Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Keef wrote:- With regards to his being "an icon", George Best is also described as such, and why should he be, but Becks not?


Mainly because Besty was a football genius and outshone anyone he played against, he made good competent players look slow and clumsy.


Rooney has some genius about him too rather like Gazza.


But for my money Best was the most outstanding player ever produced from these little islands, and Beckham is the end result of a publicity campaign which Besty created, being the first footballing superstar.

That's harsh Keef. After United won the European Cup in '68 with an ageing team that included a young Best they should have built the team around him. They fact they didn't and were eventually relegated only tells part of the story. The fact remains that as a player Beckham and anyone other modern day British footballer you care to name is not fit enough to clean the boots of the genius that was George Best.

David Beckham has made the most of his undoubted talent as a footballer and his good looks to make a fortune. He has spoken out more vocally than many against racism and homophobia and seems on balance a rthoroughly decent man far, far better than many of his contemparies.



....and yet, and yet, us no marks from SE22 come out with the normal tall poppy shite like talentless, useless, lucky from the cosyness of our computers and our manifest lack of achievement



Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

Best had his last good game at the age of 27 in early '74 by all accounts, I'm quite impressed that anyone on this thread can remember him play.


I struggle to remember anything other than anecdotes from before my 20th year, so that would put the glory boy hyperbolists at 56 years old plus.


Subsequently he was paid by clubs such as Jewish Guild and Brisbane Lions. He wasn't famous for getting out of bed.


I saw him on telly, and he looked cool with his step-overs etc. Very much like Christian Ronaldo but with a heavier ball. When he didn't have the ball he looked more like a sulky Berbatov, refusing to get back and help his midfield.


In that sense I don't think Best deserves comparison with either Rooney as a striker, or Beckham who wasn't.


George Best, most overrated man in football, but evidently ahead of his time.

George Best, most overrated man in football, but evidently ahead of his time. wrote Huguenot



Well as I'm mid sixties and remember him well, especially on sticky muddy pitches as there was far more rain back in those days and as you so rightly point out, a heavier ball.


Best could keep on his feet better than anyone else, and when all around him were slide tackling only he stayed upright and danced around the recumbent opposition.


Jah you have to admit that both the drunken Gazza and the unfortunate potato faced Rooney, both had something extra in their game which most others could not match.


But Besty was always the best in my slender book of football hero's.

paragon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He only wear a pair of pants once. Which I my

> book makes him a legend.


At last something I have in common with David 'Becks' Beckham - he's a Primark man - who knew?


With 'slips' at ?3.00 for five, it's wear them once then press briefly into service as a dish cloth then dispose of them, not worth wasting Ariel Ultra Gel and Calgon tablets washing them is it?

Huguenot, clearly you are speaking as someone who has just had his first shave. Let those of us who were around at the time to appreciate the marvellous skills of, without doubt, one of the world's finest players. In my opinion, George Best ranks as one of the true greats; almost as good as the great Pele.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> David Beckham has made the most of his undoubted

> talent as a footballer and his good looks to make

> a fortune. He has spoken out more vocally than

> many against racism and homophobia and seems on

> balance a rthoroughly decent man far, far better

> than many of his contemparies.

>

>

> ....and yet, and yet, us no marks from SE22 come

> out with the normal tall poppy shite like

> talentless, useless, lucky from the cosyness of

> our computers and our manifest lack of

> achievement

>

>

> Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.



Totally agree with ??? overall theme.


He did start to put commercial interests ahead of football, especially with the move to the US. He should have realised his football mistake and come back to Europe to play, apparently Victoria is very keen on the Hollywood lifestyle though. There are also endless tales of Beckham going out of his way to do personal favours for individuals and charities (without any PR and off his own bat - before the cynics have a go).


Over rated? If only more people made as much of their talent as he did and when successful gave as much back.


Look forward to seeing him at Spurs.

HUGUENOT! Now you've done it!


George Best is my hero! Do you hear that?! My hero! He is solely responsible for my love of football and, to me, is the greatest player EVER! Oh how devastated I was when he left Manchester United.


Overrated? NEVER! Not in my book.

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He mighty purty. No talky though David, no talky.



I agree, he's nice to look at. So what else is important?





Edited to say that I do agree with Keef's tall poppy thing though too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello,  I feel as though our apartment is damp. I would like to borrow a dehumidifier to ascertain whether it is or not. Does anyone have a dehumidifier that I could borrow for a week?  thank you,    Brigid
    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...