Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Volume and its controls. Especially on my computer. So, there I am, listening to i-toons and it has it's own volume settings. Then I have my computer's own volume control. Then I have external speakers which have another one again. And all of them need adjusting constantly. Why is this necessary? I want a big fat twizzle knob (no laughing) on the front of my box (stoppit) that adjusts the ONE volume for everything.


And don't get me started about why some things are just louder than others. From one song to the next. Nothing has changed and yet my ears are now bleeding.....

Sorry David but, despite instructions, I'm laughing at you.


What about watching telly and then the ads come on and the volume suddenly sky rockets. That shouldn't be legal. Seriously. I think it's illegal to put subliminal messages into bradcast programmes (The Young Ones did it in the 80s and got into trouble) and that's no worse than pumping up the volume for ads.

Well despite you laughing at me it appears we agree. Good.


Varying volumes.....most annoying. Opinion formers, decsion makers - take note. We want volume to stay the same unless we alter them. And we want one volume alteration control. Not more than one. Just one.


Oh, grrr, now you've made me think of more.....my TV is connected to a DVD player and a set-top box and they all have their own controls. And the whole kit and caboodle is connected to an AV amp which has another one. I need a lie down.

the credit crunch / recession - now that we only have one income coming in that is starting to p*ss me off..


People with luggage when commuting, I know I has to be done but its the inconsiderate ones that always seem to be in your way, let their bag drag 2 miles behind them and then have a go at you when you accidently know their bag when trying to get around them..

people that accidentally txt you, you then point out that its not you you guess theyre meant to b contacting but they insist it is and then continue to send several messages that just dont make sense! oh y cant they invent a temporary "block" facility on these wonderful creations of communication (much like the msns of 2day)
  • 2 weeks later...

Argh!!!


I've been travelling in a bit later than usual (due to laziness) and every morning this week have been one of a million heads bobbing about the platforms at London Bridge, trying to get through the inadequate number of gates. So the platform guys open the gates and we all flood through.


This annoys me pettily for two reasons:-


1) There are still people who are so monumentally stupid and inconsiderate as to stop in front of the barriers looking for the ticket THEY DO NOT NEED to get out, and sometimes trying three or four times to push it into the gate - ARGH ARGH!!


and even less rationally


2) What's the point of barriers when at rush hour, the time the majority of travellers are coming through, the gates are just left open to cope with the volume?


Grrrrrrrrrrrrr.


Grumpy Old Moos

Packaging, in all its forms. Especially the ones with the built in "easy-open" section which lulls you into the false premise that it is actually easy-to-open when you know full well you will be grabbing for the kitchen scissors at some point down the line to do what you blooming well should have done at the outset an snipped the thing open with a blade. Grrr

People dawdling around at busy train stations messing about with their Ipod or any other digital attachment and in doing so getting in my way.


Call centers in foreign countries.


Indecisive people.


Soap operas.


I hate shaving but it has to be done.


Washing up.


There will be more in the not too distant future

Not sure this is that petty actually, but anyway.


Here at work, I was not alone in reading a memo and taking it to mean that in our November pay we'd be getting pay increase backdated from April. Everyone was pleased about this before crimbo, and budgeted accordingly to do their xmas shopping.


Pay comes in and sure enough there is no nice extra, just a few quid. Payroll say that you have received your pay rise in November and you'll get backdated in December and that they never said otherwise, even though EVERYONE read it as I did!!!


Call me cynical, but I can't help thinking that they may have just decided to keep all that extra cash in their account for an extra month!


:(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...