Jump to content

Recommended Posts

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>>

> Why do you even care? Are the Aussies and Kiwi's

> particularly vociferous in their objections to you

> cutting down trees?


PMSL that made laugh out loud at my desk..


Strawbs <-- now drinking red wine out of a mug

david_carnell Wrote:


> Why do you even care? Are the Aussies and Kiwi's

> particularly vociferous in their objections to you

> cutting down trees?


Watch out for jrussel's next troll^H^H^H^Hhread "Too many generic antipodeans in East Dulwich"

And those Pacific Islanders! I tell you....


Can you really say you can tell the difference between a Tongan and a Fijian?! I can't. And I'm mad about it.


They come over here with their polite manners and dignified social behaviour and do their "activities".


If I ever see one, well, I'll probably come on here again and tell you all about it.

I don't understand why you ask whether French twenty-somethings are similar to German or Spanish?


david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Don't know any French twenty-somethings.

>

> Are they similar to the Germans and the Spanish

> though.

>

> Why do you even care? Are the Aussies and Kiwi's

> particularly vociferous in their objections to you

> cutting down trees?

TIPS FOR TROLLS


1. Don't be too obvious.

Everybody knows what the difference is between Kiwis and Australians. Keep the subject matter believable.


2. Don't do anything too technical.

If you're smart/geeky enough to know how to insert a cheeky script that puts people's Facebook picture in a thread, then you know full well what the differences are between Kiwis and Australians.


3. Hijack a thread from within - don't start your own.

This draws less attention to yourself and allows you to build-up a plausible identity.


4. Allow sufficient time to elapse between trolling

Give your last ruse time to die down before embarking on the next one. Not only will people hopefully have forgotten about you, but it will also allow time for newcomers - who've never heard of you - to rise to the bait.


GOOD LUCK, TROLLS!

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The opening post is obviously written by an

> ignoramus. Anyway your answer is about 400 miles

> at a rough guess.


You only mark yourself out as the ignoramus here. I specifically made a statement in my opening post to avoid people coming back with this kind of stupid response. Here it is bolded for your benefit:

-----------

his morning a "Kiwi" got all offended when I referred to him as Australian and when I was then quite indifferent about my "mistake".


I understand that they come from different countries, obviously, and that they speak with slightly different accents, but for London purposes, does it really matter? We all know what kind of Aussies/Kiwis tend to come to London and the way they behave, so making a distinction between the two seems quite academic. It would be a bit like complaining about calling someone a "hoodie" when in fact they weren't technically wearing a hooded top but perhaps had a large collar and a large hat on instead but still with the intention of disguising their identity.


Obviously the context in which you refer to someone as "Australian" or "Kiwi" has some bearing on whether the distinction is relevant but if the context is discussing their impact on London, or the activities they engage in, then I really don't see the problem.

--------


If you don't understand the subtlety of the question, why do you bother trying to derail the discussion with personal attacks?


As yet no-one has been able to answer my question: how are the two nationalities to be distinguished with regard to their activities and behaviour whilst living in London?


Has the question now been stated clearly enough?

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The opening post is obviously written by an

> ignoramus. Anyway your answer is about 400 miles

> at a rough guess.



Oh, and, if your "400 miles" response is to be taken seriously: it is actually more like 2,500 miles. And maybe you would like to bear in mind the fact that Australia is itself about 2500 miles wide. Just some little educational facts for you. Although they are entirely irrelevant to the discussion here.

jrussel Wrote:


> how are the two nationalities to be distinguished with regard to their activities and behaviour whilst living in London?


You can't, they do the same activities and they behave the same.


Anyway, I saw they were digging that hole in the middle of the Goose Green roundabout this morning ready for the tree to go in it.

As a foreigner I'm rather curious what a peron's nationality has to do that person's "activities and behaviour" in London. Also what sort of people "tend to come to London"?


Regards,

Mr. Gets Offended Being Called The Wrong Nationality Too


jrussel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As yet no-one has been able to answer my question:

> how are the two nationalities to be distinguished

> with regard to their activities and behaviour

> whilst living in London?

Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> jrussel Wrote:

>

> > how are the two nationalities to be

> distinguished with regard to their activities and

> behaviour whilst living in London?

>

> You can't, they do the same activities and they

> behave the same.


Thank you. In which case, the fellow who I spoke to this morning, and who I told was behaving just like most people would expect from an Australian, had no reason to get all uppity with me on the basis that he was a "Kiwi".

Floating Onion Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As a foreigner I'm rather curious what a peron's

> nationality has to do that person's "activities

> and behaviour" in London. Also what sort of

> people "tend to come to London"?

>

> Regards,

> Mr. Gets Offended Being Called The Wrong

> Nationality Too

>

> jrussel Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > As yet no-one has been able to answer my

> question:

> > how are the two nationalities to be

> distinguished

> > with regard to their activities and behaviour

> > whilst living in London?


Why exactly do you get offended by being called another nationality? Do you consider your nationality superior to others?

Floating Onion Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh yeah, a quick measurement put it at just over

> 1,000 miles. Jah was closer.

>

>


It obviously depends where you measure from.


My measurement was from the centre of Australia and was correct.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...