Jump to content

Recommended Posts

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The c1949 building at 117-125 Rye Lane is not a

> shopping arcade.

>

> I am aware that a number of people would like to

> see Station Arcade destroyed.

>

> I also understand why someone's personal taste

> should prefer an imitation continental style to

> Englishe vernacular.

>

> John K


I'm not disputing the fact that the arcade (shopping, station, or otherwise) has merit and appeal, but its effect in being placed in front of another station and thus meaning only access is through dark, dank and unpleasant alleyways, is a negative one. If it was a building on its own I would argue it should be protected. But it's not. Opening up the front of the station would surely be in the public good. In my opinion anyway...

What jimmy said


I don't think the current facade is especially good, but it could be worth saving in another context


Given the potential choices I'm all for opening up that part of rye lane, permitting a pleasing and different aspect. It would (IMO) give rye lane new lungs and a focal point


The current facade, however worthy, isn't even noticed by... At a guess, at least 95% of people. It fails in its job to please the eye if the eye isn't even aware of it

As a local resident of 68 years i am fed up with living in a sh..t hole.


That whole area is a dump. How many residents can remember dunns the outfitters on that entrance. When rye lane was something to be proud of.


Walk down rye lane and station entrance early morning before it all gets busy and see how rank the pavements are and the fifth that is engrained everywhere.


There is nothing to save. Start from new

As someone who has been using Peckham Rye station for the last four years or so, I completely agree with Spider. Whilst I wasn't fortunate enough to live in the area when Rye Lane was in its heyday, I have read up on what it was like, and find it so sad that it has become the litter-strewn road that it is today.


Fortunately from what I've heard it sounds like the wheels are in motion to restore the station to at least a glimmer of its former glory, and about time too.



spider69 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As a local resident of 68 years i am fed up with

> living in a sh..t hole.

>

> That whole area is a dump. How many residents can

> remember dunns the outfitters on that entrance.

> When rye lane was something to be proud of.

>

> Walk down rye lane and station entrance earlier

> morning before it all gets busy and see how rank

> the pavements are and the fifth that is engrained

> everywhere.

>

> There is nothing to save. Start from new

Well then, the sooner it is razed to the ground and rebuilt, the better!!


woodrot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> the hipster vermin wouldnt stand for a revamp -

> they are poverty tourists and love the seedy run

> down neglected shittyness of the place.

And by the way, does anybody actually *like* the balls of tumbleweave that are basically now a permanent fixture of the roads around the station? I'm becoming a bit fed-up of getting bits of fake hair caught in my sandals to be honest.


Why don't these businesses give a damn about their environment or the effect it has on anyone else? It's really horrible :(

Well it seems that is what Peckham Vision are aiming to do - and it can't come soon enough in my opinion. It's sad how horribly neglected it has all become.


spider69 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How much imagination does it take to picture the

> whole area completely redeveloped with the station

> as the centre

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You do get the feeling - 10 years and nothing will

> change the way things are moving.

>

> More young professionals with no links to the area

> moving in and they really won't care

> about razing the whole place - so if PV want to do

> it properly - I'd advice now.


I don't think you should be so hasty to tar all newcomers with the same brush JohnL. So far as your loose definition goes, I might class as a 'newcomer' - I moved to the area four years ago, and am probably a young (ish) professional. I've made it my home and want to stay here for quite a few years to come. I don't have links to the area, no, but does that make a huge difference? I care about what it is like now; and what it is like in the future - as do most of my neighbours from what I can tell. I don't want to make Peckham something it isn't but I welcome the efforts that are going into making it a more welcoming central hub for all of the community

"I note the "bigger is better" suggested criterion for why the Brixton arcades have been listed and why Station Arcade has not been lisited.


Unless there is a simliar building elsewhere then Station Arcade is the sole survivor of its type.


The railway station received its listing on 31 January 2008.


"Squat" is an interesting verb to use.


I know that there is an argument for the destruction of our architectural heritage when it is inconvenient and in the way, even if it is a unique building."



Peckham's Station Arcade may be the sole survivor of its type, and therefore unique, but that in itself does not make it worthy of being preserved, imo. The Brixton Arcades are bigger but that's not the only thing they had going for them. My previous post was written in haste. When I came to live in Brixton in 92, the Arcades were already pretty run down and spent several more years getting progressively more so. However, even at their most unloved, they had a presence, a sense of potential, that Station Arcade lacks.


