Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Huguenot


The only way they could meet that commitment was to spend from the piggy bank.


There is rarely anything more offensive than geriatrics who have benefitted from running up a credit card that their children will have to pay off, until they get self righteous about it.


Your generation asset stripped the nation leaving a debt time bomb that your grandchildren will have to pay off through poverty. You spent everything you earned in 70 years, and then your generation spent everything that was going to be earned by your children in the next 70 years.


The 20th century generation will be famous in history for one thing - their greed.


And that, mate, means you.


Exactly right MATE.


The only way they could meet that commitment was to spend from the piggy bank.


The commitments being, bigger pensions and wages for MPs and civil servants.


My generation, I take offence to my generation being called geriatrics.


I think you need a permantly toilet roll around your neck, for the amount of crap that?s coming out of it, and if you want to take offence to that, Great get on with it.


It?s not the people that are to blame, for the mismanagement of this Country over the years, its people like you that go along with the crap that Governments and Councils give out. The Governments have been asset stripping for years to cover up their costly mistakes. That?s why the Country is in a mess, people like you, who put the blame on the people, and not the Governments, where it belongs.

fredricketts - the people put the governments in. So if we get crap government - it's our fault.


To my lasting pride I campaigned against Tony Blair's government before 1997, didn't share the joy of hos "New Britain", loathed him from the first and am pleased that my views seem to be shared by the majority. However, he's an example of how slick dicks can con the British public.

Huguenot, calling older people "geriatrics" is as offensive as calling black people by the "N" word, and I deeply resent it.


I get my retirement pension in a year's time, but the UK pension is very low compared to similar nations such as France and Germany, so I won't be exactly flush with money.


If you want to attack any group of people, then blame the people who have asset stripped the economy in the last thirty years - the bankers and the like. They are the people who have left this country in its present state, not a few over 60s who claim the Freedom Pass, which would not be needed if the retirement pension was at all adequate.

Marmora Man


fredricketts - the people put the governments in. So if we get crap government - it's our fault.


To my lasting pride I campaigned against Tony Blair's government before 1997, didn't share the joy of hos "New Britain", loathed him from the first and am pleased that my views seem to be shared by the majority. However, he's an example of how slick dicks can con the British public.


Could not agree with you more.


Tony Blair is a typical MP and Priminster who tell blatant lies, and we are all conned into believing them, it?s the same with all of them, promise everything to get in, when in, do what they please for five years, except when it comes near to voting again, they change their rhetoric, and con us all again.

The bankers have asset stripped the economy in the last thirty years have they? I'd be interested to learn more about this, please enlighten me.


Zebedee Tring Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Huguenot, calling older people "geriatrics" is as

> offensive as calling black people by the "N" word,

> and I deeply resent it.

>

> I get my retirement pension in a year's time, but

> the UK pension is very low compared to similar

> nations such as France and Germany, so I won't be

> exactly flush with money.

>

> If you want to attack any group of people, then

> blame the people who have asset stripped the

> economy in the last thirty years - the bankers and

> the like. They are the people who have left this

> country in its present state, not a few over 60s

> who claim the Freedom Pass, which would not be

> needed if the retirement pension was at all

> adequate.

My reference to "bankers and the like" (not just bankers) was in response to Huguenot's insulting reference to "geriatrics" when he really meant "retired people" and his attempt to blame so-called "geriatrics" for the state of the country.


I agree that the thread should have been about the M&S proposal and intended to say so in my post responding to Huguenot, but unfortunately didn't.

"Geriatric" may be insulting you, but that is your problem. It is NOT an age-ist equivalent of the N word.


Geriatics are not nescessarily retired nor are retired people nescessarily Geriatric.


Geriatric is a term used extensively in medicine, care, Government and any number of other fields without any negative inference.


Huguenot would defend himself, but he is having his afternoon nap.

MP, it is NOT my problem.


Huguenot said "There is rarely anything more offensive than geriatrics who have benefitted from running up a credit card that their children will have to pay off, until they get self righteous about it."


It's pretty clear that his use of the word "geriatric" was, and was meant to be, offensive. And I'm not the only poster that found it offensive.


Can we please get back to discussing M&S and that celebrated workers co-operative Iceland.

Zebedee Tring Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lowlander Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Who else found geriatric offensive then?

>

> Fred Rickettes did, for one.

>

> But please let's get back to discussing M&S and

> Iceland.


Surely after 35 pages of discussion on M&S and Iceland there can't be much more to discuss....that is until the planning application goes back in and we can start again at page 1 with a debate over the merits of a ?3.50 prawn sandwich or a 99p bag of sausage rolls!


