Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"Perhaps because it's not true?"


Of course I should have specified, particularly for the benefit of the overly literal, that I did mean post-Dr Beeching, but I'm glad you were around then and such an obvious train nerd as to be able to recall such fine detail. Were they steam, and did you copy that from your trainspotting book?


I didn't mean to suggest that ED station had never had a Sunday train service, but I do realise that it was possible for pendants to read it that way. However, it certainly was true immediately prior to the period under discussion, unless you're suggesting that the regeneration of ED started in the 1950s.


So, for the benefit of the dysfunctionally precise, ED station did not have a Sunday train service when I moved to ED in the mid-1980s, or for a number or years after that, which included the earlier part of the period under discussion here. Other off-peak weekday services were also poor at that time. As, actually, were peak-time services, which is why I stopped using the train in 1991 to commute to Camden.


ED station had no public address system (I was told that investment in this kind of technology had been stopped as as result of the other investment required following the determined outcome of the Clapham rail disaster and because of planned denationalisation. There were no boards showing updated arrival/departure times. If London Bridge or outward-bound trains were cancelled the ticket office staff had to walk up the ramp to the outward-bound platform and shout information to waiting passengers. If London bound passengers dared to go down to the ticket office to enquire themselves, if no-one had appeared, they risked missing a train if it appeared when they were doing that. Otherwise, it was a brilliant service.


Jeez, some people.

To some extent the regeneration began in the mid 1980s. In 1986, East Dulwich was beginning to get swept up in the property boom that followed 'Big Bang' in the City, and it was being 'discovered' by yuppies. My recollection is the same as Frisco's, that in the mid 80s you couldn't get a train to East Dulwich after about 9.30pm weekdays, and nothing on Sundays. So late evening trains, whenever they came, made the area seem more accessible.


There were lots of skips in my road in 1987, The Observer did a piece about great old flats you could buy on Goose Green, and house prices more than doubled in three years. There was a good restaurant called Le Careme, all the Indian restaurants, plus the Time Out recommended Thai Pavilion on Melbourne Grove. Then things came to an abrupt halt in 1988, and there were a few years of stagnation (some house prices dropped by at least 25% from their peak).


I agree with those who say Sainsbury's arrival was a key moment. When was that, 1992 ish? There were two big worries at the time, that it would generate horrific traffic jams throughout the area (didn't happen) and that it would kill off shops on LL (to some extent did happen - the last butchers, greengrocers etc all gradually disappeared). I'm sure that being a place with a Sainsbury's put East Dulwich on the map for many people.


Of the other 'turning points', one that stood out for me was when East Dulwich Tavern, by reputation the roughest pub on Lordship Lane, got done up as the EDT. That started the game of pub leapfrog, where the next roughest pub on the list got done up to become the new smart venue. The Plough was the last.

It would be somewhat drastic to chew one's own foot off rather than live in Wanstead, unless one was heavily into self-mutilation. Have you been to Wanstead recently? I grew up near there and was pleasantly surprised to see how it had come on. Delightful High Street with shops on one side and largely open on the other side. Lots of pavement cafes and Epping Forest nearby. Numerous dodgy geezas around, several attending Snaresbrook Crown Court, but then there are loads of Sarf London villains in the vicinity of ED.

"Have you been to Wanstead recently? I grew up near there and was pleasantly surprised to see how it had come on. Delightful High Street with shops on one side and largely open on the other side. Lots of pavement cafes and Epping Forest nearby. Numerous dodgy geezas around, several attending Snaresbrook Crown Court, but then there are loads of Sarf London villains in the vicinity of ED."


Yes I have been there recently, I was treated to lunch in one of the eateries you describe by a satisfied customer, and I do know it quite well anyway. I've never been as quite as aware of the Sarf London vilains in ED as I am of the Essex influence and brashness I've encountered in Wanstead. Anyway, it's down to personal preference. I can't stand the place and wouldn't live there for a big clock. It does have one thing that ED doesn't have though, the M11 link road running through the middle of it. ED is missing out on that.

I've been to Wanstead a couple of times - lived near Ilford for 4 years and more recently had a friend who lived there


By day it's reasonably "nice" and that but - and I don't want to just characterise it as an Essex thing, that would be stereotyping - but if people find LL lairy on a Sat night then they have seen nothing. The bars in the evening are like one big stag/hen do


Oh - AND the bars I've been do have loo attendants - the ones with aftershave and a pound coin tip jar. In Wanstead????!!!

