Jump to content

Recommended Posts

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The c1949 building at 117-125 Rye Lane is not a

> shopping arcade.

>

> I am aware that a number of people would like to

> see Station Arcade destroyed.

>

> I also understand why someone's personal taste

> should prefer an imitation continental style to

> Englishe vernacular.

>

> John K


I'm not disputing the fact that the arcade (shopping, station, or otherwise) has merit and appeal, but its effect in being placed in front of another station and thus meaning only access is through dark, dank and unpleasant alleyways, is a negative one. If it was a building on its own I would argue it should be protected. But it's not. Opening up the front of the station would surely be in the public good. In my opinion anyway...

What jimmy said


I don't think the current facade is especially good, but it could be worth saving in another context


Given the potential choices I'm all for opening up that part of rye lane, permitting a pleasing and different aspect. It would (IMO) give rye lane new lungs and a focal point


The current facade, however worthy, isn't even noticed by... At a guess, at least 95% of people. It fails in its job to please the eye if the eye isn't even aware of it

As a local resident of 68 years i am fed up with living in a sh..t hole.


That whole area is a dump. How many residents can remember dunns the outfitters on that entrance. When rye lane was something to be proud of.


Walk down rye lane and station entrance early morning before it all gets busy and see how rank the pavements are and the fifth that is engrained everywhere.


There is nothing to save. Start from new

As someone who has been using Peckham Rye station for the last four years or so, I completely agree with Spider. Whilst I wasn't fortunate enough to live in the area when Rye Lane was in its heyday, I have read up on what it was like, and find it so sad that it has become the litter-strewn road that it is today.


Fortunately from what I've heard it sounds like the wheels are in motion to restore the station to at least a glimmer of its former glory, and about time too.



spider69 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As a local resident of 68 years i am fed up with

> living in a sh..t hole.

>

> That whole area is a dump. How many residents can

> remember dunns the outfitters on that entrance.

> When rye lane was something to be proud of.

>

> Walk down rye lane and station entrance earlier

> morning before it all gets busy and see how rank

> the pavements are and the fifth that is engrained

> everywhere.

>

> There is nothing to save. Start from new

Well then, the sooner it is razed to the ground and rebuilt, the better!!


woodrot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> the hipster vermin wouldnt stand for a revamp -

> they are poverty tourists and love the seedy run

> down neglected shittyness of the place.

And by the way, does anybody actually *like* the balls of tumbleweave that are basically now a permanent fixture of the roads around the station? I'm becoming a bit fed-up of getting bits of fake hair caught in my sandals to be honest.


Why don't these businesses give a damn about their environment or the effect it has on anyone else? It's really horrible :(

Well it seems that is what Peckham Vision are aiming to do - and it can't come soon enough in my opinion. It's sad how horribly neglected it has all become.


spider69 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How much imagination does it take to picture the

> whole area completely redeveloped with the station

> as the centre

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You do get the feeling - 10 years and nothing will

> change the way things are moving.

>

> More young professionals with no links to the area

> moving in and they really won't care

> about razing the whole place - so if PV want to do

> it properly - I'd advice now.


I don't think you should be so hasty to tar all newcomers with the same brush JohnL. So far as your loose definition goes, I might class as a 'newcomer' - I moved to the area four years ago, and am probably a young (ish) professional. I've made it my home and want to stay here for quite a few years to come. I don't have links to the area, no, but does that make a huge difference? I care about what it is like now; and what it is like in the future - as do most of my neighbours from what I can tell. I don't want to make Peckham something it isn't but I welcome the efforts that are going into making it a more welcoming central hub for all of the community

"I note the "bigger is better" suggested criterion for why the Brixton arcades have been listed and why Station Arcade has not been lisited.


Unless there is a simliar building elsewhere then Station Arcade is the sole survivor of its type.


The railway station received its listing on 31 January 2008.


"Squat" is an interesting verb to use.


I know that there is an argument for the destruction of our architectural heritage when it is inconvenient and in the way, even if it is a unique building."



Peckham's Station Arcade may be the sole survivor of its type, and therefore unique, but that in itself does not make it worthy of being preserved, imo. The Brixton Arcades are bigger but that's not the only thing they had going for them. My previous post was written in haste. When I came to live in Brixton in 92, the Arcades were already pretty run down and spent several more years getting progressively more so. However, even at their most unloved, they had a presence, a sense of potential, that Station Arcade lacks.


