Jump to content

Recommended Posts

you are correct on this occasion.


macroban Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Someone else - downsouth - told me my geography

> was lacking, but I'm under the impression that

> East Dulwich remains in the same place.

I was just a town planners dream in an open ploughed field then!


In Peter Akroyds London he talks about (not exact words) places having a sort of historical genetic make up so that no matter what you do to try and change a place the character remains intact. Camberwell's anarchic character/soul being an example.

lozzyloz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

...places having a sort of historical genetic

> make up so that no matter what you do to try and

> change a place the character remains intact.


Vauxhall Pleasure Gardens for me then!

We can't take being attached to a third-world country much longer.


I wonder whether this comment is merely overt snobbery, or whehter it's mixed with some covert racism too? Either way Maurice, I agree that you should not be living in Camberwell. You might want to reconsider South London generally.

The labling of anything in Britain as "third world" (trains, health service etc) is useful shorthand for "I am a bit of an idiot with no sense of perspective, you can safely ignore the rest of this post/ column/ party political broadcast etc"


And to avoid lounging, the answer to the thread question is "no".

I equate pissing in the street, jostling to get on buses, spitting on public transport, dropping food and other litter willy nilly as third-world behaviour. I've seen it in Camberwell and Peckham and in central London and Manchester and Leeds. I've also seen it in China and India. Nero

Sorry, Maurice, you'll have to try again. I've got no objection to needle exchanges.


So, no, still no entry to marvellous first world East Dulwich I'm afraid. You'll have to stick it out with the starving masses on the other side of the hill.

I had to add a somewhat serious point to this. Your syringe debate shows why I want to move into ED. In a matter of minutes dozens were out debating and those on different sides were rounding up troops off this board who can and will have an impact on a local issue. Whatever your views, ED has leadership for a community voice. Camberwell does not. A few talk ideas and such, but no momentum, no voice, no progress.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • We did fine for 300 years with the Royal Mail before the current "competitive" shambles was introduced. Now we have multiple companies with multiple vehicles making deliveries to the same streets every day, none of the workers are employees with decent working conditions or any job security, and consumers have to deal with x different distribution networks and apps and platforms and drop-off points... https://postandparcel.info/12422/news/uk-royal-mails-monopoly-to-end-on-1-january-2006/
    • That's certainly the narrative that runs ad infinitum on the Forum but I wonder how true it is. Speaking for myself I'm very happy M&S, Superdrug, Pret and, in the last century, Sainsbury's arrived and judging from the business they do I'm not alone.
    • There are Christmas lights?! Or a, I missing something?
    • Though it's often the big corporates who dig deepest. For small independents that's a bigger ask, decorating, when they do their own premises is cost enough. And we're normally happy not to have the big corporates in LL. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...