Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I can't believe (or maybe I have not seen the thread ) that no-one on the forum has mentioned the look of the The White Stuff shopfront . The boarding is down and shopfittings and decor seem in place, boxes of stock everywhere it seems. Its looking good and looks as if it will be opening very soon.


K

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1188-the-white-stuff-lounged/
Share on other sites

I bought some glass from the 'shabby glazier' for a picture frame and I would never wear White Stuff clothing.


Nevertheless I am delighted by the constant and rampant gentrification in the area so I'll give a thumbs up to the arrival of geek couture.


Is there a difference between White Stuff and Fat Face? If so then I hope Fat Face take the other unit.

Lordship_bod


the new teashop will be opening near Karavan - it used to be the chandelier/French furniture shop.


I am currently keeping myself sated with the pastries in Mon Petit Chou. (Very nice - but tend to sell out quickly).


Despite my moniker, alas I have no links with Superquinn.

  • 9 months later...

Cassius Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think their clothes are really boring and safe.


True, but jeans and a shirt are never going to be revolutionary are they.


Personally I'd never wear Vivienne Westwood because I'd look a bit of a prat outside of Covent Garden.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...