Jump to content

Recommended Posts

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> hiw is that different from a cinema tho Jeremy?


A church such as this will be serving a much wider geographical area that a cinema.


I'm assuming that people who live relatively locally are much more likely to walk or use public transport.

As I live near the Deeper Life Bible Church, I can tell you what would happen if KICC open up as a church using them as an example.


Traffic jams along LL as churchgoers attempt to turn right into the car park at 10.30am with others using side streets such as Underhill Road, Melford Road and Wood Vale to park when the church is full.


The two bus stops nearest the church are full after the service ends.


These type of churches attract a huge congregation. There are churches in North/East London which can take up to 1,000 people.


Considering The Capitol also faces residential housing, noise pollution may also be an issue, in particular during evening services.

Not merely will the new church, if there is one, occupy space which would have been of much greater amenity to locals used otherwise (if it is true that such churches attract users from far afield) but it will place huge usage stress locally (i.e. parking, congestion etc.) but will, as a church, be excused most taxes and rates which would be placed on any normal commercial enterprise, even though numbers of these churches are effectively very nice little earners for their pastors.


I am never happier than when I see former religious premises re-used as housing, as offices, as anything other than for their original purpose; I am never sadder than when I see good property alienated to a god squad (of any demomination, creed or faith).

Unacceptable? Moral bankruptcy? Blighting modern life? I would agree with all of your post northlonder, except for the ill-informed sarcasm.


KICC encourage the congregation to pray for wealth - people go there because they think the church can make them rich, or at least solve their money problems. Now, while I think that people can believe whatever they like, that doesn't mean I approve of quacks preying on the vulnerable or giving them false hope.


But that's the tip of the iceberg. Look up the chuch's leader, Matthew Ashimolowo. He has paid himself hundreds of thousands of pounds out of the church's "charities" (in addition to the six figure salary he draws), as well as cyphoning money into his other business interests. The man is a crook. The church is a fraud.

Good news of sorts. The councillor who made the original comments is now saying the KICC haven?t bought the venue but that it was a rumour he had heard that he was simply passing on.


However until Wetherspoons reveal who they have sold to I wouldn?t breathe a sigh of relief until then. Picturehouse were looking to buy the old bingo hall in Crystal Palace but were outbid by the cash rich KICC and now 5 years later the building remains rarely used except for unlawful religious events and every other suburb in the vicinity of Crystal Palace has some sort of cinema in the works.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Unacceptable? Moral bankruptcy? Blighting modern

> life? I would agree with all of your post

> northlonder, except for the ill-informed sarcasm.

>

> KICC encourage the congregation to pray for wealth

> - people go there because they think the church

> can make them rich, or at least solve their money

> problems. Now, while I think that people can

> believe whatever they like, that doesn't mean I

> approve of quacks preying on the vulnerable or

> giving them false hope.

>

> But that's the tip of the iceberg. Look up the

> chuch's leader, Matthew Ashimolowo. He has paid

> himself hundreds of thousands of pounds out of the

> church's "charities" (in addition to the six

> figure salary he draws), as well as cyphoning

> money into his other business interests. The man

> is a crook. The church is a fraud.


Fair enough. My favourite pastor from one of these churches is called Creflo Dollar. No, really.

Amazed and delighted that people are paying so much attention to my posts.



Dear BrandNewGuy


"If malcolmchurch doesn't apologise here for spreading unfounded rumours about the Capitol, I'll find it as "insulting" as he did my suggestion that his cinema saga was all rumour and hearsay. Actually, I won't - my skin's thicker than that."


My post was not unfounded and was based on facts regarding what the Wetherspoons staff had been told by their manager and so I was insulted that you accused me of spreading false rumours. So I have nothing to apologise for.


Dear Zebedee, I so wish that I did know everything that was going on.


I am a very regular drinker in The Capitol and have got to know some of the staff very well. All of my information has come from them although they will be forced to deny it from casual enquiries.


The current story from them is that the KICC will not happen and that the Picturehouse taking over is under negotiation...


Hopefully it will not happen as I would love it to stay as a Wetherspoons.

malcolmchurch Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Amazed and delighted that people are paying so

> much attention to my posts.


Good for you.


> Dear BrandNewGuy

>

> "If malcolmchurch doesn't apologise here for

> spreading unfounded rumours about the Capitol,

> I'll find it as "insulting" as he did my

> suggestion that his cinema saga was all rumour and

> hearsay. Actually, I won't - my skin's thicker

> than that."

>

> My post was not unfounded and was based on facts

> regarding what the Wetherspoons staff had been

> told by their manager and so I was insulted that

> you accused me of spreading false rumours. So I

> have nothing to apologise for.


I don't really want an apology, but if you'd said originally that your claim was based on what you'd heard, that would have been fine. But your original post was:


?I thought you might be interested to know that The Capitol pub (Wetherspoons) in Forest Hill will close as a pub in the next 3-6 weeks and re-open as a cinema.?


Which became:

?The staff believe that it will become a cinema but that is not so certain as there are several things to be done.?


And eventually:

?Capitol (Wetherspoons) staff 90% sure it will happen?


"... based on facts regarding what the Wetherspoons staff had been told" is hearsay and it would have been nice to say so in your original post.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...