Squat was used with reference to something sitting on its knees. But perhaps I'm being unfair and it isn't really a toad of a building. Perhaps if the plans for the Station don't go ahead, the Arcade will live up to your estimation and transform itself into a worthy alternative centre of focus for Rye Lane. Perhaps not. Therein squats the toad.

I've been here 7 years and like some things - others (the hair for

instance) I hate.


My shared ownership flat stayed in negative equity for 6 years odd

just out now - and that's including payments.


Just feel a lot of people in London won't be that patient.


jimmyraj Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > You do get the feeling - 10 years and nothing

> will

> > change the way things are moving.

> >

> > More young professionals with no links to the

> area

> > moving in and they really won't care

> > about razing the whole place - so if PV want to

> do

> > it properly - I'd advice now.

>

> I don't think you should be so hasty to tar all

> newcomers with the same brush JohnL. So far as

> your loose definition goes, I might class as a

> 'newcomer' - I moved to the area four years ago,

> and am probably a young (ish) professional. I've

> made it my home and want to stay here for quite a

> few years to come. I don't have links to the

> area, no, but does that make a huge difference? I

> care about what it is like now; and what it is

> like in the future - as do most of my neighbours

> from what I can tell. I don't want to make

> Peckham something it isn't but I welcome the

> efforts that are going into making it a more

> welcoming central hub for all of the community

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think they key thing is with the Peckham Vision

> lot is that they love where they live, and want to

> bring out the best in it. Not transform it into

> something it isn't.


thanks - not always easy to convey on websites and in these cyber forums, but yes definitely. Hope anyone who shares that vision will join us through the following links:

http://www.peckhamvision.org


http://www.facebook.com/PeckhamVision

email list: [email protected]

Hi Eileen, do you know when the proposed works to Peckham Rye Station - creating the public square etc - are due to begin? I can't seem to find any information on it and am dying to know!


Many thanks.


Eileen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeremy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think they key thing is with the Peckham

> Vision

> > lot is that they love where they live, and want

> to

> > bring out the best in it. Not transform it into

> > something it isn't.

>

> thanks - not always easy to convey on websites and

> in these cyber forums, but yes definitely. Hope

> anyone who shares that vision will join us through

> the following links:

> http://www.peckhamvision.org

>


> http://www.facebook.com/PeckhamVision

> email list: [email protected]

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I may have missed it, but I can't see anything

> about the station garden in the Peckham Vision

> documentation.

> John K


We have the photo of the front garden and it is up on our Peckham Rye Station facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=402539499816950&set=a.394475537290013.91389.319532484784319&type=1&theater


I like the map you have linked to showing that and a back garden - can you get me a digital version I can use? Any more info about the whole garden set up then?

Girl82 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi Eileen, do you know when the proposed works to

> Peckham Rye Station - creating the public square

> etc - are due to begin? I can't seem to find any

> information on it and am dying to know!


Possibly 2015. There is a lot of work going on behind the scenes to plan and design it, as a number of buildings and businesses are affected. We had hoped that there would all this year be a public conversation about the design but we heard recently that the Council and Network Rail are aiming to go straight to planning application by October / November before the end of the year. So we are aiming to stimulate a public conversation about the design in these cyber forums before then. Please see here for the latest on that:

Station development plans - http://www.peckhamvision.org/wiki/Peckham_Rye_Station_Gateway#Public_conversation_about_the_design_of_the_station_developments_August_2013

Peckham Rye Station background - http://www.peckhamvision.org/wiki/Peckham_Rye_Station

The Council's plan has always been to get the works completed by 2016, so maybe there will be some signs of it before the end of 2014, but maybe 2015. In the meantime, do please read the info on the above weblinks and see if you can contribute to the public conversation about the design and plans.

The Peckham Vision led work to restore the original staircase is proceeding and should be completed by Spring 2014 if we successfully raise another ?50k. see here for info on that: http://www.peckhamvision.org/wiki/Peckham_Rye_Station/station_forecourt

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
    • I had some time with him recently at the local neighbourhood forum and actually was pretty impressed by him, I think he's come a long way.
    • I cook at home - almost 95% of what we eat at home is cooked from scratch.  But eating out is more than just having dinner, it is socialising and doing something different. Also,sometimes it is nice to pay someone else to cook and clear up.
    • Yup Juan is amazing (and his partner can't remember her name!). Highly recommend the wine tastings.  Won't be going to the new chain.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...