Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yup, I had the same experience with se23 dot com - one of the forum rules that the "Webmaster" has is that you are not allowed to discuss the forum. I persisted, did the bad thing twice and have now had my posting rights revoked.


Maybe the EDForum (which is much more of a benevolent dictatorship) could have an area for se23 dot com refugees?

So the user "lovely" also went onto wikipedia and deleted the link to the East Dulwich Forum from the East Dulwich page! And then put a link to the other forum (whose links I've had removed from this post) calling it "The community forum for East Dulwich".


If you're going to be competition for this forum Steve please play fairly.

Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So, as we suspected it transpires that the user

> "lovely" is behind the other forum. Why did he

> have to be so underhand and sneaky about it by

> coming on here and lying? It's not really a good

> basis on which to run a community forum is it?


It was all worth it for the comedy denial though. Like a child covered in chocolate who claims not to have been anywhere near the biscuit barrel.


What a plum.

char1ie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm sure it's fine to publicise website owners:

> http://www.who.is/whois-uk/ip-address/eastdulwichforum.co.uk/

>

> Charlie


Hmmm ... the link says Mark has opted to hide his address because he's a non-trading individual. Surely not correct, in regard to the sponsored ads here?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • We did fine for 300 years with the Royal Mail before the current "competitive" shambles was introduced. Now we have multiple companies with multiple vehicles making deliveries to the same streets every day, none of the workers are employees with decent working conditions or any job security, and consumers have to deal with x different distribution networks and apps and platforms and drop-off points... https://postandparcel.info/12422/news/uk-royal-mails-monopoly-to-end-on-1-january-2006/
    • That's certainly the narrative that runs ad infinitum on the Forum but I wonder how true it is. Speaking for myself I'm very happy M&S, Superdrug, Pret and, in the last century, Sainsbury's arrived and judging from the business they do I'm not alone.
    • There are Christmas lights?! Or a, I missing something?
    • Though it's often the big corporates who dig deepest. For small independents that's a bigger ask, decorating, when they do their own premises is cost enough. And we're normally happy not to have the big corporates in LL. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...