Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This is my last thread on East Dulwich forum and something I feel very strong about, the closure of the post office in Melbourne grove.

Bellenden residents are petitioning to keep it open and i wish them the best of luck, Lordship lane Post office is already very busy, this closure will only add to this.

The local post office in Forest hill closed down a while ago, so all the forest hill patrons are now using primarily Lordship lane, which is not a practical solution, for some residents who live near the forest hill post office.

There is a residential facility who look after the partially sighted and registered blind, based on Lordship lane near the Hornimans museum, and i know the residents of the facility now have to use The post office on Lordship lane.

So Ed Forumites if you want to object to yet another closure of a much needed post office please email

[email protected]

Thanks

  • 4 weeks later...

Six days after the London elections, it has been confirmed that confirmed that all eight post offices in Southwark that were under threat will get the chop - including Melbourne Grove.


You can't help but wonder at the cynicism of the timing of this announcement. more on my blog

But that's the game isn't it. Cynical politicking...


Cllr Thomas surely wouldn't suggest that he and his cohorts at Southwark Council don't machinate with the best of them...


There have been some interesting planning decisions recently.


Some Southwark funded capital projects have met with resistance from cllrs on the executive at planning meetings. These meetings happened to take place just a short while before announcements were made about budget cuts that affected those very capital spends. If the planning had been approved the projects would have steamed ahead. As it is their budgets can be cut.


A cynic might raise an eyebrow at that and infer ulterior motives.


Someone else might baulk at conspiracy theories.


I'm not sure what I think. But I know that politics is a rich bouillabaise and you can't blame a fish for smelling fishy. Its part of the deal.

Everyone who voted last Thursday knew the situation with regard to Post Offices and which ones were earmarked for closure.


It might have been possible to cry 'cynical' if the consultation process and the announcement of the branches due to be closed had been made today - but the fact is that the information was all out there and had been dropped into the middle of the London election campaign. The fact that this thread started on March 30th is testament to that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...