Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This is my last thread on East Dulwich forum and something I feel very strong about, the closure of the post office in Melbourne grove.

Bellenden residents are petitioning to keep it open and i wish them the best of luck, Lordship lane Post office is already very busy, this closure will only add to this.

The local post office in Forest hill closed down a while ago, so all the forest hill patrons are now using primarily Lordship lane, which is not a practical solution, for some residents who live near the forest hill post office.

There is a residential facility who look after the partially sighted and registered blind, based on Lordship lane near the Hornimans museum, and i know the residents of the facility now have to use The post office on Lordship lane.

So Ed Forumites if you want to object to yet another closure of a much needed post office please email

[email protected]

Thanks

  • 4 weeks later...

Six days after the London elections, it has been confirmed that confirmed that all eight post offices in Southwark that were under threat will get the chop - including Melbourne Grove.


You can't help but wonder at the cynicism of the timing of this announcement. more on my blog

But that's the game isn't it. Cynical politicking...


Cllr Thomas surely wouldn't suggest that he and his cohorts at Southwark Council don't machinate with the best of them...


There have been some interesting planning decisions recently.


Some Southwark funded capital projects have met with resistance from cllrs on the executive at planning meetings. These meetings happened to take place just a short while before announcements were made about budget cuts that affected those very capital spends. If the planning had been approved the projects would have steamed ahead. As it is their budgets can be cut.


A cynic might raise an eyebrow at that and infer ulterior motives.


Someone else might baulk at conspiracy theories.


I'm not sure what I think. But I know that politics is a rich bouillabaise and you can't blame a fish for smelling fishy. Its part of the deal.

Everyone who voted last Thursday knew the situation with regard to Post Offices and which ones were earmarked for closure.


It might have been possible to cry 'cynical' if the consultation process and the announcement of the branches due to be closed had been made today - but the fact is that the information was all out there and had been dropped into the middle of the London election campaign. The fact that this thread started on March 30th is testament to that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello,  I feel as though our apartment is damp. I would like to borrow a dehumidifier to ascertain whether it is or not. Does anyone have a dehumidifier that I could borrow for a week?  thank you,    Brigid
    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...