And Wanstead does have the Underground going straight to the City and West End (from both Wanstead and Snaresbrook Stations), which ED doesn't, and won't, have. I seem to remember that at one time it was planned that the E London Line would go through ED, but this was later changed to Denmark Hill.

"I seem to remember that at one time it was planned that the E London Line would go through ED, but this was later changed to Denmark Hill."


In an early plan, the East London Line extension was to terminate at ED, with a siding on the land attached to the builders' merchant next to the station. I don't mind at all not having the Central or Jubilee Lines here.

"can't remember when they restarted."


If I had to guess, I'd say about 1995, although it could have been one or two years either side of that. It didn't register because I'd been put off train travel by then in the immediate pre-privatisation chaos and disrepair.

Frisco Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've never been as quite as aware of the Sarf London vilains in ED as I am of the Essex influence and brashness I've encountered in Wanstead.


Except in stab&wine, 3am Sunday mornings ;-)

I thought the East London Line extension was going to carry on through ED to Wimbledon when it was originally planned. Also thought it still could happen in the future if they can get the funding.. For me the proper regeneration of the area started with Nico Ladenis in the very late '70's or early '80's. He showed that there was an appetite (no pun intended) for an upmarket restaurant in, what was, a fairly downmarket area. I think after he went other people saw the potential and started to move in.

"I thought the East London Line extension was going to carry on through ED to Wimbledon when it was originally planned."


No, the original (quite limited) plan was for the East London Line to terminate at ED. There were printed plans showing this, and they were issued at a public meeting about transport improvement options for Southwark in the mid-1990s. This was around the first time that the tramlink from Euston to Peckham was conceived, and there was a meeting held in Camberwell (I believe somewhere near St Giles Church, although I can't recall exactly where). However, I do recall giving the councillor who was chair of regeneration at the time a lift home to his home in Playfield Cresent, via Springers wine bar (I knew him you see).


The proposed extension to Wimbledon came later, as did Ken's plan to take the line to Clapham Junction via Denmark Hill. ED lost out quite early in the development plans, but it did feature quite significantly at the beginning. So, no ELL station at ED, and no extension to the tramlink either, but still Peckham feels it's neglected.


"Also thought it still could happen in the future if they can get the funding."


I don't disagree, and I don't think I suggested it couldn't.


"For me the proper regeneration of the area started with Nico Ladenis in the very late '70's or early '80's."


I thought you were going to say it started with the laying of the tramlines on Dog Kennel Hill. ;-P


"He showed that there was an appetite (no pun intended) for an upmarket restaurant in, what was, a fairly downmarket area. I think after he went other people saw the potential and started to move in."


I think he was just following a trend at that time to open very popular restaurants in non-exclusive areas (even downmarket at the time), such as Clapham, Battersea, Victoria, Notting Hill, Maida Vale, etc. etc. Some areas worked, while others didn't work for sometime, if at all. However, not everyone managed the fast-track to Mayfair.

it's people moving across from brixton and surrounding areas who wanted to bring up their kids in a victorian house in a nice neighbourhood (nowt wrong with that.) so i go with demographics, the shops and estate agents just follow.


the irony is that ED is now far more expensive than brixton.

"Plans cancelled in 1902."


So, what has that, an 'original' Victorian* plan that never happened (not even any tracks laid), got to do with the recent (over the last 20 year period) regeneration of ED and its shopping centre? I sensed you'd were determined to go back as far as the coming of the trams to ED. Which shops that opened on LL in 1902 are you going to suggest started ED's regeneration? How did the opening and closure of LL Station affect it? Clearly, we need to know for the situation on 2007 to make sense.


"Happy to educate."


And I'm happy to be educated, but in the right context and by genuine educators, who wouldn't to do so in such an obviously anal, irrelevant, nerdish and point-scoring way.



*Yes, I know it was cancelled during Edward VII's reign.

"I reckon Frisco and macroban are in fact the same (slightly odd) person."


Nothing odder than being called Cuthbert Dibble, is there? No, not the same person, I don't believe I have OCD.


Btw, have you contributed to theories and discussions about the regeneration of ED, or very much else come to that?

Frisco's correct re the earlier East London Line plans:


Hansard: 27 March 1990 (Column 222)


Secretary of State for Transport (Cecil Parkinson): "LRT (London Regional Transport as was) is appraising the extensions of the Docklands light railway to Lewisham and of the east London line northwards to Dalston and Highbury and southward to east (sic) Dulwich."


Raised as an option in 1989 and dropped soon after the extract above - later on in 1990 I believe. I imagine Estate Agents still managed to seal a few sales on the back of the plans though - even in that narrow window of opportunity.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...