Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The programme showed up the lack of any vision from Paddick and Johnson. Simply saying you are going to sort out London's problems, with little of idea of how to do it, is pathetic.


I think Paddick's rather cute in a sort of ex-copper way and none other the candidates would be seen with their tops off in a nightclub. I just think there is some other role for him outside of party politics. He seems straightkjacketed by having to toe the party line and comes across as wooden.


Boris a buffoon. No matter how much the papers try to big him up. He would be a disaster.


I thought this was Paxman at his best.

Have just watched it


Paddick seems a bit too reactionary to me - willing to expose the loopholes in the policy making of others but with ill-defined stances himself in many areas. The areas in which he's strong minded seem to be the areas which could do with a little discussion and moderation.


All of the negative points that this thread has highlighted about Boris were amply demonstrated, Paxman using his patented technique of bullishly handing out just enough rope.


For me, it's a one horse race.

so who do we vote for then? I want to vote but there are no real options. Green party could be a good option but as someone mentioned having someone whose every move has to be agreed by a commitee as the Green party does, it kind of dilutes decision making. Also there is the fear that if I vote Green, Boris will get in.

I do find Boris funny but also agree his bumbling loveability is an act and I certainly dont want him to be in a position of any power or influence. Someone smart and reasonable tell me who to vote for! (I think that pretty much means you Sean eheheh)

Alan Dale Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think a sensible vote would be one that ensures

> our next mayor doesn't describe black people as

> picanninies.


So you could vote for the man that calls a Jewish journalist no better than a concentration camp guard.

Marmora Man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Dale Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think a sensible vote would be one that

> ensures

> > our next mayor doesn't describe black people as

> > picanninies.

>

> So you could vote for the man that calls a Jewish

> journalist no better than a concentration camp

> guard.


Come off it MM. I've read enough of your posts on the forum to know you're not that silly to take that story at face value. Firstly, Ken was steaming drunk and we all say daft things then. Secondly, he didn't know the reporter was Jewish - how would you (unless he wears a kippah on paparazzi detail)? And thirdly, Ken was referring to the fact that the reporter worked for Associated Newspapers, sympathisers of the Nazi regime in the 30s, and so therefore he was no better than a camp guard with the "just following orders" excuse.


It wasn't the cleverest thing to come out with but it doesn't really compare to the rather unpleasant undertones in the Johnson "picaninies" furore. In the article in question, Johnson mocked Tony Blair's brief visits to world troublespots, acting as "SuperTony", bringing peace to the world while the UK deteriorated; Blair would arrive as "the tribal warriors will all break out in watermelon smiles to see the big white chief", just as "it is said the Queen has come to love the Commonwealth, partly because it supplies her with regular cheering crowds of flag-waving piccaninnies".


Frankly I find that a lot more unpleasant and not far short of thinly veiled racism.

Ken is drunk on power. He thinks he can do what he wants, is profligate with his cash and is a crony magnet par excellence. Boris will be on his best behaviour because his Tory betters will need him to produce results so that they can oust Brown and co in a few year's time. Boris for Mayor! Nero

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>> >

> Come off it MM. I've read enough of your posts on

> the forum to know you're not that silly to take

> that story at face value. Firstly, Ken was

> steaming drunk and we all say daft things then.

> Secondly, he didn't know the reporter was Jewish -

> how would you (unless he wears a kippah on

> paparazzi detail)? And thirdly, Ken was referring

> to the fact that the reporter worked for

> Associated Newspapers, sympathisers of the Nazi

> regime in the 30s, and so therefore he was no

> better than a camp guard with the "just following

> orders" excuse.

>

> It wasn't the cleverest thing to come out with but

> it doesn't really compare to the rather unpleasant

> undertones in the Johnson "picaninies" furore. In

> the article in question, Johnson mocked Tony

> Blair's brief visits to world troublespots, acting

> as "SuperTony", bringing peace to the world while

> the UK deteriorated; Blair would arrive as "the

> tribal warriors will all break out in watermelon

> smiles to see the big white chief", just as "it is

> said the Queen has come to love the Commonwealth,

> partly because it supplies her with regular

> cheering crowds of flag-waving piccaninnies".

