TE44

http://m.naturalnews.com/news/036298_Merck_scientists_False_Claims_Act.html notice link i added above cannot be acceessed, privacy thing I dont know? Heres another one. Scientist who worked for merk accusing company of falsefying records on safety and efficciency.

bodsier, link to public records, inquest into the shooting of Mark Duggan. http://dugganinquest.independent.gov.uk/evidence.htm

Two whistleblowers, ex employees of Merck (makers of mmr) filed a federal false claim in 2010, link below. This case was under sign (no access to pubic) until 2012. Merck did not pursue a libel case against them.A few days later Chatom primary Care also filed against Merck.I believe this is also under sign still. http://www.examiner.com/article/whistleblowing-virologists-sue-merck-for-alleged-falsification-of-mumps-data I have not vaccinated my children, now all adults, as the years have went on and information, although bias and confusing from both sides, is more easily available through computers,I have found thhe pharmaceutical companies actions criminal. There is so much conflicting information we can only do what we believe to be best.

Try again, link to "does Telepathy conflict with Science" last one didnt wor. http://realitysandwich.com/161239/does_telepathy_conflict_science/ This piece mentions scientists who believe psi phenomena maintains the theory of quantum physics.

Heres N interseting piece "Does Telepathy conflict with Science" http://consciouslifenews.com/telepathy-conflict-scien0ce/

Whether science believes there is proof or not, i think artificial/ Synthetic telepathy gives some idea what there concept of it is.

Heres a link to Cochranes battle to bring this to light. This is an issue of safety, trust and obvious waste of money. http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001201

http://www.pmlive.com/pharma_news/pharma_slammed_by_mps_for_withholding_trial_data_530974?SQ_DESIGN_NAME=2 It really annoys me that these questions were not answered years ago, below is a link to Donald Rumsfelds link with this vaccine. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-rumsfeld-makes-5m-killing-on-bird-flu-drug-469599.html

Goverment underfire for rejecting EU food bank funding. http://welfarenewsservice.com/government-fire-rejecting-european-union-food-bank-funding/

Ha ha El Phibe my mums thoughts as well, said she'd never heard the like, Yes that makes sense Otta, I think a lot of my mates felt the benefits in the same way as you would if your birth had went well, or even when it didn't its a chance to do something for yourself. Thhis is not saying intervention is not needed, but Many of my mates have felt in previous births intervention escalated to the point they felt helpless, with no chance of being able to go with what they felt only take instruction.

I replied after reading others posts regarding validation on safety of whatever treatment they decide to take. As I have said above. This is not an argument, I merely replied to posts regarding the moral duty to prove safety especially when so much money is being made. Yes it may have went off topic but for me it is connected. I did not eat my placenta, i put my 1st in the fridge intending to bury it and plant some herbs, my mum came the day after so it was put in the attic as she would have been horrified. When my husband took it down after she left was crawling with maggots so we buried it on spare ground across from where we lived then.a few month later a bootsale opened.we had a laugh over this but unfortunetly the road was to polluted to pick the herbs that grew there. I have friends that believe by eating the placenta it helped there recovery, I see no reason not to believe them. Its an individual choice. When marketing and safety becomes part of the discussion I cannot help but look at what that means.

It is no big secret thAt lives have been put at risk in the marketing of drugs. If expressing this takes away the good that is done, does that mean by ignoring it that takes away the bad. Here is Dr Deborah Cohens view, "Drug Study Secrecy Puts Life At Risks". http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2011/11/science-medicine-secrecy-drug-studies-lives-risk/ This is not a handful of examples. I put the animal link up (which seems to be redirected) in relation to views where the vadilty of animals were not valid. I just thought it strange the same reasoning would not come with approved medicine.

