Jump to content

New restaurant


Hazleharman

Recommended Posts

EDLove Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Agree with Jomou, if only to stop more people

> reaching for their French dictionaries!


Yep. We can make this whole thing easier by eliminating anything French, anything containing part of the address/postcode, and anything containing the words "social", "experiment", "project", "canteen", or "club".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> wine related punnage?

>

> Que Syrah

> Greenache

> Pinner Noir (hmm, wrong neighbourhood)

> Shabbly Chic


Now you're talking-


Brouilly for You

The Cava'ry

Vin or Dinner

Semillon Dollar Babies

Roll out the Barolo

or (my favourite) Claret & Booze!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, I admit to being a bit geeky but I have looked at what 38 lordship lane was back in 1891 and 1901 on the census. In 1891 there was a 'surveyor of meat' living there and in 1901 a family of butchers. I couldn't see it in 1881 so assume it was built after then? Maybe you could go with a meaty name? The butcher or the surveyor of meat?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • It was an absolute shit show. And so much anger coming from both sides, not becoming at all (was surprised how riled cool Rishi was getting).  Agree about the format, it was lazy, whatsherchops wasn't asking pertinent questions, she was just going for binary yesses or nos. The producers didn't force either side to drill down on anything, just make commitments so they got good soundbites.  If I hear 'my father was a tool maker' / my wife's a nurse / my father was a GP one more time... as if any of those things qualify anyone to fix / understand anything. 
    • Good.  Subsidence claims generally have an excess of £1000 per claim, but was yours higher?
    • Indeed, many house here have had or will have subsidence issues so one needs to bear that in mind.  Many houses here have shallow foundations but they have been around 100 years or so without too much issue. What the surveyor has told you doesn't feel like a 'red flag', more of a sensible warning.  Bear in mind that although the surveyor is nominally working for you, their focus iln reality is mostly on the lender and the risk of being sued, either by them or you.  So they are always pretty cautious.  It would be wise to get a 2nd opinion, eg. from a structural engineer.  Or talk  to the original surveyor directly as they may say more than they are prepared to put in a report.  It's a little difficult from the description to identify what the situation is but the scenario in which part of a property has been underpinned and the rest has not is fairly common here.  The proximity of trees is likely to be the main thing to be concerned about, particularly after the hot summer of 2002, as insurers generally regard them as risky, especially if they are not cut back from time to time.  A second surveyor can advise directly on this. It would definitely be worth trying to take over the current buildings insurance.  Indeed, it may be quite hard to find new cover.  Enquire what the current premium is and who the policy is ultiimately underwitten by (ie. is it a name that you have ever heard of?)  The insurance industry, in general, works to a guideline that the insurance of an underpinned property should transfer to a new owner.   https://www.biba.org.uk/insurance-guides/home-insurance-guides/subsidence/
    • More than the 2 contestants, the format and production was the main fault last night - allowing 45 seconds for an answer will get you those responses from any 2 candidates Awful show
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...