>

> Frankly I find that a lot more unpleasant and not

> far short of thinly veiled racism.



I wouldn't even say it was thinly veiled.


BTW - Although Ken's words where perhaps ill chosen, surely the sentiment was fair enough? Isn't it analaogous to saying a black person is capable of racism etc ? I understand that in the immediate aftermath of the remark, Ken was both lauded AND condemned by members of London's Jewish community.

Ok folks, let's deconstruct what Boris said. He's alluding to unsavoury old-world values and words to satirise Blair and the Queen. He is not racist, but he's referring to racism. So Boris is not racist. He's a loundmouth, but that's what politicians are. Ken is not good for London anymore. The GLA needs a good shake-up, otherwise it will end up like the GLC. Nero

tinagwee Wrote:

-- Also there is the fear

> that if I vote Green, Boris will get in.

>

As I understand it (sorry I don't have the correct terminology to hand - its a bit early for me), you have 2 votes, so if you vote Greens first and Ken second, then you'll not be voting for Boris.

I have detials of 7 people in London who will not be voting. I try not to vote, it only encourages these parasites, but I am willing to spend a day trundling about and vote in these 7 peoples names in any way I like


Whats it worth for Snorky to vote for your favoured candidate ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Another recommendation for Dulwich Test and Services Centre. Only been using them for a couple of years but wish I’d found them earlier 
    • A new roadmap (surely railmap?!) for rail accessibility has been published: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/accessible-railways-roadmap It says "approximately 56% of stations and around 66% of the 1.3 billion journeys that take place on the network have step-free access to platforms...  "£373 million has been committed over the next 5 years to deliver Access for All projects, providing step-free access from station entrances to and between platforms, alongside other essential accessibility upgrades. These works, together, will increase the number of step-free stations across Great Britain from 56% to 58%. "This improvement will make travel easier with step-free access available at stations covering an increased share of total rail journeys – from 66% up to 71%" Don't know what that means for us here: upgrading Peckham Rye would cover a lot of rail journeys but the cost has no doubt increased from the £40m figure previously quoted. So that would eat into a lot of the funding.
    • It's not really though, is it. It's practical.  At least we're allowed Christmas lights.
    • We are the only specialist floor insulation company on the market to focus on insulating from below – meaning almost zero mess, disruption or noise! Warmdwell is extremely proud to receive the highest reviews for our professionalism, reliability, commitment and the all-round ease of doing business with us: we draw our team from professional, creative, educated backgrounds to provide a friendly, problem-solving team with the deepest integrity. We take real care of your home and aim to leave it as spotless as possible. Please check our Google Reviews to speak for us: "We were really pleased with their quote, communication, and with having the job done perfectly with almost zero disruption. We think they left the space cleaner than when they arrived, and we are definitely already getting the effects of a warmer room" – Miriam & Abed, Sevenoaks, Oct 2025 "Laurence and his team were extremely polite & helpful, and the work was performed over just 2 days with minimal disruption. It was absolutely the most relaxed work I have ever had performed on the house!" – Alistair, Cambridge, July 2025 "Extremely friendly, polite and efficient" – Diane, Forest Hill, June 2025 We are always keen to chat through your floor insulation options and provide as much free advice as we can, as well as free quotes and surveys – so why not ask us today about what is possible to protect your floors from the cold ventilation air blowing underneath, keep your heat in and warm up your home? We use high-performance mineral wool slabs, never foam, for so many reasons: it is the ideal flexible material for the irregularities of old floors; is breathable, working with the way your floor has successfully performed for perhaps 100 years or more; can easily be removed to access pipes and cables; and is completely non-combustible. A local business based in Crystal Palace, we work extensively around Dulwich, Herne Hill, Forest Hill, Lewisham, Tooting, Balham and across the south East of England. Please ask us about your floor insulation options or for local project case studies today! Phone Number: 02080792793 Email Address: [email protected] Website: https://warmdwell.co.uk/ View full listing
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...