Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I remember reading a thread on this issue before and just wondered what other peoples experience had been..


I'm about to go on maternity leave and currently pay ?243 out via a salary sacrifice scheme which goes towards my daughter's nuresery fees.


I think there was some suggestion on a previous thread that if (like me) you are only going to be paid SMP then your employers have to continue making the ?243 contribution for you each month. Maybe I am mis-remembering this as it seems too good to be true but I have a meeting with HR next week about my maternity leave and if it's right then I'd like to be able to argue the point... I think my boss will have a heart attack at the suggestion of it!


Would love to hear any thoughts on this...

Hi EmmaCC, I am not a HR professional, but I believe this is correct. While you are on maternity leave, you continue to accrue all benefits you receive as part of your package (such as car allowance, travel allowance, health allowance etc) including childcare vouchers if you currently accrue them. You have the option of cancelling them, however legally you are entitled to still receive them as your employer cannot take away a benefit from you while you are on mat leave. As you will not be receiving a salary, there is no way for your employer to recover the cost from you, so your employer is effectively contributing on your behalf. When I discussed this with my HR department, we joked that this would just about cover the childcare cost for the KIT days I am planning to work during my mat leave!

This sounds too good to be true!


Is there any website that I can look at to clarify when an employee is entitled to retain the childcare vouchers?


I was under the impression that if you contributed to the vouchers yourself via salary self sacrifice and it wasn't part of your salary package eg as a company car might be, then you could not expect your employer to continue making payments for you. You could carry on payment for the vouchers but it would come out of your SMP.


When I go on maternity leave next year I will receive a 6 week bonus and then drop to SMP, does anyone know if I am eligible to apply for continuation of the vouchers at my employer's expense?

JRT - see page 13 of this

Excerpt:

What must the employer continue to provide to a woman when she is on statutory maternity leave, as a result of these changes to maternity leave legislation?


These non-cash benefits are what she is entitled to under her contract of employment, apart from sums payable by way of monetary wages or salary. These non-cash entitlements would include:

o non-cash vouchers, such as childcare vouchers which can only be used by the employee for qualifying childcare and are not transferable;


The converse is that for the first 6 weeks SMP (when you receive 90% of your average wages), those "average wages" do not include the bit of salary you have sacrificed in return for the childcare vouchers. Some employers will make up this difference but they don't have to.

Thanks njc,


I will take a look at the link although one more question, when I receive my SMP through work are they entitled to deduct the cost of the vouchers from this amount? Or are they not allowed to deduct anything from SMP?


Are they obliged to pay the cost of the vouchers only when I do not receive any SMP, ie in the last 13 weeks?

Typically for the first 6 weeks an employee is still responsible to pay for the vouchers. After this period if you are only receiving SMP or unpaid maternity leave, your employer is required to contribute on your behalf. If you have other flexible benefits (e.g. pension contributions), these must also continue while you are on maternity leave.

i'm on mat leave currently and am now earning SMP only (have been for the last 2 months). my vouchers are still being provided by my company, which i'm very pleased about. i remember reading busymum's thread a while ago and it was for that reason that i made sure to stay enrolled in the scheme.


Many thanks busymum!

Thanks so much for the info...I can't wait to raise it with my employer and see what he says. I work as a solicitor in a small but national law firm and will be interesting to see whether the partners at my practice feel they are breaking the law if they don't agree to it. It's going to be an interesting conversation...my boss employs mainly women in their 20s and 30s and I have often felt annoyed at the lack of any kind of maternity policy other than the statutory...I actually get on very well with him but he's notoriously tight so I know he'll be fuming at the thought of this!

jrt - you never have to pay for the vouchers. Assuming your employer only gives you the statutory minimum, in the first 6 weeks they give you 90% of your average pay - this is your pay after the bit you sacrifice for the vouchers. After that you will receive the SMP amount (without decuctions) and in the last 13 weeks you will receive nothing (but still get the vouchers).


This also applies to any other benefits you receive via salary sacrifice, e.g. pension contributions, bike to work etc. They have to provide all your benefits other than pay (e.g. health insurance, death in service insurance etc)


As busymum etc point out, this is a statutory right. If they try not to give it to you (or to deduct the cost when they shouldn't) then they are breaking the law.

