Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Having seen the goal this morning I thought that the ref made a rod for his own back by first stopping Sunderland from taking a quick free kick, presumably because either the ball was moving or it was taken from the wrong place. When Turner then took the kick the ref wasn't even watching so he appeared to be chancing his arm. Having said that I could see nothing wrong with it. I did think Gerrard should have been sent off later though.

expat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> but there was no players bar the keeper from the

> sunderland side between him and the goal.


You cannot be offside if you are behind the ball when it is played


In regard the free kick, Turner played the ball from the spot the free kick was given. Turner and the Keeper were in noddy land whilst Torres latched onto what he thought was a dopey back pass.


As for Steve Bruce. What a &*^%! When Carragher and Skrtel clashed heads Bruce was yelling at the officials for allowing Skrtel to be treated on pitch as he wanted game to be re-started with 11 against 9.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Someone make a case for the Premiership not being

> Chelsea's Please :X. Can't see them being beaten

> enough times (if at all).



Despite the fact that they lost, and deservedly so, to Man City on Saturady I can't see beyond them for the title.


Arsenal were woeful on Saturady, well done to WBA. The Arsenal defending was non existent and Almunia was worse.


What to say about Fergusons charges? Hmmm, conceding two goals in each of their past four games doesn't have the look of champions about it. If Arsenal can't beat the likes of WBA at home and Ferguson can't get the better of Bolton, they've got no chance.


Also well done to both City and the Hammers

If only Woskincy or whatever his name is had kept his trap shut he might be given a chance ? he is currently 4th cgoice but with the 3 in front doing so badly, Wenger might have given him a shout soon (which is partly his complaint I know)


But young un?s who pipe up in the media aren?t looked on kindly by Wenger. Whether he has that luxury or not is open to debate

Fabianski in goal for The Arsenal tonight, and Mr. Wenger claims he has total belief in his abilities. Hmmmm. In the same way that I think Spurs have a genuine chance of winning the title after a 50 year wait and that Mr. Redknapp really is as good as he thinks he is.


Mr. Wenger you are genuinely deluded, get rid and get a decent keeper, two decent defenders, a decent tough tackling Midfielder a la Viera, and a decent striker. Other than that, no worries!!!

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's been as plain as day for a very long time

> that the Arse have needed a top quality goalkeeper

> apart that is from Mr Magoo.






You did not post all weekend Jah - were you away ?






to westham?

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>> You did not post all weekend Jah - were you away ?

>

>

>

>

>

>

> to westham?



Was that really necessary?;-)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • "attack on the tax", I posted a link, how was that an attack? I didn't write the article, so how was that an attack on the proposed tax?  Are you now saying what can and cannot be posted, when did you become Admin(NOT). 
    • Your post was an attack on the tax   I didn’t  address or mention you in my reply. Just pointed  out the problems with the article you then told be I wasn’t invited.  In no way am I bullying anyone. The reverse is true if anything 
    • The problem is, I'm not sure what the going rate is for park land for festivals of this nature. I'm sure they are paying less than outfits pay for access to the big stadia - but these have better facilities and are normally better for public transport. I am also sure that Councils could press for more, and should do so, but of course there isn't really a shortage of council lands to exploit, so these entrepreneurs could go elsewhere. What I would like to know is how much of the suggested £440,000 this year for Southwark is net profit - what are their costs in getting and administering this let? If this is a gross figure then what do they actually have as 'surplus'? But at least we have a starting point now - even if it's a guess I'm thinking it's a reasonably informed one.
    • Looks like owner of Persepolis is opening something late summer in what was The dulwich Beer Dispensary spot…  Excited about that  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...