Marmora Man Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > THere is however, a problem with career > politicians. Paying politicians more as DC > suggested will not, automatically, ensure a higher > calibre of politician. There's a long waiting list > of wannabe politicians at the current rates of > pay. > > I've suggested before that there should be a > minimum experience requirement for MPs - getting > elected at the age of 21 with a background of > school life and university politics is not good > for the necessary breadth of knowledge and > experience the House should have available. > > Similarly there should be a maximum term to an > MP's career unless he / she becomes a minister / > shadow minister. To be able to spend 25 years as a > foot soldier on the back benches voting with the > whips again reduces the variety and breadth of > experience. > > I have no problem with paying Ministers more > appropriately - nor with providing them, and > general MPs, proper recovery of expenses incurred > - provided the scope of such expenses is similar > to those in other walks of life - ie genuine "out > of pocket" costs incurred in the interests of the > role. Not for bath plugs, TVs, cushions etc. With views like this and the many other imminently sensible and properly thought out ideas you often post it always baffles me how you can possibly support the current Conservative Party.