Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I run a pub in covent garden and we had the same problem with residents complaining about the noise. When the council visited, they said they couldn't see a problem. So we set a meeting with the residents that live close by and managed to sort out they grievences.


It makes a massive difference when you actually get to know the people you're complaining about!!!!

Oh c'mon Boatthenell. Covent Garden is an established area for socialising in the west end. We are in a residential area. I have no problem contacting the owner but imagine that it will fall on deaf ears given the wonga is his raking in from charging ?5 entry..... Can't wait for tonight. It's "Surgery" night tonight apparently...

I understand what you're saying, but shouldn't you at least try???? If the manager is unwilling to listen, then obviously you take it further. At least then you know that you've done everything possible to come to an amicable solution.


In answer to your question woody, it was late evening. from around 10pm till 1am. I'm not unsympathetic to your prediciment, but i just think you should try to be reasonable before bulldozing in with all guns blazing. If the manager doesn't know that you have a problem with the noise, how is he suppose to appease you???


It's very difficult to control noise pollution once patrons have left your premises.

I agree with your point and know that it is difficult to control noise once outsdie the premises. BUT.....the conditions of the license are no noise outside the premises after 10:30 or so. this noise is occuring at 3-4am and is violent in nature.....

jrussel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Maybe someone who recognises the right of people

> to enjoy themselves despite the grumblings of

> NIMBY local residents.

>

> If you can't deal with a bit of noise now and

> again, why are you living in one of the world's

> biggest and busiest cities? I suggest you should

> go and stagnate in your cardigan and slippers

> somewhere in Zone 6.


Must say that I've not noticed that Forest Hill Road has fallen slap bang in the middle of Hackney or Shoreditch without letting any of its residents know. (sorry I've bitten!)


I've been to the FHT once - that was enough - I scarpered back down to the Herne sharpish! But then I like to enjoy myself without disturbing other people.

Someone I know was contesting a late night opening of a bar elsewher in London and one of the points raised was that the majority of the noise came as people left the bar and were no longer in it's jurisdiction, and the outcome was that the noise levels would be reviewed after 3 months and the late-night license rescinded if there was a high number of complaints about the noise - even though the bar could not be legally responsible for it.
A few weeks ago I was walking back from Si Mangia on a Friday night and we walked past the FHT at only about 10:30pm but already the music was thumping. According to their website, they will now be having "club-nights" every weekend and not just the first weekend of every month. What joy.

making my first post after 'google-ing' to see if there was anything about the FHT, and to see if this is an issue for anybody else. And here it is right at the top of your forum!


my missus complained to the council the other weekend aftet having enough of the noise. they have said if it happens again they will come around again but really i dont see that it is neccesary, the council should look at the license they granted without consulting local residents and see that it makes no sense! i appreciate the pub can't do much about its patrons after kicking out time but the noise from the pub is the first issue I think needs tackling. i will say aswell that if it keeps me awake about 100 yards away surely it is not just us and the guy on here who is unappreciative.

I was in the FHT this evening, and they have flyers up for another three club nights finishing at 3am, coming up real soon.


They've cornered a part of the market that is just not in ED, and that's to go out dancing (to club anthems)(choon) and for that they've got business savy. Business savy because if you fancy an old skool knees up who the in their right minds would want to go down The Fridge and risk getting jumped.


As for the noise, I appreciate it can be loud and a bloody nuisance but don't get involved by shouting out the window "why can't you shut the f*ck up you wankers"..as tempting as it is. Contact the council and until they do something, keep a log of the noise (time started and ended) and.... wear earplugs.


I wear earplugs and I can't hear a thing.

macroban Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is this the promoter that is causing the noise

> problem?

>

> There's time for pre-emptive action.


I am shocked that you are passing your grievances onto the forthcoming SMITTEN party?


I am one of MANY promoters at the FHT, and like I said in my own thread, nobody has complained about either of my events on May 26th or August 2nd.


This is simply because we operate a professional system and are respectful to the fact that there are residents nearby, hence our goodwill in informing the local residents of East Dulwich of our forthcoming events and intentions.


I should point out that such unfounded and unresearched accusations are libelous.

>

> I am shocked that you are passing your grievances

> onto the forthcoming SMITTEN party?

>

> I am one of MANY promoters at the FHT, and like I

> said in my own thread, nobody has complained about

> either of my events on May 26th or August 2nd.

>

> This is simply because we operate a professional

> system and are respectful to the fact that there

> are residents nearby, hence our goodwill in

> informing the local residents of East Dulwich of

> our forthcoming events and intentions.

>

> I should point out that such unfounded and

> unresearched accusations are libelous.



I cannot type what I want to reply to this post whilst still being civil. Just keep the noise down or fook off!

Cassius Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "I should point out that such unfounded and

> unresearched accusations are libelous."

>

> Sounds a bit defensive to me - are you going to

> sue people for wanting to get a good nights sleep?


Libel: defamation by written or printed words, pictures, or in any form other than by spoken words or gestures.


I think this accurately describes any unfounded finger pointing? :'(

I'm guessing the FHT may just have to make a bit of extra effort to keep people quiet when they leave the building early in the morning. Joe's obviously aware of this so give him a chance.


ps "Is this the promoter that is causing the noise problem?" is not libellous.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...