Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This shop has an extensive, long and unhappy casefile with Southwark Council enforcement officers. The immediate land outside the shop is owned by the shop. Selling cars in this way is not normally allowed. How the shop owner can afford a shop that doesn't appear to trade is a great mystery.

The forecourt should have become a right of way but wasn't enforced as such before I became a councillor - hence the ridiculous looking fencing.


Things do appear to have recently got worse.

I'll ask council officers to investigate and hope to resolve.

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He sells cars. It?s part of his business. The

> section of pavement in front of his shop is his. I

> don?t think there is anything to stop him from

> putting a car up for sale on it.


Agreed, but he doesn't have the right to drive across the bit of pavement which isn't his, to park the car there in the first place.

njc97 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Siduhe - why wouldn't he be allowed to drive over

> the pavement?



Its illegal.


From the Highway Code:


145

You MUST NOT drive on or over a pavement, footpath or bridleway except to gain lawful access to property, or in the case of an emergency.



[Laws HA 1835 sect 72 & RTA 1988 sect 34]

We've been down this path before (probably in the archived forum section that is no longer searchable). Yes an offence to have driven onto the pavement but still have to proove he did it. Given the number of helicopters above East Dulwich he might just as easily have dropped it in from above.

He is just a normal person obviously feeling the strain of the credit crunch and is selling a few cars to earn a bit of extra cash if he has a ltd company he can trade and do a lot of things once you have a company


Could you please explain why it gets on your nerves this i can not understand is it that it puts the NEW POSH LORDSHIP LANE image out


i am so glad i do not live in dulwich as there are so many stuck up posh folk who have now seemed to have taken residence in the area


over priced pubs which sell overpriced food which in my eyes is not great value for money

over priced fruit an veg shops butchers fish mongers


i was born in dulwich and it has now changed to much

I agree with Mellors - it's not lawful access unless you have permission to cross the Council-owned bit of pavement.


I looked at this for someone else on the forum recently - my basic understanding is:


s34 of the Road Traffic Act prohibits the driving of motor vehicles on anything that isn't a road (and specifically mentions driving on footpaths).


Some bright people figured out s34 only applied to "driving" cars across pavements to park, so started pushing their cars across to try and get round strict wording of the legislation. The result was a TMO which applies across all of London (as far as I know) which makes it an offence for any motor vehicle to park or to move a vehicle across a pathway for the purposes of parking (unless it is specifically exempted and signs indicate that you may park partially or wholly on the footway or there is a lawful access such as a drop kerb).


In short, unless he can show he picked up the car and dropped it into place without going across the rest of the pavement, he's committed an offence.

So...


On another thread someone was talking about the cost of dropping a kerb outside their house, and someone proposed a bit of pipe or wood as doing a reasonable job to save a grand.


However, according to this, unless he has a dropped kerb, transiting the pathway to park his car is illegal anyway?

tiger ranks Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He is just a normal person obviously feeling the

> strain of the credit crunch and is selling a few

> cars to earn a bit of extra cash if he has a ltd

> company he can trade and do a lot of things once

> you have a company

>

> Could you please explain why it gets on your

> nerves this i can not understand is it that it

> puts the NEW POSH LORDSHIP LANE image out

>

> i am so glad i do not live in dulwich as there are

> so many stuck up posh folk who have now seemed to

> have taken residence in the area

>

> over priced pubs which sell overpriced food which

> in my eyes is not great value for money

> over priced fruit an veg shops butchers fish

> mongers

>

> i was born in dulwich and it has now changed to

> much



I object to him blocking up one of the parking bays on Lordship lane...nothing to posh Lordship Lane, and believe me I'm not posh.


we're all feeling the strain during the crunch but that doesn't mean we can monopolize the highway to make a few quid.

he's got a shop, try selling some of the stock his lease allows, because I bet he hasn't got permission for car sales

It does look so bizarre though. One random (pretty crap) car on the pavement outside a shop on a narrowish pavement (can't remember what was being sold -i have been past a few times). It isn't a car lot and i don't think the car being there is going to make it sell faster. can you imagine if other shops did the same?


I don't think it has anything to do with "poshness" though. Even if it was a mclaren or ferrari, it would be inappropriate parked there. Actually a ferrari would be larger and would encroach on the pavement.

i don't know , i sat opposite a young lady in the cafe costa having a nice cup of tea , when she decided it was time to feed her baby, she struggled to get it going as i stirred my tea glancing from natural milk bottle , to the bargain across the way for ?595 ! all strangely inappropriate but charming none the less.

If the guy owns the land, then he is allowed to put anything he likes on it, ur all lucky he hasn't parked a big pile of steaming shit there... I would just to piss you all off.


This shop reaks of being a front to me, I'd be interested to see what he is putting through the books. I'd hazzard a guess that whatever it is, it was never 'sold' from those premises and probably never existed in the first place.

ruffers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does he actually sell hi-fi? Seem to remember he

> had stuff piled outside a while back at cheapo

> prices.


Seems to still sell hi-fi stuff, I always thought there wasn't much in the place until I ventured inside one day. He's got quite a bit of kit in there, was quite surprised. Looked all above board to me, I was only after an audio cable but he was very helpful.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So top of Lane. Local Sainsbury, middle Co Op and M and S and bottom Tesco Express…..now everyone should be happy except those that want a Waitrose as well…0h and  don’t forget M and S near ED Station….
    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...