Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I run a pub in covent garden and we had the same problem with residents complaining about the noise. When the council visited, they said they couldn't see a problem. So we set a meeting with the residents that live close by and managed to sort out they grievences.


It makes a massive difference when you actually get to know the people you're complaining about!!!!

Oh c'mon Boatthenell. Covent Garden is an established area for socialising in the west end. We are in a residential area. I have no problem contacting the owner but imagine that it will fall on deaf ears given the wonga is his raking in from charging ?5 entry..... Can't wait for tonight. It's "Surgery" night tonight apparently...

I understand what you're saying, but shouldn't you at least try???? If the manager is unwilling to listen, then obviously you take it further. At least then you know that you've done everything possible to come to an amicable solution.


In answer to your question woody, it was late evening. from around 10pm till 1am. I'm not unsympathetic to your prediciment, but i just think you should try to be reasonable before bulldozing in with all guns blazing. If the manager doesn't know that you have a problem with the noise, how is he suppose to appease you???


It's very difficult to control noise pollution once patrons have left your premises.

I agree with your point and know that it is difficult to control noise once outsdie the premises. BUT.....the conditions of the license are no noise outside the premises after 10:30 or so. this noise is occuring at 3-4am and is violent in nature.....

jrussel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Maybe someone who recognises the right of people

> to enjoy themselves despite the grumblings of

> NIMBY local residents.

>

> If you can't deal with a bit of noise now and

> again, why are you living in one of the world's

> biggest and busiest cities? I suggest you should

> go and stagnate in your cardigan and slippers

> somewhere in Zone 6.


Must say that I've not noticed that Forest Hill Road has fallen slap bang in the middle of Hackney or Shoreditch without letting any of its residents know. (sorry I've bitten!)


I've been to the FHT once - that was enough - I scarpered back down to the Herne sharpish! But then I like to enjoy myself without disturbing other people.

Someone I know was contesting a late night opening of a bar elsewher in London and one of the points raised was that the majority of the noise came as people left the bar and were no longer in it's jurisdiction, and the outcome was that the noise levels would be reviewed after 3 months and the late-night license rescinded if there was a high number of complaints about the noise - even though the bar could not be legally responsible for it.
A few weeks ago I was walking back from Si Mangia on a Friday night and we walked past the FHT at only about 10:30pm but already the music was thumping. According to their website, they will now be having "club-nights" every weekend and not just the first weekend of every month. What joy.

making my first post after 'google-ing' to see if there was anything about the FHT, and to see if this is an issue for anybody else. And here it is right at the top of your forum!


my missus complained to the council the other weekend aftet having enough of the noise. they have said if it happens again they will come around again but really i dont see that it is neccesary, the council should look at the license they granted without consulting local residents and see that it makes no sense! i appreciate the pub can't do much about its patrons after kicking out time but the noise from the pub is the first issue I think needs tackling. i will say aswell that if it keeps me awake about 100 yards away surely it is not just us and the guy on here who is unappreciative.

I was in the FHT this evening, and they have flyers up for another three club nights finishing at 3am, coming up real soon.


They've cornered a part of the market that is just not in ED, and that's to go out dancing (to club anthems)(choon) and for that they've got business savy. Business savy because if you fancy an old skool knees up who the in their right minds would want to go down The Fridge and risk getting jumped.


As for the noise, I appreciate it can be loud and a bloody nuisance but don't get involved by shouting out the window "why can't you shut the f*ck up you wankers"..as tempting as it is. Contact the council and until they do something, keep a log of the noise (time started and ended) and.... wear earplugs.


I wear earplugs and I can't hear a thing.

macroban Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is this the promoter that is causing the noise

> problem?

>

> There's time for pre-emptive action.


I am shocked that you are passing your grievances onto the forthcoming SMITTEN party?


I am one of MANY promoters at the FHT, and like I said in my own thread, nobody has complained about either of my events on May 26th or August 2nd.


This is simply because we operate a professional system and are respectful to the fact that there are residents nearby, hence our goodwill in informing the local residents of East Dulwich of our forthcoming events and intentions.


I should point out that such unfounded and unresearched accusations are libelous.

>

> I am shocked that you are passing your grievances

> onto the forthcoming SMITTEN party?

>

> I am one of MANY promoters at the FHT, and like I

> said in my own thread, nobody has complained about

> either of my events on May 26th or August 2nd.

>

> This is simply because we operate a professional

> system and are respectful to the fact that there

> are residents nearby, hence our goodwill in

> informing the local residents of East Dulwich of

> our forthcoming events and intentions.

>

> I should point out that such unfounded and

> unresearched accusations are libelous.



I cannot type what I want to reply to this post whilst still being civil. Just keep the noise down or fook off!

Cassius Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "I should point out that such unfounded and

> unresearched accusations are libelous."

>

> Sounds a bit defensive to me - are you going to

> sue people for wanting to get a good nights sleep?


Libel: defamation by written or printed words, pictures, or in any form other than by spoken words or gestures.


I think this accurately describes any unfounded finger pointing? :'(

I'm guessing the FHT may just have to make a bit of extra effort to keep people quiet when they leave the building early in the morning. Joe's obviously aware of this so give him a chance.


ps "Is this the promoter that is causing the noise problem?" is not libellous.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...