Jump to content

Recommended Posts

ratty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They will sadly drop off the end of the forum and

> into cyber oblivion.

>

> Not looking forward to Saturday. Seeing that smug

> crook back down at FP is going to turn many a

> stomach. Oh, and if he thinks that the SAS will

> protect him from the three digits he has another

> thunk coming! ;)

>

> My prediction? Pompey -7 Tottenham 9 sadly! :(




it's funny that HR is suddenly a 'crook' to any team's fans that he's left- despite any success he brought them, but is a messiah type figure when he's incumbent.


I'm a spurs fan and at the moment he's a flawed messiah, with potential to become a 'crook' when he fucks us off for the england job.

They may as well have also said 'Rafa may have drank a bottle of whiskey for his breakfast' - absolutely no quotes. The Telegraph might dress it up a bit but still no quotes from anyone at Anfield let alone Rafa. They could easily have finished story with, 'it is believed in some quarters that Ferguson was enraged when he may have heard Rooney had broken a toe nail and the FA may have shuffled him back to Old Trafford a.s.a.p. before being engulfed by another political storm with Ferguson'.
I guess they do it at every Club when they can smell blood - I am sure Spurs, Arsenal fans for instance also feel there is sometimes a vendetta against them as well. Best way to deal with it is like Ferguson and just ban the journalists who don't follow the party line from the news conferences or even particular newspapers which he has done in the past.

The only thing Rafa owes that chump is a drop kick :)


FA weren't interested in Warnock - wouldn't have made any headlines. If anything they only gave Rafa a slap on the wrists, besides the fact he should never have been charged, because it means they don't have to take the hardline on Ferguson and can thus avoid the fallout from all his cronies in the media.

  • 3 weeks later...

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No way. No other manager could have done what Rafa

> has with the resources he's had. We just need to

> the owners to piss off and bit of luck. I mean,

> who concedes a goal because of a beachball FFS?!

>

> Yanks out. In Rafa we trust.


Your loyalty to rafa amazes me anna. You are definately old school. How badly would he have to perform for liverpool fans not to support him.

Firstly, I notice that united fans are still as obsessed as ever. First post back after 2 weeks away and they can't even mention their own team.


MM - Rafa has one hand tied behind his back. Stop believing what SSN and the papers tell you.


We have had a ridiculous amount of bad luck with injuries this season. Gerrard, Torres probably needs a hernia op, Carra and Skrtel smashed their heads together on the first day of the season, Kelly, Agger, Riera, El Zhar, Aurelio,Dossena, Cavalieri, N'Gog, Johnson, Aquilani comes back and gets a virus.


So yeah, we should sack our manager......

Not to mention the fact he's hardly competing on a level playing field. Rafa's net spend over the past 2 seasons is ?2.5 million. ?2.5 million?! He has spent on average ?20 million a season since he has been here and has totally reshaped the team. Not bad considering our squad now contains Torres, Mascherano, Benayoun, Reina, Skrtel, Johnson to name just a few.


Our owners spent more in expenses than what they did on a single player last season. If they continue to place debt on our club, losing games at the start of the season will become the least of our worries.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Current status of Planning Application 24/AP/2314 is the approval document was published 31 December 2025 with effect 1 January 2026.  https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications/files/E5F5EC6005598720843BC00D7E6A7D11/pdf/24_AP_2314-DECISION_NOTICE_-_MAJOR_-_GRANT-4194604.pdf It has 41 conditions many of which must be confirmed via further applications into Southwark Council before works on site can begin. I've not seen any applications to start discharging those conditions yet - amazed some of these have not been prepared by the developer. No work of any kind is allowed on site until some of those conditions are discharged. Additionally the sites proximity to the rail tracks means Network Rail will have to be heavily involved. My work experiences with Network Rail would suggest quite some delay will come rom them alone.  With the national government and Southwark Council planning to reduce the proportion of social housing from 35% to 20%, and some schemes in Southwark are now only provided 2% social housing. It would be amazing if the developer doesn't seek an amended viability appraisal to reduce social housing for the scheme or even taller buildings.
    • I did the same on a bus.  The whole bus cheered!  The religious nut shut up.  It is not acceptable for people to try and force their beliefs on you
    • Hello    Any one selling a second hand coshh cabinet?    Thanks xx 
    • Hi all Any updates on this planning? I checked the last form but there is no date for commencing so if anyone knows anything it would be appreciated On Friday I saw massive blockers being placed at the gate
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...