Jump to content

Serial poo-er in ED area


Recommended Posts

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> you'll work it out...


Like the constipated mathematician? (She worked it out with a pencil?)


Sorry about that. Anyway, I had a question: when the long arm of the law reaches the elusive Dulwich Dumper, what is the penalty? Is it the same as not clearing up after your dog? Assuming that he manages to avoid a charge of indecent exposure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

peckham_ryu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rendelharris Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > you'll work it out...

>

> Like the constipated mathematician? (She worked it

> out with a pencil?)

>

> Sorry about that. Anyway, I had a question: when

> the long arm of the law reaches the elusive

> Dulwich Dumper, what is the penalty? Is it the

> same as not clearing up after your dog? Assuming

> that he manages to avoid a charge of indecent

> exposure.


I used to rub my cats nose in her mess if she did it where it's not welcome... Maybe we could do the same to this fellow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This may very well be an unintended consequence of the gig economy - fill suburban roads with self employed delivery drivers and cab drivers, working long hours, with no public lavatories (much) any longer, and often at times when alternatives (caf?s and pubs etc.) aren't open and emergencies will occur.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rahrahrah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > You could be right penguin. I blame poober.

>

>

> Deliverpoo must also take some of the blame.


Maybe we could do something about it

Like raise NI contributions a bit to employ a cleaner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I live off Woodwarde Rd and just returned home to see a man (late 60s, white) coming out of the alleyway having urinated against the wall and left a large, steaming pool of it (he could have used one of two drains but didn't). As I didn't see him actually do it I asked if he saw who did as I now have to clear it up. He denied all knowledge but clearly there was no other reason for him to be there as it's a short passage ending in a security gate. Disgusting, selfish behaviour. Unfortunately not the same man as in the OP's picture or I'd send the police the photo I have taken of his car number plate.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw a pile of what appeared to be human extrament left totally exposed close to the corner of Underhill/Barry this morning at about 7.30am. Shocking behaviour when a public lav is just a brisk walk away in the park. I've never been so caught short that I couldn't wait, and even if god forbid that did happen, I'd rather 'keep it retained', than expose myself in the altogether on such a public highway. Disgraceful.


Louisa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A bit like this: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/apr/27/tory-staff-running-network-of-anti-ulez-facebook-groups-riddled-with-racism-and-abuse
    • Because the council responsible for it is far-left....   And you haven't answered whether it is worth diverting emergency vehicles because a few cars drive through the LTN and why some lobby groups have been so desperate to close it to emergency vehicles.    Emergency services hate non-permeable junctions as they lengthen response times....f you remember it's why the council had to redesign the DV junction because emergency services kept telling them they needed to be able to drive through it...but the council resisted and resisted until they finally relented because the emergency services said their LTN had increased response times....sorry if the truth gets in the way of a good story but those are facts. The council was putting lives at risk because they refused to open the junction to emergency services. Why? What could have been the motivation for that? So, in fact, it was the emergency services who forced the council (kicking and screaming) to remove the permanent barriers and allow emergency services access. So the council finally opened the junction to emergency services and is now coming back to re-close part of the junction.  Why?  Perhaps you should be asking who is lobbying the council to close the junction or parts of it or why the council is happy to waste so much of our money on it - who are they representing as even their own consultation demonstrated they did not have support from the local community for the measures? The results showed the majority of local residents were against the measure...but they are going ahead with them anyway.   In time, I am sure the truth will come to light and those rewponsbile will be held accountable but you have to admit there is something very unusual going on with that junction - its the very definition of a (very expensive) white elephant.    
    • A Roadblock that a civilised society wouldn’t allow. 
    • Now this is cycling  BBC News - Tweed Run London bike ride evokes spirit of yesteryear https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68900476  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...