Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I thought this maybe of interest to people living in The Gardens as I believe they're the gardens mentioned in the article that are owned by Tilt.


Grainger acquire portfolio of 309 units in London (taken from construction and maintenance news)


British residential property firm Grainger plc has acquired the entire shareholding in The Tilt Estate Company Limited, which owns over 300 residential units, for ?47.9 million. The total property portfolio is valued at ?62.5 million and is located in East Dulwich, London, SE22, with the majority of properties situated around a private garden square.


Two thirds of the properties are subject to assured shorthold tenancies and over 50 are subject to regulated or assured tenancies. They therefore increase and strengthen Grainger's existing portfolios. In addition, the portfolio is in line with the Company's acquisition criteria, as it offers a number of opportunities for Grainger's in-house property and asset management teams to add value. This is particularly significant to ensure the benefits from any potential long term upside in this improving area are delivered.


The portfolio currently generates a total rent roll of ?2.2 million per annum. A number of the properties are currently vacant and therefore offer immediate opportunities to enhance income and the assets' underlying value. The purchase, from Wainford Holdings Limited, has been funded from existing facilities.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The of an era. Tilt Estates really were a

> successful and predominantly family run business

> for years. I remember the old lady well, and god

> was she strict with her rents!


Yes, one of my earliest memories going with my mum to the Tilts offices and down into that little office with the rent book. One Christmas the old lady handing over a wrapped Christmas present although can't remember what it was. Certainly the end of an era.

Tilts used to donate a raffle prize in the annual garden fete that was held in the Village - the field by the old school. The prize was a week in a holiday apartment in a building they rented out (and perhaps owned too?) right on the river in Marlow. The only time I ever won a decent raffle prize was the summer I won this - and the Tilts people instantly gave me a free upgrade to the 3 bedroom apartment in the same building that actually overlooked the river, complete with shaded balcony where you could breakfast and feed the swans and watch the boats and anglers...


So I am sorry to see them go...:))

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...