Jump to content

The Begging Bowl


kels

Recommended Posts

Despite the mixed reviews I was still up for trying this place, not after seeing their tweet "A disgruntled customer who didn't like queuing for a table, sent a letter on Morgan stanley headed paper.Definitely don't come back please !". Shows how poor their customer service is if this is the way they react to someone giving them some feedback.

boswell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Despite the mixed reviews I was still up for

> trying this place, not after seeing their tweet "A

> disgruntled customer who didn't like queuing for a

> table, sent a letter on Morgan stanley headed

> paper.Definitely don't come back please !". Shows

> how poor their customer service is if this is the

> way they react to someone giving them some

> feedback.


Really?! Appallingly stupid, churlish & unprofessional. Allowing for teething problems, we too were going to try it. Tonight in fact for an early dinner to avoid the lines despite our next door neighbours also complaining about the costs of their small portions - especially of veg - (though tasty apparently) and the hour plus wait debacles to and fro the pub over the road (which could be quickly resolved with vibrating pagers or succumbing to a booking system). But not now. Wonder if the BB is heading the same way as those other establishments that we dare not mention.

I think BB might be wise to extend the olive branch. I'm still a bit mystified though.. I was there on Friday and the staff were really helpful and friendly.. Also sending a personal complaint on some blue chip company letterheaded paper is a bit silly.. Smacks of self-aggrandisment.

jimbo1964 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> sending a personal complaint

> on some blue chip company letterheaded paper is a

> bit silly.. Smacks of self-aggrandisment.


I guess it could be seen that way.


As with other similar threads in the past, it is my guess that we don't quite know the whole story, so we shouldn't paint the BB as the villain. Nevertheless... still not smart to discuss it on twitter.

jimbo1964 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>.. Also sending a personal complaint

> on some blue chip company letterheaded paper is a

> bit silly.. Smacks of self-aggrandisment.


I completely agree with you Jimbo. What exactly are they trying to prove by doing that except that they have money and therefore what, that they shouldn't have been treated that way?! That the company have lost out somehow because they have a lot of money? Be pissed off that you feel you weren't treated well but your wealth, social status or job really doesn't matter when it comes to customer services- all customers deserve the same high level of customer service, so that really wasn't necessary and was really quite silly of them.


Don't get me wrong though, I think it's really quite crap the way BB have handled the situation,and pretty unprofessional to tweet about it. They should definitely have responded to the letter and apologised and offered an olive branch. However, I would question the attitude of the customer and therefore wonder if there is more to this story so I definitely wouldn't personally write ofF BB based on this incident alone.


One thing I was quite disappointed about when looking at the menu was the idea that all the dishes were meant for 2. I like dining alone sometimes so that has kind of put me trying it as the whole concept seems to be around sharing. However, if the portions are small maybe I'll still give it a go- though I don't think I'll be paying ?7.50 for a plate of broccoli just for myself, as lovely as I'm sure it is!

Just reading a few of the posts above and has anyone thought to ... Um... You know actually SPEAK to the staff and request a child friendly meal? Or that you would be dining alone so would they be considerate enough to just charge per person?

That's the problem with social media - people are forgetting how to speak to each other!

I did ask standswithfist. I'm not on twitter, I don't know if they're on facebook, and their website isn't up and running so lo and behold I went to the restaurant to have a look and talk to them! so yes, some of us still talk to others!


Not all restaurants can constantly make adjustments for each and every customer and I understand that and certainly don't expect them to. I wasn't moaning about their concept, I was just saying it may not suit me but that's ok because I don't expect it to! And if you take a kid to a Thai restaurant, expect the kid to eat Thai food- and Thai food is way more than pad thai so I say good on them for having a bit more imagination.

