Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"I don't think it will be much longer before Adventure Bar move out, every time I walk past it seems half empty. Whereas the ones in other areas are rammed most nights. Oh Lordship Lane what have these nappy valley yummiest and their banker hubby's done to you?"


I nearly missed this. Anybody who thinks that yummy mummies/bankers are the target market for the Adventure Bar has clearly never set foot inside the place.

I think the point is that yummy mummies etc. specifically aren't the Adventure Bar demographic - as they have moved in they have moved-on that demographic - hence their influence on Lordship lane (by not being party animals) has been malign. Bankers and yummies don't have the energy/ presence for late evening LL shennanigans.

I think the market's just widened around ED in the last couple of years - there are genuine alternatives on either side of ED to go out to, whether that's Peckham or Camberwell or Forest Hill which have made the market more competitive. Most of LL seems pretty busy on a Friday night but there's definitely some empty seats around on week nights.


Personally I loved Draft House - friendly service and great beers - and will be sad to see it go but there is a lot of pubs on the strip and probably not enough people out of an evening to sustain them all. All things to all men places like the EDT and Bishop which offer a decent enough range of beer and food will probably fair best. Lord only knows how the Cherry Tree keeps on surviving

DaveR Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think you're being overly generous to the poster

> there, and the comment still doesn't make any

> sense.


I think you just misinterpreted it Dave. I think Louisa's spot on with the observation. East Dulwich is no longer the only show in this part of town. Peckham and Camberwell have got interesting and are now the default choice for the local sub 30-something crowd, whilst ED has become more and more a family area.


When I was 25 I'd happily go out for a few on a Tuesday night. But young family types rarely go out midweek - more likely weekenders when the babysitters in. So I actually think the potential demographic for midweek custom has narrowed not widened. And that subtle shift is now hurting an already saturated Lordship Lane.


The smart startups were picking a spot on Bellenden Road surrounds 3 years ago.

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> One other thought....whilst I get Louisa's point,

> there really aren't too many bankers living in

> East Dulwich. They're all living in much nicer

> areas!


MrBen I agree, probably more Dulwich Village than here. Although, that family orientated demographic has increased in recent years and surely it has in some way affected the footfall in LL on a week night. I take the point about Peckham and Forest Hills emergence from the shadows.


Louisa.

MrBen Wrote:

--------------------------------------------------

> One other thought....whilst I get Louisa's point,

> there really aren't too many bankers living in

> East Dulwich. They're all living in much nicer

> areas!


I think this is true up until recently, but I do find myself wondering what these people buying ?1m+ houses do for a living... that's going to be a bit of a stretch for your average programmer or accountant.

People just riding the wave - they never have the wealth themselves but if 10 years ago they bought a flat for 100k and moved 2/3 times (doing some improvements to each place) it's easy to see where you'd get the 200k equity for a deposit.


Millionaires and even people on 250k+ don't buy 1m houses - they either buy much bigger or quite often rent in fancier areas - with a main house elsewhere.

People who make 250k a year do tend to live in homes that cost circa 1m. Banker's above VP level make more than that though. Also, younger high earning professionals are more happy to spend that 1m on a flat closer to town than an older professional with children who will be looking for an area where that budget can buy them a house.

Kingy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> anyone queueing already ?


Rhetorical questions I'm sure but anyway: Queued for Burger and Lobster off Picadilly last Weds night. Queueing meant standing outside briefly and then at the bar having a drink for 40 mins. Don't mind doing that at all and was worth it.

I believe there have been experiments where fake queues ...


I think this is only in societies/ circumstances where queuing is normal - i.e. where there is rationing or there are regular shortages, or where a queue might be expected, for instance the Boxing Day sales (when sales at Christmas started on Boxing Day).

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't understand the burger and lobster concept.

> If I'm reading it right you pay ?20 and can have

> either a lobster or a burger.

>

> Who in their right mind would pay ?20 for a burger

> and queue for the privilege?


Guess what - you queue for the ?20 lobster, not the ?20 burger. The burger is probably there for anyone who doesn't want lobster but almost everyone seemed to be on lobster.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
    • This has given me ideas for the ginger wine I love, that no one else likes!      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...