Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Love some, Quids, but the missus is hoofing a hole in my shin under your Habitat oak veneer extender so I'd better say no. Plus, I'm on the early shift tomorrow taking the twins to their circus skills class.


Also, I plan on killing myself tomorrow so it'd only be a waste of your Cockburn.

bsand Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Police Crime Map April 2012

>

> Nunhead - all crime 874

> East Dulwich - all crime 446

>

> http://www.police.uk/crime/?q=London,%20Greater%20

> London%20SE22,%20UK#crimetypes/2012-04

>

> There's a reason why Nunhead is cheaper and that's

> it - you see a lot of bars and security gates

> there as well.


Don't those figures simply reflect denser housing and therefore higher population? If you set the map to Knightsbridge (SW1X), the crime figure goes up to 1763 - more than twice the figure for Nunhead. The crime figure is higher in Knightsbridge simply because there are more people there, not because it's a rougher neighbourhood.

So i googled met police crime rates for both nunhead and east dulwich and there were some interesting facts...

East dulwich

http://maps.met.police.uk/access.php?pcode=Se22+8el&searchlocation-button=&sort=rate&curr_area=E01004016

Nunhead

http://maps.met.police.uk/access.php?area=00BEGP&ct=16&sort=rate


Anyway, my point is that nunhead is also a decent and safe place to live as is east dulwich. Neither have the omnipresent threat of crime and you can walk the streets at night without any trouble. You may get more for your money if you explore a little further away but still have access to all things ed.

Gimme Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> When we were house hunting in 2007 there were

> plenty of 3 beds in the 600k bracket so in reality

> it sounds like prices are back to 2007 levels.


I'd say ED property is now in excess of 2007 levels.

Interest rates are at a 300 year low for a reason, our economy and banks are f'd. Any rise in rates risks more defaults and more banks going under... Hence they'll doubtful be any rise in rates and hence no bubble burst.


Over the next 5 years rates will have to rise slowly as economies become stronger again with a gentle fall in housing prices.it's a fact that house prices, even in London, have to eventuallly reflect average earnings, so they just have to fall, but not overnight.


It's tough if your in the market to buy as there seems to be a demand gap between one bed flats and houses, so it's the 2nd rung on the ladder that's a real issue.

aicardo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> it's a fact that

> house prices, even in London, have to eventuallly

> reflect average earnings, so they just have to

> fall, but not overnight.


I don't think this is by any means a fact. The population of London continues to grow. The amount of new housing built doesn't keep up with that. Add to that the fact that many buyers are after period conversions, which are of course of limited supply. London just doesn't follow the same rules that most of the rest of the country does - I don't think prices have to fall at all. They may steady off, or just rise in a slower manner but I can't see them crashing tbh.

AlexC Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> aicardo Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> Add to that the fact that many buyers are after

> period conversions, which are of course of limited

> supply.


No, demand for flats is much less strong than demand for houses outside the centre.

Most of the growth in prices has been in larger houses or prime central locations. A period conversation in SE22 isn't a safe bet.

benmorg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> AlexC Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > aicardo Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > Add to that the fact that many buyers are after

> > period conversions, which are of course of

> limited

> > supply.

>

> No, demand for flats is much less strong than

> demand for houses outside the centre.

> Most of the growth in prices has been in larger

> houses or prime central locations. A period

> conversation in SE22 isn't a safe bet.


I don't really think that there are any safe bets, so I'd agree with you there, but I just don't see a property price crash happening in London. Price stagnation, maybe. I see the odd property getting reduced in price but looking at the ads it usually seems more of a case of the seller thinking prices are still rising a la pre-recession levels.

Interesting.


I think we have to realise that, just as london is a totally different market cf outside london, different parts of london behave differently. Prime central is clearly being supported by foreign panickers using it and sterling like a Swiss bank account. As I have said many times before, the Brits in these areas sell and move to the new prime - places like Fulham, Wworth and Clapham. We are currently getting the spill over from Clapham.


Se london with access to the new overgound is in a rather different position again because suddenly city money can live here and get to work really fast. Both the wharf and city are covered by the 'ginger' line as my friend calls it. If your place is near an o/g station, then I think you are in business. The rest of the area as it approaches sw6 prices (!!) I am less sure about.


At some point the ' panickers' will gain confidence and buy again in Paris, rome, athens or whereever

AlexC, I agree that often prices take a long time to fall in areas where people can cover their mortgage. At some point though, some people have to sell, through the usual divorce, death or new family. Then you suddenly see the drop.


Also, prices stagnating equals dropping in real terms. It is amazing how horribly inflation can eat into savings and real capital values of properties.


Then to pick up again, you need UK growth.


Having said all this, I love property and am constantly looking and thinking about buying. We just never have the guts at these eye watering levels, that's all.

What makes no sense is the price differentials.

A fully refurbished flat with new heating wiring new kitchen and bathroom is little more to buy than a rundown pile of cack which would need a 50K refit I spent 14k on my bathroom alone!

Not like that in Paris a pile of cack is often ?200 a sqft cheaper.

The London market is still stuck in the victorian era in pricing too.

I think it's Lazy Estate Agents mind you they aren't the brightest probably can't figure out how to calculate price pere sqft.. hehehehehe derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

My wife and me recently got gazumped on our third house in ED. Why do estate agents allow this sort of practice to happen so often? It is just so unfair and cruel. We have had enough and are looking elsewhere. We've found somewhere lovely in Penge. It's cheaper but bigger and has a great vibe.

I've just been gazumped too.

But it's not bad agents.

Working for the seller the agents have to put forward any offers which they get even after the seller has agreed to accept an offer so it's the greedy seller not the agents who are the shysters.

Even if you get gazumped you can still gazump back.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...