Went tonight. Seated quickly outside, on what may be the last opportunity for al fresco grub this year, the staff were really lovely, attentive and helpful. The food was delicious. Be warned that some of it was VERY hot! The squid, broccoli and fish cakes were fantastic. Service was great but slow. There were 4 of us, having a leisurely catch up, so speed wasn't important. Maybe if there were 2 of us we'd have been a bit frustrated by how long it all took. Mostly delicious but the duck curry was too hot for all of us and the beef salad was tasty but the beef too tough. On the whole the food was hit and miss but mostly hit. Lovely cocktails too. I'd recommend the lemongrass martinis!


Will definitely go again.

sidll Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In my day, a long time ago, using the firm's

> writing paper for unauthorised purposes lost you

> your job. I would find out from this one off

> poster whether he is writing on behalf of Morgan

> Stanley.


Why, what's it to you? I don't see that has any relevance to the treatment they had at the Begging Bowl.

antantant Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They just tweeted that the Evening Standard are

> coming to review tomorrow...



Aren't those reviews supposed to be anonymous? Otherwise it gives an unfair advantage. They sound like idiots to be even tweeting that; they can hardly then say that the review was impartial when it comes out.

Does anyone else find the name Begging Bowl peculiar? When I first heard it, I thought of people living on the street begging. I now think of it to mean they are asking customers to come in and beg to be treated like crap by making them wait for hours in line instead of allowing some reservations and some walk-ins. It also makes me think of customers holding up bowls begging to be served a bowl of broccoli for ?7.


I follow Vincent Ayre's of Ayre's Bakery twitter account and he has stated many times that he would never go to a restaurant that made him queue. It was on his Twitter account that I found the Begging Bowl's tweet about the customer complaint letter.

I went in a group of 5 to the begging bowl - all in the food industry and as a group this is what we thought.


We met at The Victoria and my partner ran accross to ask for a table and within 10 minutes we had a call on our mobile to say you had one. Big thumbs up as we had the outside table. We could see you guys were busy and we would of been happy to wait up to an hour and we all agreed that first come first serve without bookings is cool. We all love street food so queuing isn't a problem for us at all.


Loved the restaurant, the decor, the atmosphere, the glasses, the crockery, the table layout, the lighting. We all agreed when we sat down that we felt we were on our jollys going out for dinner! It was a warm evening so that helped ;o)


Staff were amazing. Described the menu with passion and experience in tasting the dishes came across. Friendly, fun and attentive.


We didn't like the light, slight and robust dishes. I'll be honest and say (sorry) that it is overpriced, especially the slight dishes - if the portions were bigger, then it would be spot on!


Some of the dishes we had were;


The betal leaves - The flavours burst in my mouth, loved it. Sweet, sour n saltiness spot on! If i had closed my eyes whilst chowing down i could of been back in Bangkok.


The fish cakes - 50/50 everyone agreed the flavours were zesty but the texture wasn't squidgy/squeaky enough, i personally didn't like the mashed potato consistency. But thats your take on it!


The tofu dish - was excellent and the greens salty and mourish! Yum.


Salmon - This was the one dish that we were all dissapointed with, it was tiny :O( I would love to see this as a robust dish with lots of salmon on or just give a little more for your money.


Squid - Tender


Rabbit - Thumbs up, loved your take on it, the addition of authentic ingredients ie pea aubergines!


Pork - The pork was extremely fatty, compared with the previous night. i know dingley dells have a higher proportion of fat but this dish also lacked depth of flavour. It wasn't a winner with anyone.


Unfortunately you had run out of the fish, our own fault we should of got there earlier!


We all agreed that we would LOVE to see the following on the menu ...


1. SOM TAM!!!!!!!! Always a winner. We would be there every week if you had this on the menu.


2. Pad Thai - i know everyone does it, but a classic done bloody well is always a winner and god there are so many poor ones about. There were no noodle dishes on the menu which was a bit odd.


3. Mussaman as a special ;o)


3. Bigger portions, better value for money. We could of all eaten more but didn't want to spend anymore on a school night.


They were so busy, it was a great atmosphere.


Thanks for a good night.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...