Jump to content

Recommended Posts

To give Shaun Wright his due, he really believes he is in the clear on this, or he's in denial, or he needs the money, or he's being economical with the truth etc.


But a man who resists Theresa May and Nick Clegg, the red tops and Uncle Tom Cobleigh has won a bit of respect from me.


Of course he won't last

aquarius moon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What is all this Guardian nonsense?

>

> If you hate it, don't read it and there would be

> no need for a six page thread.

>

> Simple.

>

> (read the Mirror or Star instead)


Or the Mail ;)

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I used to do crosswords.

> Telegraph is nice and vanilla, indy is usually

> doable.

> Could never get into the guardian one.

>

> Private eye most satisfying.


Love a good crossword, it's a peculiarly English thing, and I love them.

aquarius moon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What is all this Guardian nonsense?

>

> If you hate it, don't read it and there would be

> no need for a six page thread.

>

> Simple.


Not really simple at all. The Guardian does the best journalism in the UK. No contest.


But, its opinion pieces are barking mad, wildly inaccurate, rather sexist and, in the case of Rotherham, it turns out heavily blinkered. The latter has possibly/maybe spread to its otherwise excellent investigative journalism.


It's a all a bit of a curate's egg - parts of it are excellent. The rest smells more than a little rotten.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> aquarius moon Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > What is all this Guardian nonsense?

> >

> > If you hate it, don't read it and there would

> be

> > no need for a six page thread.

> >

> > Simple.

>

> Not really simple at all. The Guardian does the

> best journalism in the UK. No contest.

>

> But, its opinion pieces are barking mad, wildly

> inaccurate, rather sexist and, in the case of

> Rotherham, it turns out heavily blinkered. The

> latter has possibly/maybe spread to its otherwise

> excellent investigative journalism.

>

> It's a all a bit of a curate's egg - parts of it

> are excellent. The rest smells more than a little

> rotten.


Have you not expressed reasons why you should like it as a newspaper? Otherwise might it not be propaganda?

  • 4 weeks later...

If you wanted a defining article on how stupid the Guardian opinion pieces can be, you could do worse than this little gem.


http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/sep/28/kebabs-train-tickets-teach-you-about-britain


Apart from the rest of the awful attempt at satire, has anyone ever seen PMQs on a TV in a barbers shop? And who knew that "boisterous behaviour, coarse language and even violence" only started in the working class thirty years ago?

Whilst I'm not a lover of this particular publication, I'm somewhat surprised at the level of venom directed towards it. One post I saw states "The Guardian. Wrong about everything. Always." Hmmmm

The Mail is far more despicable, as is the Sun, the others aren't much better, and just as deserving of your scorn and derision.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Which is exactly why Rayner had to go - don't be the sleaze attack dog and then not keep your own house in order - the really shocking fact is she didn't go the moment this came to light because she knew what advice, and the advice to seek proper tax expertise that was given to her in writing by the very people she was trying to throw under the bus - she clearly thought she might be able to spin her way out of it. When you look at the facts, the advice she was given and when and her behaviour in the last few days it has been scandalous and just shows the contempt for the public intelligence some politicians have. Interesting to see a very unscientific vox pop on BBC News last night but a lot of her own constituents seem to want rid of her as well and to be honest if you have to lose your cabinet role for this breach of the rules then you should probably lose your seat too. That is the hypocrisy here and why a lot of people don't like politicians because they're all the same.
    • Hi all, I’m after a stereo amp in working condition. Not necessarily anything fancy, as long as it works. Thanks
    • You are missing my point, there are a few here who are rabidly anti Labour.  And have lost sight of the many scandals associated with their party.  I've not made excuses for Rayner, rather I am inferring that it is hypocritical to go on about one of the major parties whilst ignoring your own dirty washing.   You are not making sense.  I expect half the country likes a drink and a sizeable number likes a vape.  What is your point?
    • If you read the article posted above, it is all very carefully worded. However I've found this: https://uknip.co.uk/news/uk/uk-news/peckham-rye-park-attack-man-seriously-injured-august-2025/  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...