Squat was used with reference to something sitting on its knees. But perhaps I'm being unfair and it isn't really a toad of a building. Perhaps if the plans for the Station don't go ahead, the Arcade will live up to your estimation and transform itself into a worthy alternative centre of focus for Rye Lane. Perhaps not. Therein squats the toad.

I've been here 7 years and like some things - others (the hair for

instance) I hate.


My shared ownership flat stayed in negative equity for 6 years odd

just out now - and that's including payments.


Just feel a lot of people in London won't be that patient.


jimmyraj Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > You do get the feeling - 10 years and nothing

> will

> > change the way things are moving.

> >

> > More young professionals with no links to the

> area

> > moving in and they really won't care

> > about razing the whole place - so if PV want to

> do

> > it properly - I'd advice now.

>

> I don't think you should be so hasty to tar all

> newcomers with the same brush JohnL. So far as

> your loose definition goes, I might class as a

> 'newcomer' - I moved to the area four years ago,

> and am probably a young (ish) professional. I've

> made it my home and want to stay here for quite a

> few years to come. I don't have links to the

> area, no, but does that make a huge difference? I

> care about what it is like now; and what it is

> like in the future - as do most of my neighbours

> from what I can tell. I don't want to make

> Peckham something it isn't but I welcome the

> efforts that are going into making it a more

> welcoming central hub for all of the community

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think they key thing is with the Peckham Vision

> lot is that they love where they live, and want to

> bring out the best in it. Not transform it into

> something it isn't.


thanks - not always easy to convey on websites and in these cyber forums, but yes definitely. Hope anyone who shares that vision will join us through the following links:

http://www.peckhamvision.org


http://www.facebook.com/PeckhamVision

email list: [email protected]

Hi Eileen, do you know when the proposed works to Peckham Rye Station - creating the public square etc - are due to begin? I can't seem to find any information on it and am dying to know!


Many thanks.


Eileen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeremy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think they key thing is with the Peckham

> Vision

> > lot is that they love where they live, and want

> to

> > bring out the best in it. Not transform it into

> > something it isn't.

>

> thanks - not always easy to convey on websites and

> in these cyber forums, but yes definitely. Hope

> anyone who shares that vision will join us through

> the following links:

> http://www.peckhamvision.org

>


> http://www.facebook.com/PeckhamVision

> email list: [email protected]

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I may have missed it, but I can't see anything

> about the station garden in the Peckham Vision

> documentation.

> John K


We have the photo of the front garden and it is up on our Peckham Rye Station facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=402539499816950&set=a.394475537290013.91389.319532484784319&type=1&theater


I like the map you have linked to showing that and a back garden - can you get me a digital version I can use? Any more info about the whole garden set up then?

Girl82 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi Eileen, do you know when the proposed works to

> Peckham Rye Station - creating the public square

> etc - are due to begin? I can't seem to find any

> information on it and am dying to know!


Possibly 2015. There is a lot of work going on behind the scenes to plan and design it, as a number of buildings and businesses are affected. We had hoped that there would all this year be a public conversation about the design but we heard recently that the Council and Network Rail are aiming to go straight to planning application by October / November before the end of the year. So we are aiming to stimulate a public conversation about the design in these cyber forums before then. Please see here for the latest on that:

Station development plans - http://www.peckhamvision.org/wiki/Peckham_Rye_Station_Gateway#Public_conversation_about_the_design_of_the_station_developments_August_2013

Peckham Rye Station background - http://www.peckhamvision.org/wiki/Peckham_Rye_Station

The Council's plan has always been to get the works completed by 2016, so maybe there will be some signs of it before the end of 2014, but maybe 2015. In the meantime, do please read the info on the above weblinks and see if you can contribute to the public conversation about the design and plans.