Link to an interesting article on safety of drugs approved by FDA. There is no doubt that alternative therapies should be used with care, and thought for interactions. http://www.pcrm.org/research/animaltestalt/animaltesting/dangerous-medicine-examples-of-animal-based-tests it has been shown time and time again that medicines approved to be safe by FDA does not guarantee safety. I find this article interesting as it is lookin at animals being used to decide safety. Animals natural instincts have been mentioned on this thread, and yet most of tbe approved drugs involves looking at animals reaction, in an unnatural enviroment. I believe like others on here, each to there own.

Yes buggie it seems the JCVI [joint committee on vaccinations and immunisations] have decided one dose will suffice. I cannot find any studies disputing trials already done showing two doses are more effective. http://www.medimmune.com/docs/default-source/pdfs/flumist_pi.pdf Link to official document for flumist/fluenz, showing trial on shedding.

http://www.bioportfolio.net/report/18521-flumist-seasonal-influenza-vaccines-forecast-and.html I expect the people who paid for this market analysis on flumist wont lose out.

It seems like a lot of confusion over ordering and dosage, this vaccine has a shelf life of 16wks. Any child having the nasal spray who has not already been vaccinated for flu, should have 2nd dose in 4wks. There is also confusion overgp ordering in january. This fluenz (nasal spray) is also known and been administered in US as flumist, nurses have found the green book overriding manufacturers advice, this may have bbeen brought up to date recently but has not helped with confusion.

http://www.medicines.org.uk/emcmobile/medicine/25084/spc summary of product above. This is a live vaccine, wondering if it was explained to parents whos children recieved this, That children should not come into contact witb immunocompromised. http://www.practicenursing.co.uk/forum/topic.aspx?TOPIC_ID=20916 http://www.practicenursing.co.uk/forum/topic.aspx?Topic_ID=20489&whichpage=2 2links above from a nurses view. Conflicting info on dosage.

Hopefully this time your child will not be picked on BB100, regardless of there denial, they must give a reason for delaying the exam. If only there was honesty from the beginning,where management acknowledged your raising of the issue, or bringing there attention to it instead of ignoring you. I hope now they willl listen to your concerns.

Bb100,How did you find out your childs teacher is unqualified, I can't find any figureson unqualified teachers being employed,was wondering if the school told you. I'm assuming this is being monitered to establish a clear picture of how it is working/not working. This info should be available.

http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/education-19017544 Above is a link to when goverment changes began,regarding unqualified teachers. More detail on the goverment website (can't copy it), I don't know what changes if any these changes would make to the goverments initiative "troops to teachers", considering they were in a different situation within the regulations of unqualified teachers. A DFE spokesman said that John Nash, parliamentary under secretary of state did not take any decisions which affected schools in which his charity was involved. "The decision to do this was made when Lord Nash became minister to avoid any conflicts of interest". (pimlico) This was in response to acall by labour. This brings a feeling of deja vu, when Jack Straw was a school governor at Pimlico and labour was pushing the Pfi (private financial inituitive). Only then, the parents had more of a say, calling for his resignation over conflicts of interest.

Bb100,I would let head know you are aware that your child was bullied after previous complaints. This can be done without your child knowing, and insist any form of communication should be between you the compainant through the official channels stated in there procedure. They have not seemef to follow this up well but to take it out on your child is so wrong.

Charter became an academy in 2010 lightweight.

I'm shocked bawdy-nan, it doesn't seem that long ago, when that might only have been a possibility.

The complain procedure is very different in an academy,especially after going through the procedure and not happy with the outcome. The funding agreement is between the secretary of state and the sponsors, leaving the parent in a different situation legally. The EDA(my post above) deal with acadeny complaint for SOS. There have been freedom of info requests asking the number of complaints and the action taken, There is a question pending now, although up now no figures have been released. Sorry cant put up links.

I think you can only complain to Education Funding Agency (an executive agency of the DFE), after you have been through the schools complaints procedure.There addres 53-55 Butts Rd, Earlesdon Park,Coventry, CV1 38H or visit www.education.gov.uk.There are set response times for each stage of complaint, which may be to long considering this needs to be dealt with now. You can try the complaints and schools liason manager 0208 7266000 ext 65496. Good luck. Edited to correct phone number