Jump to content

Recommended Posts

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> seanmac is absolutely fine - I've been called that

> by some people since my teens and twenties anyway

> so it's no biggy

>

> I refuse to refer to you as bignumber5 in real

> life tho..



That seems fair - it doesn't quite roll off the tongue, does it?!

  • 7 months later...

I think almost 1 year in (my anniversary next week) I am somewhere between 2 and 3... Only 721 posts in a year so not too bad..


Stage 2 (Regular)

- reads the Forum weekly, even on holiday

- has started a thread on a frivolous topic

- no longer gets a telling off by boss for unexplained random giggling, just receives a hard look and a sigh

- wouldn't miss a Forum drink

- number of posts less than 500


Stage 3 (Addict)

- reads the Forum daily, even on holiday

- has started a thread on a serious topic, and fought off opposition from all comers

- Forum has been mentioned in annual appraisal

- invites other Forumites to important personal events in Real Life

- has secret crush on one or more other prominent Forumite

- has trouble deciding whether to go to next Forum drink or brother's wedding

- number of posts less than 2000

clever(tu)

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Stage 1 (Newbie)

> - reads the forum from time to time

> - has been caught by boss giggling at Forum

> - has posted on someone else's thread

> - has very possibly been given a kicking by

> regular Forumites for "having a hidden agenda"

> - is seriously but nervously considering going to

> a Forum drink

> - number of posts less than 100

>

> Stage 2 (Regular)

> - reads the Forum weekly, even on holiday

> - has started a thread on a frivolous topic

> - no longer gets a telling off by boss for

> unexplained random giggling, just receives a hard

> look and a sigh

> - wouldn't miss a Forum drink

> - number of posts less than 500

>

> Stage 3 (Addict)

> - reads the Forum daily, even on holiday

> - has started a thread on a serious topic, and

> fought off opposition from all comers

> - Forum has been mentioned in annual appraisal

> - invites other Forumites to important personal

> events in Real Life

> - has secret crush on one or more other prominent

> Forumite

> - has trouble deciding whether to go to next Forum

> drink or brother's wedding

> - number of posts less than 2000

>

> Stage 4 (Conversion Complete)

> - has difficulty distinguishing between Forum and

> Real Life.

> - gets jittery if not able to log on several times

> a day

> - has had Forum addiction cited in breakup with

> partner / divorce proceedings / getting fired

> - has been summoned to the Quiet Room

> - (if male) has not-so-secret crush on Dulwichmum

> - (if female) has not-so-secret crush on James

> Nesbitt - (only kidding!)

> - number of posts ...

  • 2 years later...

;WITH cool_threads AS (

SELECT thread_id = t.id

FROM threads t

WHERE EXISTS (

SELECT *

FROM messages m

JOIN users u ON m.author_id = u.id

WHERE

m.thread_id = t.id AND

u.user_name IN ('moos', '????', 'Brendan', 'Mikecg'*/because we need to remember/* ... snip ... )

)

)

DELETE

FROM messages

FROM messages m

WHERE NOT EXISTS (

SELECT *

FROM cool_threads ct

WHERE ct.thread_id = m.thread_id

)

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...