, but at least it's consistent. Me in 2005? I think I was back at home in Sutton at that point so probably voted Lib-Dem to keep the Tories from winning. D_C in pragmatism shocker!