Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just back to the original post - which I find quite intriguing - library services turning down free donations. I'm going to make an enquiry about how this practice has come about, as it strikes me the common sense policy would be to accept all donations buy a few more bookshelves and stock up, especially considering there will be a new library up at Grove Vale with twice the floor space to fill....


Lewis

a lot of times libraries would like to take donations but simply don't have the room or the donations are books they already have multiple copies of so the books just end up on the sale shelves or stuck in a back room taking up space. or the books they get are in such poor condition that they would disintegrate on the shelves. in theory most would love to ake all donations but sorting through the books,and then housing them until they can be sold or processed actually does take up a fair bit of time and space.


can you tell i used to work in a library?



donations are probably better off going to a charity shop in most instances unless you see your local library actively advertising for books.

The irony in all this is that LB Southwark paid to have Dulwich Library refurbished the other year and took out all the bookshelves that actually went with the building, installed new modern ugly too short and unstable free standing shelving units that don't go with the building - and spent not one penny on new books. I have been going to Dulwich Library since I was a child and it has never had a decent collection of books. Personally I get through a lot of books and look after them, and I would consider it 'bad form' to give a book to the library that I knew was falling apart, I would rather give them to a library where people could borrow them for free than to a however well-intentioned charity shop that will charge people for them. Call me picky.

I used to work ages ago as a library assistant and we did initally take donations but as was pointed out above, they took up an inordiante amount of space and we never had the time required to go through them, look them up on the catologue, label them, enter them in on the computer, etc. etc. Plus there was always the problem of books that were in poor condition or old textbooks that were so out-of-date they weren't accurate. And then we were lumbered with getting rid of these books which often took up about 40% of the donations. So we had to stop taking donations in the end


Seriously, it would be better to lobby the Council to increase the book budget than encourage donations of books to local libraries. Oxfam has several charity bookstores in London selling donated books.

If anyone out there has any books in French, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Russian or Swedish, including old dictionaries, reference books or encyclopedias, that they don't want, I would be very happy to take them off your hands. Not bothered about the condition of the books as long as they don't actually have those little weevil things running about in them.
  • 2 weeks later...

Scruffy Mummy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I used to work ages ago as a library assistant and

> we did initally take donations but as was pointed

> out above, they took up an inordiante amount of

> space and we never had the time required to go

> through them, look them up on the catologue, label

> them, enter them in on the computer, etc. etc.

> Plus there was always the problem of books that

> were in poor condition or old textbooks that were

> so out-of-date they weren't accurate.


Over the last twenty-five years I've always noticed that the IT/computer shelves of local libraries are always incredibly out of date. Generally by at least 10 years.


Many people would be willing to donate such books (l could restock Dulwich Library with a wide range of books on everything from human-computer interaction (generally only in uni libraries) to Windows apps (current versions) to... Subject matter is fast-changing and the books are expensive (mostly over ?25, many over ?35/40), making donations worthwhile I would have thought.


Though I've been a library member all my life, I so rarely use them now, as they rarely have books I want to look at. The most recent example was when I tried Dulwich Library for *anything* about running voluntary organisations/NGO's (a *huge* proportion of the population is involved in not-for-profits/NGO's/third sector orgs). They initially had two not very good, extremely old books, and within months both books were mysteriously 'withdrawn' and not replaced with anything. Library staff were at a loss to explain why this had happened, or why they had nothing at all on running third sector organisations. I gave up.




And then we

> were lumbered with getting rid of these books

> which often took up about 40% of the donations.

> So we had to stop taking donations in the end

>

> Seriously, it would be better to lobby the Council

> to increase the book budget than encourage

> donations of books to local libraries. Oxfam has

> several charity bookstores in London selling

> donated books.

I think your all being spectacularly naive(sp?) once again - Taking books off Joe Public = being a charity and not a subsidised council service and could well result in Mr or Ms councillor reducing funds/budget. Library is being politically smart. Does nearly everyone else on this forum live in a Camberwick Green share & share world of make and do/no political intrigue see you at the bandstand at 4pm world? (ok, that was Trumpton).
The answer to the question what is the council's actual policy will be provided in writing at Council Assembly this evening and I'll post it tomorrow morning. It is also interesting to note that the District Auditor's letter discussed at Audit Committee last week raised a concern that not enough Southwark residents are using our library services.....
The policy is that the library service will accept donations, on the understanding they meet a number of criteria; physical condition; currency of information;subject matter; potential for use and whether the item meets legislation affecting libraries. If they do not, they reserve the right to offer them for sale or reuse.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes they do, but that is not the core tenet of representative democracy. At that level, we are voting for a parliamentary representative, irregardless of whether parties exist or not. It's why candidates can stand as independents. 
    • Sadly I think you will never convince people like this. They think gardens have to be kept chopped back and controlled. My theory is that this comes from being (or trying to be) controlling in every aspect of their lives, so I doubt if anything you could say or show them would have any effect. But are they actually coming into your garden or leaning over into it and pulling up/damaging things? If so, maybe one of our community police people could have a word with them?
    • Dear Nature lovers - advice please. I am being harassed by a neighbour who doesn't like my standard of gardening which she calls 'messy'. (I have rewilded my garden with advice from the London Wildlife Trust and a gardening expert from The Times.) I have twice caught this neighbour and her husband pulling up my plants and damaging my trees. Plus she has photographed my house, and sent a dozen complaints to the Dulwich Estate about my plan to rewild the verge outside my property - approved by the Estate some 4 years ago in line with their stated policy of supporting biodiversity in and around Dulwich. What can I do to introduce these neighbours  to the benefits to us all of returning a portion of our gardens to nature?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...