Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Having seen the goal this morning I thought that the ref made a rod for his own back by first stopping Sunderland from taking a quick free kick, presumably because either the ball was moving or it was taken from the wrong place. When Turner then took the kick the ref wasn't even watching so he appeared to be chancing his arm. Having said that I could see nothing wrong with it. I did think Gerrard should have been sent off later though.

expat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> but there was no players bar the keeper from the

> sunderland side between him and the goal.


You cannot be offside if you are behind the ball when it is played


In regard the free kick, Turner played the ball from the spot the free kick was given. Turner and the Keeper were in noddy land whilst Torres latched onto what he thought was a dopey back pass.


As for Steve Bruce. What a &*^%! When Carragher and Skrtel clashed heads Bruce was yelling at the officials for allowing Skrtel to be treated on pitch as he wanted game to be re-started with 11 against 9.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Someone make a case for the Premiership not being

> Chelsea's Please :X. Can't see them being beaten

> enough times (if at all).



Despite the fact that they lost, and deservedly so, to Man City on Saturady I can't see beyond them for the title.


Arsenal were woeful on Saturady, well done to WBA. The Arsenal defending was non existent and Almunia was worse.


What to say about Fergusons charges? Hmmm, conceding two goals in each of their past four games doesn't have the look of champions about it. If Arsenal can't beat the likes of WBA at home and Ferguson can't get the better of Bolton, they've got no chance.


Also well done to both City and the Hammers

If only Woskincy or whatever his name is had kept his trap shut he might be given a chance ? he is currently 4th cgoice but with the 3 in front doing so badly, Wenger might have given him a shout soon (which is partly his complaint I know)


But young un?s who pipe up in the media aren?t looked on kindly by Wenger. Whether he has that luxury or not is open to debate

Fabianski in goal for The Arsenal tonight, and Mr. Wenger claims he has total belief in his abilities. Hmmmm. In the same way that I think Spurs have a genuine chance of winning the title after a 50 year wait and that Mr. Redknapp really is as good as he thinks he is.


Mr. Wenger you are genuinely deluded, get rid and get a decent keeper, two decent defenders, a decent tough tackling Midfielder a la Viera, and a decent striker. Other than that, no worries!!!

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's been as plain as day for a very long time

> that the Arse have needed a top quality goalkeeper

> apart that is from Mr Magoo.






You did not post all weekend Jah - were you away ?






to westham?

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>> You did not post all weekend Jah - were you away ?

>

>

>

>

>

>

> to westham?



Was that really necessary?;-)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
    • I perceive the problem.simply as spending too much without first shoring up the economy.  If the government had reduced borrowing,  and as much as most hate the idea, reduced government deiartment spending (so called austerity) and not bowed to union pressures for pay rises, then encouraged businesses to grow, extra cash would have entered the coffers and at a later stage when the economy was in a stronger position rises in NI or taxes would have a lesser impact, but instead Reeves turned that on its head by increasing ni which has killed growth, increased prices and shimmied the economy.  What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...