Jump to content

Bin Laden - dead


SCSB79

Recommended Posts

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And yes I have plenty of understanding of how

> governemnt, politicians and councils work thank

> you very much.


But of course..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DJKQ is the first person in the world to accuse the Obama administration of neo-conservatism! You heard it here first!


Seems that Obama is a Muslim/neo-con/immigrant all at once! Poor guy must be mighty confused. Go and speak to Donald Trump DJKQ - perhaps you can both wear tin-foil hats to protect you from the governments mind-probes.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Conspiracy theorists are so embarrassing.

>

> Shot despots being so more photogenic than those

> blown to shit for example

>

> You are the Donald trumps of the world


What evidence do you have that he was blown to bits and not shot?. His body was carted off to Afghanistan (a landlocked country) before then being dumped at sea. So I'm assuming it was largely intact and not blown to shit.


I just think it was a dumb move because it just fuels the fire for future theories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whilst I'm no conspiracy theorist, it's hardly surprising that after all the lies around Iraq and the blatant deceit of trying lo link Saddam to 9-11 that no one believes a word the president says, so profoundly has the institution been damaged, first by Clinton and then much more severely by Bush.


That said it would be fankly bizarre to make this claim now under a false pretence.

I do agree that in terms of PR it has been handled woefully badly and the decision to 'bury at sea' without so much a snapshot released to bolster the claim is very odd indeed.

It does leave you wondering if he's really in some dank cellar in Colombia or Saudi Arabia with some nasty outsourced men getting medieval on his ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems unlikely that Bin Laden would have been 'found' now for political reasons. There have been plenty of other times historically where it would have been expedient to find him, not least for the Dubya legacy.


I tend to agree in general with the points about the dumping of the body at sea, but not for the same reasons.


It's an obligation under Islam to bury bodies within 24 hours, and the outcry if this hadn't taken place would have been extremely destructive. Hence whether it was dumped or not dumped it needed to be seen to be disposed of. A land burial would have risked becoming a shrine or the body being dug up again for any number of unhelpful reasons, so was out of the question.


I don't really see the benefit of holding the body if it can't be used for propaganda purposes. I mean what are they going to do? Examine the brain for evidence of evil?


So on balance if there was a body, I think they probably wanted to get rid of it as soon as possible.


That doesn't mean he's not somewhere extremely unpleasant at some uncomfortable midpoint between life and death.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

frierntastic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DJKQ is the first person in the world to accuse

> the Obama administration of neo-conservatism! You

> heard it here first!


No I did not....talk about reading what you want to read.....I referred to the previous administration. Get it right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that the lack of proof along with the past behaviour of American adminstrations is the issue here isn't it. Because the only people who are really going to benefit from the use of conspiracy theories are surely the Jihadists themselves. Without proof they can always claim, as they have done before, that Osama Bin Laden is alive and well. We've had no end of fake videos with lookalike impersonators for example over the past years.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Totally agree Willard...they showed photos of the

> bodies of Saddam Hussein's dead sons for example.

> Surely the most wanted man in the world would

> share a similar postumous image.....if not from

> the government, from the mobile phone or camera of

> the many who would have had a hand in the process

> of killing and then disposing of him. But if the

> Americans say it's true, we should believe them of

> course.......


EXACTLY. Where are the photos/video footage?? So the US authorities say his DNA was a 100% match to that of his relatives...proof please?? Could have been anyone of his relatives in that compound he had about 300 offspring!


Frierntastic... I'm a 32 year old woman I don't need to be deemed as 'cool' - as you put it - to be 'anti-establishment'. Seriously, get over yourself mate.


Captured, killed, given a religious funeral and buried at sea within in 24 hours my backside..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever you think of the US administration, they are not stupid enough to make this announcement without it being correct.


Whether he has been captured or indeed killed will keep conspiraloons going for decades.


A dead Bin Laden avoids any messy aftermath & further opportunities for PR & agitation by the AQ franchise.Whether there was any attempt to capture him alive is a further debate - though I would suggest that it was accepted that he was going to be executed if captured alive anyway. Another Che.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where's the conspiracy?


The US was never going to let him get away. Buried at short notice at sea to avoid a shrine, preferred dead than captured for obvious reasons, pictures to follow. A sad case of imperial might vs theocratic fascism.


The best, and I admit entirely unlikely solution, was for a FOX/SKY televised, Bin Laden vs Rumsfeld, no holds barred bore-a-thon. Keep shouting and gesticulating until a meaningless fatigue sets in and Rumsfelds known-unknowns segue beautifully into Bin Ladens promise of a glorious afterlife. Then we could all go to bed and wake up again, same as it ever was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I liked the image created by David Letterman's "72 Vegans" awaiting OBL in paradise.


But as ever in these matters it's best to turn to Mark Twain who said:


'I've never wished a man dead, but I have read some obituaries with great pleasure.'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Taper wrote

-------------------------------------------------------


'I've never wished a man dead, but I have read some obituaries with great pleasure.'


Give me the old fashion drawn and quarter method, and send his parts to all the Al qaeda cells as a deterrent

( fast chance of seeing that)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Can anyone recommend a reputable damp specialist in the area please.  Reluctant to pick a random off the web and would really like a bonafide recommendation as know this work can be costly.  thank you
    • But you don't think the same protection should be afforded to those on the anti-LTN side...? Given the witch hunt some are be conducting to unearth which local residents are involved (see numerous examples on this forum), given the vandalism of the anti-LTN signs and interference with cars, labelling of anyone who opposes as some sort of petrol-head facist and given even Anna Goodman's tearing down of an anti-LTN poster you still think you only want anonimyity for those on one side of the argument? Does that not seem slightly hypocritical...it's why your first post on this issue entertained so many of us - it seemed ever so one-sided and summed up the challenges anyone who opposes the measures has to fight?
    • Hello again, Rubie, my cat, is still missing. He has been gone since 18th April.  Rubie is black and white, with black ears, a splendid white moustache, white front paws, and mostly white back legs.  Please check your sheds etc as he may be trapped, he’s a curious little thing.  I would really appreciate any help and suggestions. Thank you.
    • There is no equivalence between One Dulwich purporting to be a local organisation speaking for local people, and actually properly constituted organisations such as The Dulwich Society. A 3 -second google search reveals the openly published names of the trustees of Dulwich Society, so I can make my own mind up as to whether these individuals are coming at local issues with a particular slant. I can read minutes of their meetings online, and whilst I might not agree with their every position, I can have confidence that they are an open and fundamentally democratic institution. There is absolutely nothing similar in terms of publicly accountable information to be found about One Dulwich - no idea of who is behind it, who pays for it ( it is clearly expensive), and on what basis they make their decisions.  Given the Police involvement in the intimidation of people with a public pro-LTN view ( for which there is no equivalence in terms of severity of any incident for those with an anti-LTN point of view), I can fully understand why, for Dulwich Society's traffic sub- committee only, they want a bit of online anonymity. I also find it slightly disturbing that when The Dulwich Society current leadership asked the 'grouping' pushing for changes within it for a meeting to discuss their concerns, they refused it. Given the recent experiences of organisations such as The National Trust, the question can be asked - is something similar going on here?   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...