  • 2 months later...
Apologies for reviving an old thread but I am having some problems with my pay and salary sacrifice for childcare vouchers. I haven't doublechecked but I am pretty sure 243 where taken out of my SMP every month. I then went on to unpaid leave for a couple of months. I returned to work in October. To my shock and horror I was charged ?1200 for childcare vouchers in December. I can only think that they are backdating to mid July when my SMP ended. Can they do this and should I try recouping the deductions made during the 3 months where I was on SMP? Any arguments I can put forward. Quite uneasy about it all because my head is also the head of HR and loads of redundancies are to be announced. thanks for any tips
hi they can't do that! otherwise my employer would have for sure! they cannot legally take deductions from SMP and they can't screw you for the entire amount when you get back to work. have you got a union? they can provide free legal advice on this sort of thing, hope you get it sorted.

Nikki - it's complicated, was it definitely SMP they were taking it from? That's definitely illegal - from the doc I linked to above "It is not correct to make deductions from SMP to reflect salary sacrifice arrangements."

Also they cannot "charge" you for anything. You signed an agreement to reduce your salary. Clearly your salary cannot go below zero, so they cannot take money from your for that unpaid period.


I don't think it's uncommon for companies to get this sort of thing wrong, I would have thought that a polite raising of this with relevant department would get it sorted. And I wouldn't have thought that your boss would look unfavourably on you for pushing to get back ?1200!

Another question...


My employer pays 9% pension contribution and I pay 3% from my salary. Are they oblidged to continue paying a certain amount even though I will only earn SMP and not a 'salary' as such? Or would my percentage contribution come out of SMP?


Thx

JRT - again it depends on whether or not it's a salary sacrifice arrangement for your contributions.


But assuming this isn't a ss arrangement, basically, during paid maternity leaves, your employer has to continue to make contributions as if you were normall employed, and will deduct 3% of your maternity pay (note you have the right to opt out, in which case neither you nor the employer makes the contribution). During unpaid maternity leave, there is no requirement for the employer or you to contribute.


If it's a salary sacrifice arrangement, then I think the employer would have to contribute all 12% on your behalf and make no deductions, but I'm less clear on this.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thanks for all of the thoughts. I have a letter from searches which outlines the scope of work but doesn't mention any work guarantee as far as I can see. I agree that next step is to check directly with the major works team. Tim .
    • I thoroughly recommend Jay from JK Electrical Contractors who is an NICEIC registered. NICEIC is the UK's leading certification body for the electrical contracting industry and conducts regular audits and assessments on all its members. It is the specialist trade body which certifies professional electricians.  Jay completed the installation of a 19 way consumer unit for us and works to the highest standards and our entire electrical installation is now fully compliant with 18th Edition of the electrical wiring regulations. Before installing the new CU he traced and corrected faults that had developed over the last 25 years -some of which were my DIY bodges that were non-compliant.  We now have an installation that is 100% safe and  reliable . His contact details are :- 0208 150 6450 [email protected] Here is what he installed for us.
    • I fully support this petition, however it will need to be shared far & wide to be effective. Also there is always a huge amount of interest / objection during the festival, but not so much when they start consulting for the next one, usually around January. It's crucial that everyone that has been impacted makes their voice heard then.  A couple of points which may be good to include in the wording (if it is still possible to amend?) - The total tickets sold are way more than 3000. The licence allows a capacity of up to 9,999, but this may include staff & performers etc. The published attendance for 2024 was:  Friday – 8,999 / Saturday – 9,512 / Sunday – 9,422 So that's c.28,000 people trampling & littering our park over three days - people who have no need or desire to take any care or consideration of our park.  - Gala claim for 2024 that "62% of all ticket holders were from Southeast London and 18% of these were from hyper-local postcode areas SE15 and SE22." So a bit of maths shows that means that around 89% of attendees were not what most people would term 'local'... - Gala have ambitions / plans to extend the number of event days to 6, over two weekends. They applied for a licence for this in 2024, but then withdrew it. Instead they added a "free" event, billed as a community day, to the existing 3 day festival, thereby increasing the event days to 4.  This would appear to be an attempt to set a precedent for increasing the number of event days, and it's inevitable that they will attempt to secure the 6 days they desire for 2026, to increase their profits further. Two weekends in a row of noise, disturbance & disruption would be unacceptable, plus an extra c.18,000 trampling & littering the park... - The site size has been increased. The claim is that it is to compensate for lost storage space due to recent flood alleviation works, but the area has increased by more than the area lost, and appears to have been used for attendee activity rather than site storage. Gala have often stated that the festival can only be located in the park because the footprint has been designed specifically for that area, and yet this year the footprint had been amended & extended without any apparent issues. Surely this proves that it could be relocated?  Apologies, I just can't help going into rant mode on this issue, but hopefully some of the above may be helpful in increasing the argument presented by the petition?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...