Jump to content

Recommended Posts

ratty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They will sadly drop off the end of the forum and

> into cyber oblivion.

>

> Not looking forward to Saturday. Seeing that smug

> crook back down at FP is going to turn many a

> stomach. Oh, and if he thinks that the SAS will

> protect him from the three digits he has another

> thunk coming! ;)

>

> My prediction? Pompey -7 Tottenham 9 sadly! :(




it's funny that HR is suddenly a 'crook' to any team's fans that he's left- despite any success he brought them, but is a messiah type figure when he's incumbent.


I'm a spurs fan and at the moment he's a flawed messiah, with potential to become a 'crook' when he fucks us off for the england job.

They may as well have also said 'Rafa may have drank a bottle of whiskey for his breakfast' - absolutely no quotes. The Telegraph might dress it up a bit but still no quotes from anyone at Anfield let alone Rafa. They could easily have finished story with, 'it is believed in some quarters that Ferguson was enraged when he may have heard Rooney had broken a toe nail and the FA may have shuffled him back to Old Trafford a.s.a.p. before being engulfed by another political storm with Ferguson'.
I guess they do it at every Club when they can smell blood - I am sure Spurs, Arsenal fans for instance also feel there is sometimes a vendetta against them as well. Best way to deal with it is like Ferguson and just ban the journalists who don't follow the party line from the news conferences or even particular newspapers which he has done in the past.

The only thing Rafa owes that chump is a drop kick :)


FA weren't interested in Warnock - wouldn't have made any headlines. If anything they only gave Rafa a slap on the wrists, besides the fact he should never have been charged, because it means they don't have to take the hardline on Ferguson and can thus avoid the fallout from all his cronies in the media.

  • 3 weeks later...

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No way. No other manager could have done what Rafa

> has with the resources he's had. We just need to

> the owners to piss off and bit of luck. I mean,

> who concedes a goal because of a beachball FFS?!

>

> Yanks out. In Rafa we trust.


Your loyalty to rafa amazes me anna. You are definately old school. How badly would he have to perform for liverpool fans not to support him.

Firstly, I notice that united fans are still as obsessed as ever. First post back after 2 weeks away and they can't even mention their own team.


MM - Rafa has one hand tied behind his back. Stop believing what SSN and the papers tell you.


We have had a ridiculous amount of bad luck with injuries this season. Gerrard, Torres probably needs a hernia op, Carra and Skrtel smashed their heads together on the first day of the season, Kelly, Agger, Riera, El Zhar, Aurelio,Dossena, Cavalieri, N'Gog, Johnson, Aquilani comes back and gets a virus.


So yeah, we should sack our manager......

Not to mention the fact he's hardly competing on a level playing field. Rafa's net spend over the past 2 seasons is ?2.5 million. ?2.5 million?! He has spent on average ?20 million a season since he has been here and has totally reshaped the team. Not bad considering our squad now contains Torres, Mascherano, Benayoun, Reina, Skrtel, Johnson to name just a few.


Our owners spent more in expenses than what they did on a single player last season. If they continue to place debt on our club, losing games at the start of the season will become the least of our worries.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • May  I  suggest you read your posts through before you post them? I'm sorry your attempts at teaching blinds to see have failed. Perhaps it is because they are inanimate objects? And have no eyes? 🤣 May I also suggest that you find a different source of information - one  which presents you with accurate facts? But if you seriously think that Trump is "best us president of last 50 years" (your lower case, not mine) then sadly there is probably little anybody can do to help you.
    • There are many reasons that properties both private and council are empty and these numbers do not signify that they could be moved into tomorrow to reduce homeless numbers. For example, in my terrace of 10 houses, one house is going through probate and another is going through a large scale renovation. 20% non ocupancy seems high until you examine the reasons why. Both will be providing homes in due course, sooner rather than later.
    • My apologies but I can't teach a blind to see yet... may I suggest,  you could try surround yourself with people who see things differently and grow in knowledge and wisdom. 
    • Good update - thanks march46. The actual % Southwark Council is currently agreeing with developers that must be social housing is generally much lower - not walking the talk. And the council currently has over 1,250 empty council properties and rising, plus over 5,000 empty private properties. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...