Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I thought that those of us who are a bit miffed about the election outcome could use a happy-place.


This is a place to reminisce about the 2 terms of Red Ken. Please, no heated debate (we've either already done it or there are other threads going...)


Posts that follow on from the thread title "Farewell Ken: thank you for..."

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3208-farewell-ken-thank-you-for/
Share on other sites

Thanks Ken for being a supporter of Gay Rights, setting up the Register of Partnerships before the Labour Government introduced Civil Partnerships. As well as turning up to meetings and Gay Pride events for so many years in support.


Thanks for standing up against the opportunism of the Evening Standard.


Thank you for getting on Margaret Thatcher's nerves.

the bendy buses, no one needs to pay fares on when they sit in the back bit.


the congestion charge which pushes the traffic somewhere else, and makes a playground for the rich.


changing the traffic lights so the drivers can nod off at stop and the pedestrians have to hang about longer on the curb breathing in the fumes.


your distinctly nasal whining voice, like a kid who wants something but his mother is not listening


not becoming leader of the labour party.


giving out many thousands of pounds to weird "businesses" that neither earned nor deserved a grant from the glc.


leaving your undeserved trough, to another unnecessary snout.

...for getting us though 7/7/5 with real leadership

...for the congestion charge

...for oyster cards and bendy buses

...for doing what was best for London even if it wasn't popular at the time


and, since it probably hasn't been easy


...for taking decent holidays ;-)

leaving an unnecessary job

to another undeserving untalented chump

for another four year term of squandering our money

what was the value of your budget?

and did we approve it?

I don't remember agreeing to any thing,

you worked in headlight house which never illuminates the wrong doings of its inhabitants.

goodbye ken please take boris with you and anyone else who fancies he's qualified for this non-job

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> walking across the North side of Trafalgar Square

> yesterday - looking at all the tourists bimble

> about and enjoying the sights - and reflecting

> what a traffic-choked hell it used to be. Heaven

>

> Something Boris wouldn't have done...


Sean - low blow. You cannot say, with any certainty, what Boris would or would not have done.


In fact, given Boris Johnson's quoted appreciation of Pericles and Athenian politics he may well have supported the creation of such a great public space. I certainly do - Trafalgar Square and the galleries are now a great spot to meet, greet and generally people watch in London.

Now play fair people, read the opening post, this thread was meant to be about what Ken did well, not another Ken V's Boris debate.


I'd like to second the congestion charge, Trafalgar Square, increased bus services AND bendy buses (I like them).


His response to the July 7th bombs is also something I'll always remember. I'm not usually a fan of rousing speeches, but in July 2005 we had just come back from living in NZ, cutting short a year-long stay becuase we missed London and wanted to come home. As a Londoner and someone working in the emergency services (not very front line that day I have to admit. On stand-by feeling utterly impotent in and empty emergency department south of the river) I felt quite emotional about this attack on my home town and Ken's response was exactly right at the time.



A "low" blow? Really? I didn't even consider it a blow much less a low one. From every utterance I have heard from Boris and the black-cab drivers who supported him they consider the pedestrianising of the that bit of Trafalgar Sq to be a crime against humanity. One cab driver was apoplectic on BBC London this weekend saying you can't even call it a square now because of what Ken did (thus illustrating how for some people the world can only be viewed as serving "the car" - I do wonder what Trafalgar Sq was called before the car was invented!)

Boris has also said he would re-phase traffic lights in favour of cars over pedestrians, which makes it unlikely he would do anything as challenging as re-allocating road space in favour of people on foot.


Ken was planning to do the same in Parliament Square as was done in Trafalgar Square, which would have been excellent. Let's see if Boris is prepared to do the same.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • And from what I remember, she eventually cut the tea shop for a similar  reason to chandelier.  Chariot style buggies
    • Oh yes, it could have been about there, I can't remember exactly. At one point there seemed to be a load of pizza places opening on NCR. I vaguely remember the one we used to use was put out of business by another one which opened. Wasn't Grace and Favour's food offering more of a tea shop at the back of the actual shop? If memory serves the owner, whose name escapes me now, was one of the earliest people I know to move to Hastings. Which must now be crammed with South East Londoners 🤣
    • That Neal Street veggie cafe was great. Food For Thought ❤️
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, You won't be aware that i proposed infill sites for housing in East Dulwich - the garages on Bassano Street and Henslowe that respectively became 1-4 Dill Terrace family houses and the 78, 80, 80A Henslowe Street family houses. These were council owned garages and it was frustrating how slow the council was to go from my idea to completion (roughly eight years). East Dulwich has some other vacant WW2 bomb sites I'm guessing that the private land owners have been sitting on.Owe for a land tax for vacant land.  WRT to the builders yard by East dulwich station. Southwark Council has an agreed policy the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum. But the approved scheme is 9 storeys of student accommodation. Very hard to put this genie back in the bottle. The council has recently publicly stated lower ratios of social housing will be required. I will be amazed if the developer doesn't submit another application now they have the 9 storeys approved but with significantly less social housing. The less social housing the higher the land values. The higher the land values the less social housing viability reports state are possible.  If we really want to increase home supply - Southwark have over 6,000 empty homes. Vancouver charges a low % of the value of empty homes and rapidly eased this problem. Parts of Wales have introduced under Article 4 planning permission is required for second homes seeing within 12 months a dramatic decrease in property prices. Southwark Council have Article 4 requirements - why not add this one? It takes National political will to solve this AND regional and local authorities such as the second home council tax premium and these being used promptly. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...