Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Seriously depressing that the earlier thread on this subject has been locked. I wanted to show my wife that it is not just us they hurl abuse at.


Can those who contributed restart the thread, and for the the benifit of those too easily offended tone it down. what is the world coming to?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2642-whateley-road-residents-lounged/
Share on other sites

Anyone who lives on or near Whateley Road will know who we are referring to. Without giving too much away, I seriously suggest reporting ANY anti-social behaviour to the Police Station at the end of the road (as I have done) and if they receive enough complaints there's a very good chance of them taking action. The police recently posted a leter through our door saying the same thing so they are very aware of the situation.


This may sound like a witch hunt to some but it's really not very nice.

Hi guys -


Glad you are supporting my thread on this before. They are foul people, totally anti-social.


Blocking my thread - just another example of letting these types of people get away with it!


You pay through the nose to live there, but have Wayne and Waynetta Slob type people ruin your community!

When we were looking at houses to buy just before Christmas the estate agent actually warned us about the people I assume you are talking about, despite having a house for sale themselves on Whateley! I am pleased to say, having read the earlier thread, that we ended up a couple of roads down instead. I will be avoiding walking that way home so thanks for the warnings everyone.

Come on chaps.

This thread was locked yesterday, not by some fascist act of censorship, but in response to a record number of complaints from users.


Remember this is a public forum for anyone and everyone to use. No reason why the people in question won't find out about this, read it and feel somewhat violated or disturbed by being publicly ridiculed.


I'm not sure I'd want to log on and read "I saw that mockney, jeez he's got a big nose, so full of himself, somebody should sort the numpty out" etc.


Whatever you may think of people, and we're all entitled to opinions, have some consideration. Have this conversation down the pub, but try and be a little more circumspect here is all I ask.

To help nudge the conversation along slightly, does anyone remember the semi-naked elvis and his girlfriend who would play their rockabilly at full blast whilst unsubtly snorting cocaine in the windows in front of everyone in the CPT?


MW, shouldn't that just be an abyss of social wrongness? Not that I've the foggiest what you're trying to say.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To help nudge the conversation along slightly,

> does anyone remember the semi-naked elvis and his

> girlfriend who would play their rockabilly at full

> blast whilst unsubtly snorting cocaine in the

> windows in front of everyone in the CPT?

>

> MW, shouldn't that just be an abyss of social

> wrongness? Not that I've the foggiest what you're

> trying to say.


it could be anything you would like it to be oh wise one.

MP I've had to reach for the dictionary at least three times today because of you (still can't find fascinae).


I met one of the residents in question the other day outside Bells. I wouldn't want to be a neighbour if the above is true, certainly didn't look friendly but then again I didn't feel threatened either. If the problem is so bad then surely the residents can get together and pressure the relevant authorities (housing association, police, social services) etc rather than coming out with all this Goose Green pillary nonsense. Doesn't put you in a much better light.


MW I hope you get over the lead poisoning.

  • Administrator

The previous thread was locked because of complaints and the fact that the thread identified individuals and ridiculed them. I understand why this thread was started again which is fine but some people crossed the line. I am asking you to not cross that line again out of consideration for others. There will not be other warnings on this particular matter.


And I'm putting this in the Lounge.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi All, Looking for recommendations in the following professions. Ideally based locally. -Psychiatrist -Psychologist  -Therapist (EMDR) -Child Psychiatrist ADHD and ASD exp - ideal Any information would be appriciated. C
    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...