Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Cassius Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Surely if you care about the planet then the

> extinction of the human race can be the best

> possible outcome. It managed quite happily

> without us for about 99.999999% of its existence.

> Bird flu - bring it on.....


But if there is no one there to know that the world exists, it may very well not. You?re playing with the very existence of existence there, stop it. It frightens me.

There is a difference between saying "wait a minute, why don't we ease of on the accelerator even if we are in the speed limit - there seems to be a lot of oil on the ground" and "Stop the car! Stop the car!"


I think there is merit in people not having children - probably a small percentage will opt for that route but clearly at current rate of population growth, the globe will give up the ghost eventually?


I wouldn't rule out an eventual cap on family size either - I see nothing intrinsically unfair about it - for the same reason.

I think people that don't have children should have a collective responsibility to take on the financial burden of those that do!


So, if each CHILDFREE person on here would like to make a contribution to my boys nursery fees from next January please PM me!


Go on , pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeez????

Ratty - I already to contribute to your children's education by paying taxes (unless of course you go private and then don't need my contribution!)


Edited to add - sorry in retrospect realised this seems a bit pious - maybe I should have added a :)

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There is a difference between saying "wait a

> minute, why don't we ease of on the accelerator

> even if we are in the speed limit - there seems to

> be a lot of oil on the ground" and "Stop the car!

> Stop the car!"

>

> I think there is merit in people not having

> children - probably a small percentage will opt

> for that route but clearly at current rate of

> population growth, the globe will give up the

> ghost eventually?

>

> I wouldn't rule out an eventual cap on family size

> either - I see nothing intrinsically unfair about

> it - for the same reason.




is that YOUR excuse? or is it not wanting to share your toys?

capt_birdseye Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ...and Ratty's children will be paying for your

> state pension (unless they've been scrapped by

> then) :)



My children will be scrapped????? Oh, I see! :D


Had a half hour of play with my one year old before work this morning. He is learning to walk and pelted across the front room, gaining speed before nearly falling splat on his face (his elbows just saved him).


Yes - having children, for me, is the BEST THING EVER!

I find children, babies and pregnant women utterly repulsive - it's almost verging on phobic. I'm staring to think it's an evolutionary thing... like the world is so over populated that now some people are born to inherently not want children.


People always think I'm exaggerating or that I will "grow out of it" (I'm close to 30 now), but really, I can't stand children. It's like a parasite that feeds off of you for 9 months, then it comes out of your vagina (the average baby weighs 7.5lbs!) and you're expected to look after it and buy it stuff for 18+ years. NO THANKS!


I'm going to stick to cats. All babies look like Winston Churchill... but you's be hard pressed to find an un-cute kitten!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...