The Peckham Vision led work to restore the original staircase is proceeding and should be completed by Spring 2014 if we successfully raise another ?50k. see here for info on that: http://www.peckhamvision.org/wiki/Peckham_Rye_Station/station_forecourt

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Last week we had no water for over 24 hours and very little support from Thames Water when we called - had to fight for water to be delivered, even to priority homes. Strongly suggest you contact [email protected] as she was arranging a meeting with TW to discuss the abysmal service
    • The is very low water pressure in the middle of Friern Road this morning.
    • I think mostly those are related to the same "issues". In my experience, it's difficult using the pin when reporting problems, especially if you're on a mobile... There's two obvious leaks in that stretch and has been for sometime one of them apparently being sewer flooding 😱  
    • BBC Homepage Skip to content Accessibility Help EFor you Notifications More menu Search BBC                     BBC News Menu   UK England N. Ireland Scotland Alba Wales Cymru Isle of Man Guernsey Jersey Local News Vets under corporate pressure to increase revenue, BBC told   Image source,Getty Images ByRichard Bilton, BBC Panorama and Ben Milne, BBC News Published 2 hours ago Vets have told BBC Panorama they feel under increasing pressure to make money for the big companies that employ them - and worry about the costly financial impact on pet owners. Prices charged by UK vets rose by 63% between 2016 and 2023, external, and the government's competition regulator has questioned whether the pet-care market - as it stands - is giving customers value for money. One anonymous vet, who works for the UK's largest vet care provider, IVC Evidensia, said that the company has introduced a new monitoring system that could encourage vets to offer pet owners costly tests and treatment options. A spokesperson for IVC told Panorama: "The group's vets and vet nurses never prioritise revenue or transaction value over and above the welfare of the animal in their care." More than half of all UK households are thought to own a pet, external. Over the past few months, hundreds of pet owners have contacted BBC Your Voice with concerns about vet bills. One person said they had paid £5,600 for 18 hours of vet-care for their pet: "I would have paid anything to save him but felt afterwards we had been taken advantage of." Another described how their dog had undergone numerous blood tests and scans: "At the end of the treatment we were none the wiser about her illness and we were presented with a bill of £13,000."   Image caption, UK pet owners spent £6.3bn on vet and other pet-care services in 2024, according to the CMA Mounting concerns over whether pet owners are receiving a fair deal prompted a formal investigation by government watchdog, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). In a provisional report, external at the end of last year, it identified several issues: Whether vet companies are being transparent about the ownership of individual practices and whether pet owners have enough information about pricing The concentration of vet practices and clinics in the hands of six companies - these now control 60% of the UK's pet-care market Whether this concentration has led to less market competition and allowed some vet care companies to make excess profits 'Hitting targets' A vet, who leads one of IVC's surgeries (and who does not want to be identified because they fear they could lose their job), has shared a new internal document with Panorama. The document uses a colour code to compare the company's UK-wide tests and treatment options and states that it is intended to help staff improve clinical care. It lists key performance indicators in categories that include average sales per patient, X-rays, ultrasound and lab tests. The vet is worried about the new policy: "We will have meetings every month, where one of the area teams will ask you how many blood tests, X-rays and ultrasounds you're doing." If a category is marked in green on the chart, the clinic would be judged to be among the company's top 25% of achievers in the UK. A red mark, on the other hand, would mean the clinic was in the bottom 25%. If this happens, the vet says, it might be asked to come up with a plan of action. The vet says this would create pressure to "upsell" services. Panorama: Why are vet bills so high? Are people being priced out of pet ownership by soaring bills? Watch on BBC iPlayer now or BBC One at 20:00 on Monday 12 January (22:40 in Northern Ireland) Watch on iPlayer For instance, the vet says, under the new model, IVC would prefer any animal with suspected osteoarthritis to potentially be X-rayed. With sedation, that could add £700 to a bill. While X-rays are sometimes necessary, the vet says, the signs of osteoarthritis - the thickening of joints, for instance - could be obvious to an experienced vet, who might prefer to prescribe a less expensive anti-inflammatory treatment. "Vets shouldn't have pressure to do an X-ray because it would play into whether they are getting green on the care framework for their clinic." IVC has told Panorama it is extremely proud of the work its clinical teams do and the data it collects is to "identify and close gaps in care for our patients". It says its vets have "clinical independence", and that prioritising revenue over care would be against the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons' (RCVS) code and IVC policy. Vets say they are under pressure to bring in more money per pet   Published 15 April 2025 Vets should be made to publish prices, watchdog says   Published 15 October 2025 The vet says a drive to increase revenue is undermining his profession. Panorama spoke to more than 30 vets in total who are currently working, or have worked, for some of the large veterinary groups. One recalls being told that not enough blood tests were