Jump to content

Recommended Posts

woodrot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I see a rolex, I see someone who has been to

> Thailand for a holiday.

>

Nooo. I've got a platinum Rolex Oyster and I bought it from the Forum shops in VEGAS BABY. That was a nice holiday and it's a nice watch. Unfortunately I don't wear it because it is very small and discrete and I'm blind so I can't tell the time on it's little silver hands and invisible mother of pearl face. I'm looking for a replacement watch which will be HUGE. Seriously, I want a BIG watch, I think they look really cool on girls. So there.


Mr Ben -

> Another good reason is a gold Rolex Oyster shouts

> "mug me" when you're on the 12 at 11.30pm on a

> Friday night


Anyone who knows me knows that I have the most rubbish phone known to man. I had my phone snatched late at night on the No 12 when it was still a bendy bus. The thieves took a ?42 telephone (really) from a hand wearing a ?????? watch. Most thieves really are very dumb.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/35821-big-watches/#findComment-675064
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So irrespective of the scandal how do you think that Rayner did as Housing Secretary?  
    • The Labour astro-turfers are out in force on this thread aren't they!
    • I don't really care about political sleaze in this  i am more concerned about thjle ability to run.a country without running it into the ground. Currently, labout seem to be heading straight towards the rocks, ignoring the warning blasts from the economic ighthouse. 
    • Which is exactly why Rayner had to go - don't be the sleaze attack dog and then not keep your own house in order - the really shocking fact is she didn't go the moment this came to light because she knew what advice, and the advice to seek proper tax expertise that was given to her in writing by the very people she was trying to throw under the bus - she clearly thought she might be able to spin her way out of it. When you look at the facts, the advice she was given and when and her behaviour in the last few days it has been scandalous and just shows the contempt for the public intelligence some politicians have. Interesting to see a very unscientific vox pop on BBC News last night but a lot of her own constituents seem to want rid of her as well and to be honest if you have to lose your cabinet role for this breach of the rules then you should probably lose your seat too. That is the hypocrisy here and why a lot of people don't like politicians because they're all the same.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...