PS....and no, I haven't checked the prices are accurate as at this second!

Actually it can be offensive, see below.


Adds hastily, but despite being in the relevant age group I wasn't personally offended. (But I'll defend the right of anybody else to be offended :)) )



geriatric [ˌdʒɛrɪˈ?trɪk]

adj

1. (Medicine) of or relating to geriatrics or to elderly people

2. Facetious, derogatory, or offensive (of people or machines) old, obsolescent, worn out, or useless

n

1. (Medicine) an elderly person

2. Derogatory an older person considered as one who may be disregarded as senile or irresponsible See also psychogeriatric

[from Greek gēras old age + iatric]



And yes, surely there can be little more left to say about the Iceland / M&S thing, unless there is more actual news about what is happening to the building .....

Nothing wrong with the French it?s M&S who have problems they opened a store in Paris it's full of ?clothing? (The French REALLY need M&S clothes) no M&S food except for a couple of gift biscuit tins so if you want baked beans or bacon or some M&S sandwich or a loaf of sliced english bread forget it!

M&S Clue&Less .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • where I've got to with left politics is very much not defined by labels - when anyone suggests (for example and without judgement) "a reformist socialist government" - my response now is: "like where? Which country is closest to this ideal and what challenges to they face?"
    • I wonder why they didn’t use Fairfield Halls with 10 times the space
    • Was anyone commenting here actually AT the meeting?  I was.  Yes David Peckham; it WAS busy. I'd estimate about 150 people filling the biggest room at Ruskin House, with some standing at the back.  And the bar was quite separate with no queue and sensible prices the twice I used it.  To Insuflo I'd say that my reading of Zarah Sultana's piece in The New Left Review accurately admitted past (Corbyn) mistakes and sought to lay a better path for the future. Jeremy is respected by millions but has not been as shrewd or tough an operator as I hope she turns out to be. Precisely the progressive point she makes despite the fact some will try to cite it as a split.  I agree The Left has been guilty of in-fighting at the cost of political success in the past, particularly given FPTP, but some of us are incurable idealists who don't just give up and snipe from the sidelines. I remember a meeting at Brixton Town Hall in the 80s where a Labour Party member advised someone from one or other of the fringe Left parties to 'get out of your ideological telephone booth'. Very funny and accurate and I never forgot the expression.  Maybe The Labour Party is the expression of liberal-thinkers who suppress their disagreements in the interest of occasionally forming a UK government, but their current incarnation is giving dangerous concessions to violent Zionists and UK fascists. Some of us have not given up hope and seek to learn from the mistakes of the past with respect to the formation of a new Left party.  The speakers listed on the poster were, I thought, intelligent and eloquent. One was determined, for instance, actually to organise people to confront the racists attacking asylum seekers in Epping and elsewhere. Another informed us about TfL seeking to change the rules to allow the expulsion of about 70 tube staff from the UK for visa-renewal reasons and that she and others are taking action to prevent that happening. Practical interventions in the real world when The Right is on the rise, emboldened by Reform and its desperate manifesto.  Another emphasised the crucial importance of ecological awareness in policy-making, although alliances with the Green Party were a matter of debate.  A youthful presence (the majority present were, like me, grey-haired) was the contributions by members of the latest incarnation of the 'Revolutionary Communist Party'. One by one they did what that party does: stand up and say 'yes we support the apparent aims of 'Your Party' but really the only solution is revolution' (they mean Bolshevik/French style).  This met with little applause, I think because most people present know that that is not going to happen here unless things get an awful lot worse. Realistically a reformist Socialist government is the furthest Left the current British population could ever countenance in my opinion.  So yes; if we let in-fighting be caused by groups who really just wish to push their manifestos at leftie forums we won't even be in a position to 'split The Left' in the way Sephiroth suggests.  I have been a union member for 22 years, helped organise a unique strike of Lambeth College Unison workers in 2016, voted twice for Jeremy Corbyn as Labour Party leader, and canvassed for him in 2024 in Islington North. Yes; mostly I've lived under Tory governments and seen the welfare state eroded, but I will always resist cynicism and defeatism.  Last night's meeting reminded me that there are decent people out there willing to try to improve society, rather than accept this Labour government as 'the best we can do'.  Peace and love.   
    • a - you said you were done interacting with me, remember b - " police, judge, jury, prosecution and executioner"  - the not very bright person's response on any public forum when someone point out the idiocy of anything. I haven't prosecuted anyone, executed anyone, or taken part in any trial or jury.    I have judged tho but then so do you and so did the OP - so what? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...