being taken: "We were pushed to do more. I hated opening emails." Another says that when their small practice was sold to a large company, "it was crazy... It was all about hitting targets". Not all the big companies set targets or monitor staff in this way. The high cost of treatment UK pet owners spent £6.3bn on vet and other pet-care services in 2024 - equal to just over £365 per pet-owning household, according to the CMA. However, most pet owners in the UK do not have insurance, and bills can leave less-well-off families feeling helpless when treatment is needed. Many vets used not to display prices and pet owners often had no clear idea of what treatment would cost, but in the past two years that has improved, according to the CMA. Rob Jones has told Panorama that when his family dog, Betty, fell ill during the autumn of 2024 they took her to an emergency treatment centre, Vets Now, and she underwent an operation that cost almost £5,000. Twelve days later, Betty was still unwell, and Rob says he was advised that she could have a serious infection. He was told a diagnosis - and another operation - would cost between £5,000-£8,000.   Image caption, Betty's owners were told an operation on her would cost £12,000 However, on the morning of the operation, Rob was told this price had risen to £12,000. When he complained, he was quoted a new figure - £10,000. "That was the absolute point where I lost faith in them," he says. "It was like, I don't believe that you've got our interests or Betty's interests at heart." The family decided to put Betty to sleep. Rob did not know at the time that both his local vet, and the emergency centre, branded Vets Now, where Betty was treated, were both owned by the same company - IVC. He was happy with the treatment but complained about the sudden price increase and later received an apology from Vets Now. It offered him £3,755.59 as a "goodwill gesture".   Image caption, Rob Jones says he lost faith in the vets treating his pet dog Betty Vets Now told us its staff care passionately for the animals they treat: "In complex cases, prices can vary depending on what the vet discovers during a consultation, during the treatment, and depending on how the patient responds. "We have reviewed our processes and implemented a number of changes to ensure that conversations about pricing are as clear as possible." Value for money? Independent vet practices have been a popular acquisition for corporate investors in recent years, according to Dr David Reader from the University of Glasgow. He has made a detailed study of the industry. Pet care has been seen as attractive, he says, because of the opportunities "to find efficiencies, to consolidate, set up regional hubs, but also to maximise profits". Six large veterinary groups (sometimes referred to as LVGs) now control 60% of the UK pet care market - up from 10% a decade ago, according to the CMA, external. They are: Linnaeus, which owns 180 practices Medivet, which has 363 Vet Partners with 375 practices CVS Group, which has 387 practices Pets at Home, which has 445 practices under the name Vets for Pets IVC Evidensia, which has 900 practices When the CMA announced its provisional findings last autumn, it said there was not enough competition or informed choice in the market. It estimated the combined cost of this to UK pet owners amounted to £900m between 2020-2024. Corporate vets dispute the £900m figure. They say their prices are competitive and made freely available, and reflect their huge investment in the industry, not to mention rising costs, particularly of drugs. The corporate vets also say customers value their services highly and that they comply with the RCVS guidelines.   Image caption, A CMA survey suggests pet owners are happy with the service they receive from vets A CMA survey suggests pet owners are happy with their vets - both corporate and independent - when it comes to quality of service. But, with the exception of Pets at Home, customer satisfaction on cost is much lower for the big companies. "I think that large veterinary corporations, particularly where they're owned by private equity companies, are more concerned about profits than professionals who own veterinary businesses," says Suzy Hudson-Cooke from the British Veterinary Union, which is part of Unite. Proposals for change The CMA's final report on the vet industry is expected by the spring but no date has been set for publication. In its provisional report, it proposed improved transparency on pricing and vet ownership. Companies would have to reveal if vet practices were part of a chain, and whether they had business connections with hospitals, out-of-hours surgeries, online pharmacies and even crematoria. IVC, CVS and Vet Partners all have connected businesses and would have to be more transparent about their services in the future. Pets at Home does not buy practices - it works in partnership with individual vets, as does Medivet. These companies have consistently made clear in their branding who owns their practices. The big companies say they support moves to make the industry more transparent so long as they don't put too high a burden on vets. David Reader says the CMA proposals could have gone further. "There's good reason to think that once this investigation is concluded, some of the larger veterinary groups will continue with their acquisition strategies." The CMA says its proposals would "improve competition by helping pet owners choose the right vet, the right treatment, and the right way to buy medicine - without confusion or unnecessary cost". For Rob Jones, however, it is probably too late. "I honestly wouldn't get another pet," he says. "I think it's so expensive now and the risk financially is so great.             Food Terms of Use About the BBC Privacy Policy Cookies Accessibility Help Parental Guidance Contact the BBC Make an editorial complaint BBC emails for you Copyright © 2026 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...