Ladymuck

DJKillaQueen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I've just finished reading a book called > 'Injustice' by Professor Danny Dorling... Seen this?

As per the Churchill Dog....OH YES!

900

DJKillaQueen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I defy anyone to put Miliband/ Clegg and Cameron > in a line and spot the difference! Any Miliband in particular?

SteveT Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > From a motorists point of view... Now that's really constructive. Thanks Steve T. Any other drivers with constructive viewpoints/observations like Steve's?...anything which helps cyclists/drivers assist each other has to be a good thing. And if the end result = less accidents, then even better. (tu)

katie1997 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > erm... I was trying to stay out of this thread but > it was nice to see a posting from HAL80000000000 I too am chuffed to see a posting from HAL2000000, Katie9887636. It's been a while. As to whether superheroes are tight-arsed, I really do think this is one of those questions worthy of debate in the Drawing Room.

karter Wrote: > My turn to gamble please. i'll take number 176. To Penge? xx

*Bob* Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You might as > well be dropping toenail clippings in with the > basil - and then guffing on top of the magimix > bowl. URRRGGGGGHHHHHHHH..... PS: how did you know I have a Magimix? *creased up laughing*

*Bob* Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > That's all they're good for. That's not true...they are vital for a quality pesto sauce. My pesto sauce is never the same when I have run out of pine nuts.

katie1997 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- >..we may > even find our chances of winning at imaginary > bingo to be greater than this lottery run by a > dog... A mad dog at that - he's very lovable though...bless him (it).

*Bob* Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Pine nuts my ass! :-S

Oooh Katie217289, could I join you, Maude, and Ethel on Thursday? Fancy my chances with bingo. Esmerelda x

Could you translate that lot please Quids? Names (or pictures!) would be good too. Cheers.

Sandperson, You are a GENIUS! That is immensely helpful - thanks.

I'll have 200 please Willy-Woof. Loving this thread BTW xx

omniprescient Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- (I think the law stating that lights > fixed to the bike must be non-flashing has been > repealed?) Interesting. I tried to verify the policeman's statement but couldn't find anything. Perhaps it's because - as you say - the law has been repealed. It would be good to know the position for sure though - anyone? >I also have some flashing lights fixed > to the spokes of my wheels - good for sideways on > visibility. All in all I'm lit up like an effing > christmas tree! Brilliant! At least, in the unfortunate event that you should become involved in a traffic accident, the driver will not be able to say : "I didn't see him/her" - which is what I have been told each time I have been hit by a car!

Applespider Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- >I always think that the flashing draws > the eye a little more and makes it more obvious > but a driver pal said that he finds them more > irritating. Apparently, there is (somewhere) an old archaic law which says that bike lights should be static (i.e. non-flashing). This is because flashing lights are less visible from a distance. A policeman told me this. He also said you are unlikely to be done for cycling with flashing lights. I have static lights and an extra rear light set to flashing so that I can be seen clearly both from a distance and close up.

DJKillaQueen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > At least I have breasts! > > *waits for another smack in the gob* *smacks, kicks, punches, scratches, pulls hair, spits, hisses, smacks again, pokes eyes and legs it* >Donated wool is not allowed. I'll recycle wool then. Might even start a little cottage industry of DHFC scarves made with recycled wool. Then you'll give me some respect! And when I'm rich and famous you'll rue the day you insulted my fried eggs. Rue the day I tell ya! Yeah! *That's told Her Majesty* HAMMER-LETS

DJKillaQueen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > HA HA...if you manage to knit a Hamlet scarf for > less than a fiver then I will run topless once > around the pitch..........lol Yeah...just the once should be more than sufficient......eeeeeeeewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww *plots to complete cheap Dulwich Hamlet scarf in depths of winter - preferably when snow/sleet/blizzards are forecast*

99p shop does massive balls of wool - you wait, I will look the bees knees and you will be SO jealous! Now who to teach me?

Weegee has posted one up on here...the Whats On Section I think.

DJKillaQueen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Yeah we all can see the Muck is trying to blame > the Gooner for her misconduct......but Muck is > Muck wherever it stands...... Not me mate... And yes...roll on the next game. I might even take up knitting and knit myself a pink and blue scarf. How much is a season ticket?

Oooooh well done indeed Brendan. Many congrats to you and Mrs. B. Remember, never too young for the skateboarding lessons.

DJKillaQueen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Lady who?......was no lady on da terrace dat day > init......>:D< Hear that LadyGooner? That DJKQ may well be The Queen, but I fink she is well out of order innit. *chucks bog roll onto pitch*

Actually, I think you two (DJKQ and Weegee) are exceedingly wicked talking about LadyGooner like that. It's not nice...not nice at all. Shame on you both.