Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I saw 'Doubt' starring Meryl Streep and Philip Seymour Hoffman. Streep was excellent but I think she carried her performance from The devil wears Prada. Hoffman played a convincing Nonce. I wasn't expecting it to end like it did though.


Saw Death defying acts with Guy Pearce and Catherine Zeta-Jones and it was gash.

Sean, can you clarify; this week or last week?


Not seen either of those but could go down on the Lovefilm list in the CitED household.

I had the misfortune of seeing "No Country for Old Men" at the weekend. Well made, brilliantly acted, some fabulous photography and as morose as buggary - but oh how unrealistically distressing. There were more murdered people than living ones. Left me with a distinctly unpleasant taste in my mouth.

Right I know they're not films but I have to give these two BBC series a bump.


1) Edge of darkness


A master piece from Troy Kennedy Martin, creator of the Italian job. This political thriller delves deep into murky areas the establishment/government would prefer to be left alone. It's set in the mid 80's and follows a Yorkshire police officer Ronald Craven (Bob Peck) who is hunting the killer of his daughter (Joanne Whalley) and along the path of his investigation gets involved in Nuclear politics and various other agencies out to get him.

Bob Peck's grieving performance blew me away. When I was younger my father tried to get me to watch this as I was doing my A-level history coursework but I wasn't interested in it. I wish I had. It came up in conversation a while back and I agreed to watch the box set and I was transfixed and watched the whole 6 hour series back to back. I thoroughly recommend this to anyone interested in the cold war or thrillers in general.


Apparently there's an American remake scheduled for realease next year and I'm not happy about this. Ray Winstone has treacherously accepted a role and should be knifed like a fish!


2) Bleak House


This Dickens adaptation was on a few years back and includes an all star cast. Gillian Anderson and Charles Dance stole the show and Johnny Vegas was a surprising compliment to the series. Gillian Anderson's Lady Deadlock was a sublime piece of acting that carried poise and surpressed guilt that was a stark contrast to Carles Dance's Mr Tulkinghorn who was 100% ice cold manipulator of peoples secrets.


I have the entire DVD box set of Bleak House and will lend it to anyone who can make me a reasonable offer, Spliff or a six pack will do.

Saw Terminator Salvation on Saturday. I'm a great fan of the first three movies in this franchise along with the made-for-TV spin-off The Sarah Conner Chronicles. Sadly, this film is not in the same league. It was a big disappointment given the potential inherent in the back-story.


The plot was weak and muddled with virtually no humanity or humour. Nor any acting dynamic between John Conner (Christian Bale) and Marcus Wright (Sam Worthington as the cyborg): they hardly ever appeared together on screen and when they did, they mostly just screamed at each other. The special effects were contemporary-standard CGI.


I read that Bale had hijacked the original screenplay requiring an on the fly rewrite during filming that raised his supporting role to rival that of the lead character - the cyborg. A friend described it as 'Dumb action with lots of explosions [and] disappointingly little nudity'. In my view, it was a clusterfcuk.

The Bucket List. Morgan Freeman and Jack Nicholson. Very sh1te. Sentimental crapolla. Probs good if you have a terminal illness.


Can't believe it has an higher IMDB rating that Starship Troopers, which is an awesome film. Apparently it is supposed to be satirising American Imperialism but the just thought it KICKED ASS MAN.


Anyone else love Starship Troopers?

Starship Troopers is indeed a classic. At somehow raised above daft nonsense by having tongue firmly in cheek. Could never understand why they'd send huge starships across the universe to battle bugs with ancient popguns. Why didn't they just start battles with big explodey things? But some films just rise above holes in plots!!

bigbadwolf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I saw The Reader with Kate Winslet and she

> certainly deserved her Oscar for it. Oh and just

> in case you were wondering lads...yes...she 'gets

> em out' but sadly they're not as firm as they were

> in Titanic.


---------------------------------------------------------------



Which is nice........

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
    • I'd quit this thread, let those who just want to slag Labour off have their own thread.  Your views on the economy are worth debating.  I'm just stunned how there wasn't this level of noise with the last government.  I could try to get some dirt on Badenoch but she is pointless  Whilst I am not a fan of the Daily Mirror at least there is some respite from Labour bashing. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/grenfell-hillsborough-families-make-powerful-36175862 https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/nigel-farage-facing-parliamentary-investigation-36188612  
    • That is a bit cake and eat it tho, isn’t it?    At what point do we stop respecting other people’s opinions and beliefs  because history shows us we sometimes simply have no other choice  you are holding some comfort blanket that allows you to believe we are all equal and all valid and we can simply voice different options - without that ever  impacting on the real world  Were the racists we fought in previous generations different? Were their beliefs patronised by the elites of the time? Or do we learn lessons and avoid mistakes of the past?   racists/bigots having “just as much to say” is both true and yet, a thing we have learnt from the past. The lesson was not “ooh let’s hear them out. They sound interesting and valid and as worthy of an audience as people who hold the opposite opinion” 
    • I don't have a beef with you. But I do have a beef with people who feel that a certain portion of the public's opinion isn't valid.  I don't like racism any more than anyone else here. But I do dislike the idea that an individual's thoughts, beliefs and feelings, no matter how much I may disagree with them, are somehow worth less than my own.  And I get the sense that that is what many disenfranchised voters are feeling - that they are being looked down upon as ignorant, racists who have no right to be in the conversation. And that's what brings out people on the margins and drives them towards extremes, like Reform.  Whether you like it or not, the racist, bigot, anti-european nextdoor to you has just as much say in the country as you do. Intellectual superiority is never going to bring them round. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...